Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Factors influencing choice of renal replacement therapy in European Paediatric Nephrology Units

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 09 August 2013

Abstract

Background

Many factors may impact upon choice of renal replacement therapy (RRT) for children and adolescents, including patient and family choice, patient size and distance from the renal centre as well as logistic issues such as facilities and staffing at the unit. We report a survey of factors influencing treatment choice in 14 European paediatric nephrology units.

Methods

A questionnaire was developed by consensus and completed by 14 members of the European Paediatric Dialysis Working Group on facilities, staffing and family assessments impacting on choice of therapy as well as choice of therapy for 97 patients commencing initial RRT in 2011.

Results

All units offered all modalities of RRT, but there were limitations for pre-emptive transplantation (PET) and largely adult surgical dependence for creation of arteriovenous fistulae and transplantation. The average waiting time for a deceased donor kidney was 18.5 (range 3–36) months. Full time dietetic support was available in six of the 14 units. There was no social worker, psychology, play therapy or teaching support in three, two, seven and four units, respectively. Assessment by other members of the multidisciplinary team and home visits before choice of therapy was carried out in 50 % of units, and although all patients were discussed at team meetings, the medical opinion predominated. In terms of types of RRT, 50 % of patients were commenced on chronic peritoneal dialysis (PD), 34 % on haemodialysis (HD) and 16 % underwent pre-emptive transplantation (PET). Chronic PD predominated in patients aged <5 years and HD predominated in those aged >10 years. Patient and family choice and age or size of patient were predominant factors in choice of therapy with a predictable decline in renal function favouring PET and social factors HD.

Conclusions

Chronic peritoneal dialysis predominated as primary choice of RRT, especially in younger children. The PET rates remain low. The influence of surgeons predominanted, and national transplant rules may be significant. Most units had insufficient multiprofessional support, which may impact upon initial choice of therapy as well as sustaining families through RRT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Watson AR, Gartland C, on behalf of the European Pediatric Peritoneal Dialysis Working Group (2001) Guidelines by an ad hoc European committee for elective chronic peritoneal dialysis in pediatric patients. Perit Dial Int 21:240–244

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fischbach M, Edefonti A, Schroder C, Watson A, The European Pediatric Dialysis Working Group (2005) Hemodialysis in children: general practical guidelines. Pediatr Nephrol 20:1054–1066

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. British Association for Pediatric Nephrology (2003) Review of multi-professional pediatric nephrology services in the UK—towards standards and equity of care. Report of a Working Party of the British Association for Pediatric Nephrology. British Association for Pediatric Nephrology, Nottingham

  4. Tjaden L, Tong A, Henning P, Groothoff J, Craig JC (2012) Children’s experiences of dialysis: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Arch Dis Child 97:395–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rees L (2009) Long-term outcome after renal transplantation in childhood. Pediatr Nephrol 24:475–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Abecassis M, Bartlett ST, Collins AJ, Davis CL, Delmonico FL, Friedewald JJ, Hays R, Howard A, Jones E, Leichtman AB, Merion RM, Metzger RA, Pradel F, Schweitzer EJ, Velez RL, Gaston RS (2008) Kidney transplantation as primary therapy for end-stage renal disease: a National Kidney Foundation/Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF/KDOQI) Conference. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 3:471–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sinha R, Marks SD (2010) Comparison of parameters of chronic kidney disease following pediatric preemptive versus non-preemptive renal transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 14:583–588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mehrotra R (2011) Choice of dialysis modality. Kidney Int 80:909–911

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Neu AM, Sander A, Borzych-Duzalka D, Watson AR, Valles PG, Ha IS, Patel H, Askenazi D, Balasz-Chmielewska I, Lauronen J, Groothoff JW, Feber J, Schaefer F, Warady BA, IPPN investigators (2012) Comorbidities in chronic pediatric peritoneal dialysis patients: a report of the International Pediatric Peritoneal Dialysis Network. Perit Dial Int 32:410–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vidal E, Edefonti A, Murer L, Gianoglio B, Maringhini S, Pecoraro C, Sorino P, Leozappa G, Lavoratti G, Ratsch IM, Chimenz R, Verrina E, Italian Registry of Pediatric Chronic Dialysis (2012) Peritoneal dialysis in infants: the experience of the Italian Registry of Pediatric Chronic Dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 27:385–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zurowska AM, Fischbach M, Watson AR, Edefonti A, Stefanidis CJ, on behalf of the European Pediatric Dialysis Working Group (2012) Clinical practice recommendations for the care of infants with stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD5). Pediatr Nephrol. doi:10.1007/s00467-012-2300-z

