Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The influence of site characteristics on the leaf-to-sapwood area relationship in chestnut trees (Castanea sativa Mill.)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Trees Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Key message

Biomass allocation in Castanea sativa varies according to the environmental conditions. Specifically, leaf-to-sapwood area ratio is higher on sites with good water supplies and lower in water-stressed conditions.

Abstract

Ecological plasticity allows organisms to adapt and to cope with environmental conditions. This is a key trait for species with long live span, which will probably be more vulnerable to changing climate because of their lower adaptation potential via natural selection. We studied the case of the sweet chestnut tree, a naturalized forest species in many European mountain areas, where it grows on very different climates and sites. This raises the question of its adaptation capacity to very different environmental conditions. To test this hypothesis, we applied the pipe model approach for analysing the variation in the leaf-to-sapwood area ratio (A L:A S) in 82 chestnut trees growing in very different site conditions (e.g., water-stressed convex vs. water-rich concave sites). We used linear regression analyses to model the A L:A S relationship to environmental and dendrometric parameters. Results confirm that A L:A S is significantly higher when trees grow on good nutrient- and water-supplied concave sites with respect to water-stressed, convex sites. Chestnut trees are thus able to vary their biomass allocation between sapwood and leaves to adapt their hydraulic characteristics to the site conditions. Trees seem to react to water-stressed conditions by allocating more biomass in the sapwood in respect to the leaves. A L:A S may thus represent a useful indicator of tree species plasticity and their adaptation potential to different environmental and climate conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beccaro GL, Torello-Marinoni D, Binelli G, Donno D, Boccacci P, Botta R, Cerutti AK, Conedera M (2012) Insights in the chestnut genetic diversity in Canton Ticino (Southern Switzerland). Silvae Genet 6:292–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Beers TW, Dress PE, Wensel LC (1966) Aspect transformation in site productivity research. J Forest 64:691–692

    Google Scholar 

  • Belsley DA, Kuh E, Welsch RE (1980) Regression diagnostics: identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blaser P (1973) Die Bodenbildung auf Silikatgesteinim südlichen Tessin. Mitt Eidgenöss Forsch anst Wald Schnee Landsch 49:251–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaser P, Zimmermann S, Luster J, Walthert L, Lüscher P (2005) Waldböden der Schweiz, vol 2. Birmensdorf, Eidgenössische Forschungsanstalt WSL, Bern, Hep Verlag, Regionen Alpen und Alpensüdseite 920 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonan G (2002) Ecological climatology. Concepts and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaway RM, Sala A, Keane RE (2000) Succession may maintain high leaf area: Sapwood ratios and productivity in old subalpine forests. Ecosystem 3:254–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers JM, Hastie TJ (1992) Statistical Models in S. Chapman & Hall, London

  • Conedera M, Krebs P (2008) History, present situation and perspective of chestnut cultivation in Europe. Acta Hortic 784:23–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conedera M, Manetti MC, Giudici F, Amorini E (2004) Distribution and economic potential of the sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) in Europe. Ecol Medit 30:179–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Conedera M, Fonti P, Nicoloso A, Meloni F, Pividori M (2009) Ribaltamento delle ceppaie di castagno: individuazione delle zone a rischio e proposte selvicolturali. Sherwood 154:15–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Conedera M, Barthold F, Torriani D, Pezzatti GB (2010) Drought sensitivity of Castanea sativa: case study of summer 2003 in the southern alps. Acta Hortic (ishs) 866:297–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruiziat P, Cochard H, Ameglio T (2002) Hydraulic architecture of trees: main concepts and results. Ann Forest Sci 59:723–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai A (2012) Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models. Nat Clim Change 3:52–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delucia EH, Maherali H, Carey EV (2000) Climate-driven changes in biomass allocation in pines. Global Change Biol 6:587–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Lopez J, Zas R, Diaz R, Villani F, Cherubini M, Aravanopoulos FA, Alizoti PG, Eriksson G, Botta R, Mellano MG (2005) Geographic variability among extreme European wild chestnut populations. Acta Hortic 693:181–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gehring E, Pezzatti GB, Krebs P, Mazzoleni S, Conedera M (2015) On the applicability of the pipe model theory on the chestnut tree (Castanea sativa Mill.). Trees Struct Funct 29:321–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grier CG, Running SW (1977) Leaf area of mature northwestern coniferous forests: relation to site water balance. Ecology 58:893–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoadley RB (1980) Understanding wood: a craftsman’s guide to wood technology. Taunton Press Inc, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann AA, Sgrò CM (2011) Climate change and evolutionary adaptation. Nature 470:479–485

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jose S, Gillespie AR (1996) Above ground production efficiency and canopy nutrient contents of mixed-hardwood forest communities along a moisture gradient in the central United States. Can J Forest Res 26:2214–2223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer PJ (1983) Water relations of plants. Academic Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs P, Koutsias N, Conedera M (2012) Modelling the eco-cultural niche of giant chestnut trees: new insights into land use history in southern Switzerland through distribution analysis of a living heritage. J Hist Geogr 38:372–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauteri M, Scartazza A, Guido MC, Brugnoli E (1997) Genetic variation in photosynthetic capacity, carbon isotope discrimination and mesophyll conductance in provenances of Castanea sativa adapted to different environments. Funct Ecol 11:675–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauteri M, Pluira A, Monteverdi MC, Brugnoli E, Villani F, Eriksson G (2004) Genetic variation in carbon isotope discrimination in six European populations of Castanea sativa Mill. originating from contrasting localities. J Evol Biol 17:1286–1296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maherali H, Pockman WT, Jackson RB (2004) Adaptive variation in the vulnerability of woody plants to xylem cavitation. Ecology 8:2184–2199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin MA, Mattioni C, Cherubini M, Taurchini D, Villani F (2010) Genetic diversity in European chestnut populations by means of genomic and genic microsatellite markers. Tree Genet Genomes 6:735–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Vilalta J, Cochard H, Mencuccini M, Sterck F, Herrero A, Korhonen JFJ, Llorens P, Nikinmaa E, Nole A, Poyatos R, Ripullone F, Sass-Klaassen U, Zweifel R (2009) Hydraulic adjustment of Scots pine across Europe. New Phytol 184:353–364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mattioni C, Cherubini M, Micheli E, Villani F, Bucci G (2008) Role of domestication in shaping Castanea sativa genetic variation in Europe. Tree Genet Genomes 4:563–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattioni C, Martin MA, Pollegioni P, Cherubini M, Villani F (2013) Microsatellite markers reveal a strong geographical structure in European populations of Castanea sativa (Fagaceae), Evidence for multiple glacial refugia. Am J Bot 100:951–961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoleni S (1990) Relazioni tra aree fogliarie e superfici di conduzione nel fusto nell’analisi di gradienti ambientali. Linea Ecol, pp 27–30

