Abstract
Bayesian modelling of health risks in relation to environmental exposures offers advantages over conventional (non-Bayesian) modelling approaches. We report an example using research into whether, after controlling for different confounders, air pollution (NOx) has a significant effect on coronary heart disease mortality, estimating the relative risk associated with different levels of exposure. We use small area data from Sheffield, England and describe how the data were assembled. We compare the results obtained using a generalized (Poisson) log-linear model with adjustment for overdispersion, with the results obtained using a hierarchical (Poisson) log-linear model with spatial random effects. Both classes of models were fitted using a Bayesian approach. Including spatial random effects models both overdispersion and spatial autocorrelation effects arising as a result of analysing data from small contiguous areas. The first modelling framework has been widely used, while the second provides a more rigorous model for hypothesis testing and risk estimation when data refer to small areas. When the models are fitted controlling only for the age and sex of the populations, the generalized log-linear model shows NOx effects are significant at all levels, whereas the hierarchical log-linear model with spatial random effects shows significant effects only at higher levels. We then adjust for deprivation and smoking prevalence. Uncertainty in the estimates of smoking prevalence, arising because the data are based on samples, was accounted for through errors-in-variables modelling. NOx effects apparently are significant at the two highest levels according to both modelling frameworks.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Estimating with Confidence—Mid-1991 population estimates for small areas. Population Trends 1995; 82:6.
Smoking prevalence in a full probability model has one likelihood contribution from the observed smoking data and another likelihood contribution from the observed heart disease data. The cut function in WinBUGS enables the integrated model to disregard the likelihood contribution from the heart disease outcomes when constructing the full conditional distribution for the smoking prevalence. As a result, the integrated model allows for uncertainty in the smoking prevalence estimates without allowing the heart disease outcomes to influence the smoking prevalence estimates.
References
Besag J (1974) Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems. J R Stat Soc B 36:192–236
Best NG, Cockings S, Bennett JE, Wakefield JC, Elliott P (2001) Ecological regression analysis of environmental benzene exposure and childhood leukaemia: sensitivity to data inaccuracies, geographical scale and ecological bias. J R Stat Soc, Ser A 164:155–174
Blomberg A, Krishna MT, Bocchino V, Biscione GL, Shute JK, Kelly FJ, Frew AJ, Holgate ST, Sandstrom T (1997) The inflammatory effects of 2 ppm NO2 on the airways of healthy subjects. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 156:418–424
Brindley P, Maheswaran R, Pearson T, Wise SM, Haining RP (2004) Using modelled outdoor air pollution data for health surveillance. In: Maheswaran R, Craglia M (eds) GIS in public health practice. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 125–149
Brindley P, Wise S, Maheswaran R, Haining R (2005) The effect of alternative representations of population location on the areal interpolation of air pollution exposure. Comput Environ Urban Syst 29:455–459
Elliott P, Wakefield JC, Best NG, Briggs DJ (2000) Spatial epidemiology: methods and applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Gelman A, Price PN (1999) All maps of parameter estimates are misleading. Stat med 18:3221–3234
Haining R (2003) Spatial data analysis: theory and practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Jackson C, Best N, Richardson S (2005) Improving ecological inference using individual-level data. Stat Med (in press)
Kunzli N, Kaiser R, Medina S, Studnicka M, Chanel O, Filliger P, Herry M, Horak F, Puybonnieux-Texier V, Quenel P, Schneider J, Seethaler R, Vergnaud J-C, Sommer H (2000) Public health impact of outdoor and traffic related air pollution: a European assessment. Lancet 356:795–801
Law J, Haining RP (2004) A Bayesian approach to modelling binary data: the case of high-intensity crime areas. Geogr Anal 36:197–216
Law J, Haining RP, Maheswaran R, Pearson T (2006) Analysing the relationship between smoking and coronary heart disease at the small area level: a Bayesian approach to spatial modelling. Geogr Anal 38(2):140–159
Lawson A, Biggeri A, Bohning D (1999) Disease mapping and risk assessment for public health. Wiley, Chichester
Lebret E, Briggs D, van Reeuwijk H, Fischer P, Smallbone K, Harssema H, Kriz B, Gorynski P, Elliott P (2000) Small area variations in ambient NO2 concentrations in four European cities. Atmos Environ 34:177–183
Maheswaran R, Haining RP, Brindley P, Law J, Pearson T, Fryers PR, Wise S, Campbell MJ (2005a) Outdoor air pollution and stroke in Sheffield, United Kingdom: a small-area level geographical study. Stroke 36:239–243
Maheswaran R, Haining RP, Brindley P, Law J, Pearson T, Fryers PR, Wise S, Campbell MJ (2005b) Outdoor air pollution, mortality and hospital admissions from coronary heart disease in Sheffield, United Kingdom–a small-area level ecological study. Eur Heart J 26:2543–2549
Maheswaran R, Haining RP, Pearson T, Law J, Brindley P, Best NG (2006) Outdoor NOx and stroke mortality–adjusting for small area level smoking prevalence using a Bayesian approach. Stat Methods Med Res 15:499–516
Manton KG, Stallard E (1981) Methods for the analysis of mortality risks across heterogeneous small populations: estimation of space-time gradients in cancer morality in North Carolina counties 1970–1975. Demography 18:217–230
McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1983) Generalized linear models. Chapman and Hall, London
Mollie A (1996) Bayesian mapping of disease. In: Gilks W, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter D (eds) Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 359–379
Morganstern H (1998) Ecologic studies. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S (eds) Modern epidemiology. Lippincott-Raven, PA, pp 459–480
Nafstad P, Haheim LL, Wisloff T, Gram F, Oftedal B, Holme I, Hjermann I, Leren P (2004) Urban air pollution and mortality in a cohort of Norwegian men. Environ Health Perspect 112:610–615
Pope C (2000) Epidemiology of fine particulate air pollution and human health: biologic mechanisms abd who’s at risk? Environ Health Perspect 108(Suppl 4):713–723
Spiegelhalter D, Best N, Carlin B, Van der Linde A (2002) Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit (with discussion). J R Stat Soc B 64:583–640
Spiegelhalter D, Thomas A, Best N, Gilks WR (1996) Bugs 0.5: Bayesian inference using Gibbs sampling manual (Version 2). Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge
Takano H, Yanagisawa R, Inoue K, Shimada A, Ichinose T, Sadakane K, Yoshino S, Yamaki K, Morita M, Yoshikawa T (2004) Nitrogen dioxide air pollution near ambient levels is an atherogenic risk primarily in obese subjects: a brief communication. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 229:361–364
Townsend P, Phillimore P, Beattie A (1988) Health and deprivation: inequality and the north. Croom Helm, London
Wakefield J (2003) Sensitivity analyses for ecological regression. Biometrics 59:9–17
Wakefield J (2004) Ecological inference for 2 × 2 tables. J R Stat Soc, Ser A 167:385–446
Acknowledgements
The research for this paper was supported by grants from the NHS Executive Trent Research Scheme and from the University of Cambridge. The authors wish to thank three anonymous referees and the editors for their helpful comments and advice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haining, R., Law, J., Maheswaran, R. et al. Bayesian modelling of environmental risk: example using a small area ecological study of coronary heart disease mortality in relation to modelled outdoor nitrogen oxide levels. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 21, 501–509 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-007-0134-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-007-0134-1