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schoenmaker NJ, Tromp WF, van der Lee JH, Adams B, Bouts AH, Collard L, Cransberg K, van Damme-Lombaerts R, Godefroid N, van Hoeck KJ, Koster-Kamphuis L, Lilien MR, Raes A, Groothoff JW (2012) Disparities in dialysis treatment and outcomes for Dutch and Belgian children with immigrant parents. Pediatr Nephrol. doi:10.1007/s00467-012-2135-7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Furth SL, Powe NR, Hwang W, Neu AM, Fivush BA (1997) Racial differences in choice of dialysis modality for children with end-stage renal disease. Pediatrics 99:E6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vonesh EF, Snyder JJ, Foley RN, Collins AJ (2006) Mortality studies comparing peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: what do they tell us? Kidney Int Suppl 103:S3–S11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jager KJ, Korevaar JC, Dekker FW, Krediet RT, Boeschoten FW, Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis (NECOSAD) Study Group (2004) The effect of contraindications and patient preference on dialysis modality selection in ESRD patients in The Netherlands. Am J Kidney Dis 43:891–899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Watson AR (1995) Strategies to support the families of children with end stage renal failure. Pediatr Nephrol 9:628–631

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Report of a Working Party of Royal College of paediatrics and Child Health, British Association for Pediatric Nephrology and NHS Kidney Care (2011) Improving the standards of care of children with kidney disease through pediatric nephrology networks. www.rcpch.ac.uk/networks accessed 20/2/13

  18. Hayes WN, Watson AR, Callaghan N, Wright E, Stefanidis CJ, on behalf of the European Pediatric Dialysis Working Group (2012) Vascular access: choice and complications in European pediatric hemodialysis units. Pediatr Nephrol 27:999–1004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chand DH, Valentini RP (2008) International pediatric fistula first initiative: a call to action. Am J Kidney Dis 51:1016–1024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Department of Health (2010) Achieving equity and excellence for children. London: Department of Health, London. Available at: www.gov.uk/government/publications/achieving-equity-and-excellence-for-children. Accessed 2 Mar 2013

  21. Watson AR, Harden PN, Ferris ME, Kerr PG, Mahan JD, Fouad RM, Consensus panel members (2011) Transition from pediatric to adult renal services: a consensus statement by the International Society of Nephrology (ISN) and the International Pediatric Nephrology Association (IPNA) Pediatr Nephrol 10:1735–1737

    Google Scholar 

  22. Boehm M, Winkelmayer WC, Arbeiter K, Mueller T, Aufricht C (2010) Late referral to pediatric renal failure service impairs access to pre-emptive kidney transplantation in children. Arch Dis Child 95:634–638

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Norman LJ, Macdonald IA, Watson AR (2004) Optimising nutrition in chronic renal insufficiency—growth. Pediatr Nephrol 19:1245–1252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rees L, Jones H (2013) Nutritional management and growth in children with chronic kidney disease. Pediatr Nephrol 28:527–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Norman L, Coleman JE, Watson AR (1995) Nutritional management in a child on chronic peritoneal dialysis: a team approach. J Hum Nutr Diet 8:209–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Watson AR (1997) Stress and burden of care in families with children commencing renal replacement therapy. In: Khanna R (ed) Advances in peritoneal dialysis, vol 13. Peritoneal Dialysis Publications, Toronto, pp 300–304

    Google Scholar 

  27. Aldridge MD (2008) How do families adjust to having a child with chronic kidney failure? A systematic review. Nephrol Nurse J 35:157–162