  • Mazzoleni S, Dickmann DI (1988) Differential physiological and morphological responses of two hybrid Populus clones to water stress. Tree Physiol 4:61–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mencuccini M, Bonosi L (2001) Leaf/sapwood area ratios in Scots pine show acclimation across Europe. Can J Forest Res 31:442–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mencuccini M, Grace J (1994) Climate influences the leaf area/sapwood area ratio in Scots pine. Tree Physiol 15:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmesan C (2006) Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:637–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pividori M, Meloni F, Nicoloso A, Arienti R, Conedera M (2008) Ribaltamento delle ceppaie di castagno due casi di studio in cedui invecchiati Sherwood 14:17–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Poyatos R, Martinez-Vilalta J, Cermak J, Ceulemans R, Granier A, Irvine J, Kostner B, Lagergren F, Meiresonne L, Nadezhdina N, Zimmermann R, Llorens P, Mencuccini M (2007) Plasticity in hydraulic architecture of Scots pine across Eurasia. Oecologia 153:245–259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schlichting CD (1986) The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:667–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulte PJ, Hinckley TM, Stettler RF (1986) Stomatal response of Populus to leaf water potential. Can J Bot 65:255–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz M, Lehmann P, Or D (2010) Quantifying lateral root reinforcement in steep slopes—from a bundle of roots to tree stands. Earth Surf Process Landf 35:354–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz M, Cohen D, Or D (2012) Spatial characterization of root reinforcement at stand scale: theory and case study. Geomorphology 171–172:190–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shinozaki K, Yoda K, Hozumi K, Kira T (1964a) A quantitative analysis of plant form—the pipe model theory. I. Basic analyses. Jpn J Ecol 14:97–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinozaki K, Yoda K, Hozumi K, Kira T (1964b) A quantitative analysis of plant form—the pipe model theory. II. Further evidence of the theory and its application in forest ecology. Jpn J Ecol 14:133–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinedi F, Isotta F (2004) Il clima del Ticino. Dati statistiche e società 2:5–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterck JS, Zweifel R, Sass-Klaassen U, Chowdhury Q (2008) Persisting soil drought reduces leaf specific conductivity in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and pubescent oak (Quercus pubescens). Tree Physiol 28:529–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP—United nations environment programme (1992) In: Middleton N, Thomas DSG (eds) World atlas of desertification. Edward Arnold, London. ISBN 0 340 55512 2

  • Vertessy RA, Benyo RG, O’Sullivan SK, Gribben PR (1995) Relationships between stem diameter, sapwood area, leaf area and transpiration in a young mountain ash forest. Tree Physiol 15:559–567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Villani F, Pigliucci M, Lauteri M, Cherubini M, Sun O (1992) Congruence between genetic, morphometric and physiological data on differentiation of Turkish chestnut (Castanea sativa). Genome 35:251–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt J, Fonti P, Conedera M, Schröder B (2006) Temporal and spatial dynamic of stool uprooting in abandoned chestnut coppice forests. For Ecol Manage 235(1–3):88–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waring RH, Schroeder PE, Oren R (1982) Application of the pipe model theory to predict canopy leaf-area. Can J Forest Res 12:556–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead D, Edwards WRN, Jarvis PG (1984) Conducting sapwood area, foliage area and permeability in mature trees of Picea sitchensis and Pinus contorta. Can J Forest Res 14:940–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Our heartfelt thanks go to Franco Fibbioli, Nora Buletti, and Susan Lagger for their help during data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Insubric Ecosystem Research Group, WSL Swiss Federal Research Institute, a Ramél 18, 6593, Cadenazzo, Switzerland

    Eric Gehring, Gianni Boris Pezzatti, Patrik Krebs & Marco Conedera

  2. Laboratory of Soil Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Emile-Argand 11, 2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland

    Eric Gehring

  3. Dipartimento di Agraria, University of Naples Federico II, Via Università 100, 80055, Portici, Naples, Italy

    Eric Gehring & Stefano Mazzoleni

  4. Hydrological Forecasts Research Group, WSL Swiss Federal Research Institute, Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland

    Massimiliano Zappa

Authors
  1. Eric Gehring
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gianni Boris Pezzatti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Patrik Krebs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Stefano Mazzoleni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Massimiliano Zappa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Marco Conedera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Gehring.

Ethics declarations

Funding

For this study, we only used our internal resources.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by U. Luettge.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 261 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gehring, E., Pezzatti, G.B., Krebs, P. et al. The influence of site characteristics on the leaf-to-sapwood area relationship in chestnut trees (Castanea sativa Mill.). Trees 30, 2217–2226 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-016-1447-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-016-1447-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation