Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fuzzy robust process capability indices for risk assessment of air pollution

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Air pollution is one of the most important threats for the humanity. It can damage not only human health but also Earth’s ecosystem. Because of the harmful effects of air pollution, it should be controlled very carefully. To do the risk assessment of air pollution in Istanbul, the process capability indices (PCIs) which are very effective statistics to summarize the performance of process are used in this paper. Fuzzy PCIs are used to determine the levels of the air pollutants which are measured in different nine stations in Istanbul. Robust PCIs (RPCIs) are used when air pollutants have correlation. Fuzzy set theory has been applied for both PCIs and RPCIs to have more sensitive results. More flexible PCIs obtained by using fuzzy specification limits and fuzzy standard deviation are used to evaluate the air pollution’s level of Istanbul. Additionally some evaluation criteria have been constructed for fuzzy PCIs to interpret the air pollution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Buckley JJ (2004) Fuzzy statistics. Studies in fuzziness and soft computing, Springer, Heidelberg

  • Chan LK, Cheng SW, Spiring FA (1988) A new measure of process capability: Cpm. J Qual Technol 20(3):162–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen KS, Huang ML (2007) Process capability evaluation for the process of product families. Qual Quant 41(1):151–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbir T, Müezzinoğlu A (2004) Estimation of emission strengths of primary air pollutants in the city of Izmir, Turkey. Atmos Environ 38:1851–1857

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elbir T, Müezzinoğlu A, Bayram A (2000) Evaluation of some air pollution indicators in Turkey. Environ Int 26:5–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2008a) What are the six common air pollutants? http://www.epa.gov/air/urbanair/6poll.html

  • EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2008b) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). http://www.epa.gov/air/criteria.html

  • Güneş M (2005) A simple evaluation of SO2 and PM data on ambient air quality. Energy Sources 27:729–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu BM, Shu MH, Pearn WL (2007) Measuring process capability based on Cpmk with gauge measurement errors. Qual Reliability Eng Int 23(5):597–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IMM-Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality (2008a) The City. http://www.ibb.gov.tr/en-US/Organization/AuthorityArea/Pages/Districts.aspx)

  • IMM-Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality Department of Environment Protect (2008b) Air quality. http://www.ibb.gov.tr/tr-TR/CevreKoruma/HavaKalitesi/

  • Kane VE (1986) Process capability indices. J Qual Technol 18:41–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Karaca F, Alagha O, Ertürk F (2005) Statistical characterization of atmospheric PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations at a non-impacted suburban site of Istanbul, Turkey. Chemosphere 59:1183–1190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karaca F, Nikov A, Alagha O (2006) NN-AirPol: a neural-network-based method for air pollution evaluation and control. Int J Environ Pollut 28(3–4):310–325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karademir A (2006) Evaluation of the potential air pollution from fuel combustion in industrial boilers in Kocaeli, Turkey. Fuel 85:1894–1903

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karaöz MO (2003) Air pollution effects on forest trees in Balıkesir, Turkey. Water Air Soil Pollut Focus 3:269–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurt A, Gulbagci B, Karaca F, Alagha O (2008) An online air pollution forecasting system using neural networks. Environ Int. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2007.12.020

  • Lee KW (2005) First course on fuzzy theory and applications. Advances in soft computing, Springer, Heidelberg

  • Mathew T, Sebastian G, Kurian KM (2007) Generalized confidence intervals for process capability indices. Qual Reliability Eng Int 23(4):471–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DC (2005) Introduction to statistical quality control. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • NAQWN (National Air Quality Watching Network) (2008) Republic of Turkey Ministry of Environment and Forestry. http://www.havaizleme.gov.tr/

  • Oğuz E, Kaya MD, Nuhoğlu Y (2003) Interaction between air pollution and meteorological parameters in Erzurum, Turkey. Int J Environ Pollut 19(3):292–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özdilek HG (2006) An analogy on assessment of urban air pollution in Turkey over the turn of the millennium (1992–2001). Environmental Monit Assess 122:203–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearn WL, Kotz S, Johnson NL (1992) Distributional and inferential properties of process capability indices. J Qual Technol 24(4):216–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad S, Bramorski T (1998) Robust process capability indices. Omega 26(3):425–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richard AB (2004) Regression analysis: a constructive critique. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • Şen Z, Altunkaynak A, Özger M (2006) Space-time interpolation by combining air pollution and meteorologic variables. Pure Appl Geophys 163:1435–1451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran L, Duckstein L (2002) Comparison of fuzzy numbers using a fuzzy distance measure. Fuzzy Sets Syst 130:331–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TurkStat-Turkish Statistical Institute (2008). http://www.tuik.gov.tr

  • Vannman K, Albing M (2007) Process capability induces for one-sided specification intervals and skewed distributions. Qual Reliability Eng Int 23(6):755–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang DS, Koo TY, Chou CY (2007) On the bootstrap confidence intervals of the capability index Cpk for multiple process streams. Eng Comput 24(5):473–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (World Health Organization) (2005) WHO air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide-Global update 2005. Summary of risk assessment, WHO/SDE/PHE/OEH/06.02

  • WHO (World Health Organization) (2006) Air quality guidelines global update 2005. WHO Regional Office for Europe Publications, German, ISBN 92 890 2192 6

  • World Bank, Environment Department (2008) Initial Draft of Industrial Pollution Prevention and Abatement Handbook, http://www.worldbank.org/html/fpd/em/power/standards/airqstd.stm#eu

  • Wu CW (2007) An alternative approach to test process capability for unilateral specification with subsamples. Int J Prod Res 45(22):5397–5415

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu CW (2008) Assessing process capability based on Bayesian approach with subsamples. Eur J Oper Res 184(1):207–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yıldırım Y, Demircioğlu N, Kobya M, Bayramoğlu M (2002) A mathematical modeling of sulphur dioxide pollution in Erzurum City. Environ Pollut 118:411–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu KT, Sheu SH, Chen KS (2007) The evaluation of process capability for a machining center. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33(5–6):505–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ihsan Kaya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaya, I., Kahraman, C. Fuzzy robust process capability indices for risk assessment of air pollution. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 23, 529–541 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-008-0238-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-008-0238-2

Keywords

Navigation