    Google Scholar 

  28. Buyan N, Turkmen MA, Bilge I, Baskin E, Haberal M, Bilginer Y, Mir S, Emre S, Akman S, Ozkaya O, Fidan K, Alpay H, Kavukcu S, Sever L, Ozcakar ZB, Dogrucan N (2010) Quality of life in children with chronic kidney disease (with child and parent assessments). Pediatr Nephrol 25:1487–1496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Boulware LE, Hill-Briggs F, Kraus ES, Melancon JK, Falcone B, Ephraim PL, Jaar BG, Gimenez L, Choi M, Senga M, Kolotos M, Lewis-Boyer L, Cook C, Light L, Depasquale N, Noletto T, Powe NR (2013) Effectiveness of educational and social worker interventions to actvate patients’ discussion and pursuit of preemptive living donor kidney transplantation: a randomised controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis 61:476–486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Duquette PJ, Hooper SR, Wetherington CE, Icard PF, Gipson DS (2007) Brief report: intellectual and academic functioning in pediatric chronic kidney disease. J Pediatr Psychol 32:1011–1017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Watson AR (2004) Hospital youth work and adolescent support. Arch Dis Child 89:440–442

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hilton D, Jepson S (2012) Evolution of a youth work service n hospital. Nurs Child Young People 24:14–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ellis EN, Blaszak C, Wright S, Van Lierop A (2012) Effectiveness of home visits to pediatric peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int 32:419–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lee A, Gudex C, Povlsen JV, Bonnevie B, Nielsen CP (2008) Patients’ views regarding choice of dialysis modality. Nephrol Dial Transplant 23:3953–3959

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wright Nunes JA, Wallston KA, Eden SK, Shintani AK, Ikizler TA, Cavanaugh KL (2011) Associations among perceived and objective disease knowledge and satisfaction with physician communication in patients with chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 80:1344–1351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tuot DS, Plantinga LC (2011) What patients don’t know may hurt them: knowledge and the perception of knowledge among patients with CKD. Kidney Int 80:1256–1257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Collier J, Pattison H, Watson AR, Sheard C (2001) Parental information needs in chronic renal failure and diabetes mellitus. Eur J Paediatr 160:31–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Alexander RT, Foster BJ, Tonelli MA, Soo A, Nettel-Aguirre A, Hemmelgarn BR, Samuel SM, Pediatric Renal Outcomes Group Canada (2012) Survival and transplantation outcomes of children less than 2 years of age with end-stage renal disease. Pediatr Nephrol 27:1975–1983

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Shooter M, Watson AR (1999) Withholding and withdrawing therapy in children. Brit J Ren Med 4:6–8

    Google Scholar 

  40. Schaefer F, Borzych-Duzalka D, Azocar M, Munarriz RL, Sever L, Aksu N, Barbosa LS, Galan YS, Xu H, Coccia PA, Szabo A, Wong W, Salim R, Vidal E, Pottoore S, Warady BA, IPPN investigators (2012) Impact of global economic disparities on practices and outcomes of chronic peritoneal dialysis in children: insights from the International Pediatric Peritoneal Dialysis Network Registry. Perit Dial Transplant 32:399–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ajarmeh S, Er L, Brin G, Djurdjev O, Dionne JM (2012) The effect of a multidisciplinary care clinic on the outcomes in pediatric chronic kidney disease. Pediatr Nephrol 27:1921–1927

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Menon S, Valentini R, Kapur G, Layfield S, Mattoo T (2009) Effectiveness of multidisciplinary clinic in managing children with chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 4:1170–1175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Filler G, Lipshultz SE (2012) Why multidisciplinary clinics should be the standard for treating chronic kidney disease. Pediatr Nephrol 27:1831–1834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Edefonti A, Boccola S, Picca M, Paglialonga F, Ardissino G, Marra G, Ghio L, Parisotto MT (2003) Treatment data during pediatric home peritoneal teledialysis. Pediatr Nephrol 18:560–564

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Cargill A, Watson AR (2003) Telecare support for patients undergoing chronic peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 23:91–94

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. May CR, Finch TL, Cornford J, Exley C, Gately C, Kirk S, Jenkings KN, Osbourne J, Robinson AL, Rogers A, Wilson R, Muir FS (2011) Integrating telecare for chronic disease management in the community: what needs to be done? BMC Health Serv Res 11:131. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-11-131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan R. Watson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watson, A.R., Hayes, W.N., Vondrak, K. et al. Factors influencing choice of renal replacement therapy in European Paediatric Nephrology Units. Pediatr Nephrol 28, 2361–2368 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-013-2555-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-013-2555-z

Keywords

Navigation