Abstract
Background
Primary hyperoxaluria (PH) is a recognised cause of nephrolithiasis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the success of extracorporal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in treating nephrolithiasis in children with PH.
Methods
This was a retrospective review of patient characteristics, treatments and outcomes of 36 children with oxalate stones due to PH.
Results
A total of 52 stones were formed in 28 patients, of which 23 stones were treated with ESWL. Of these 23 stones, ten improved and 13 did not; nine were located in the upper pole, nine in the lower pole and four and one in the pelvic and ureteric areas, respectively. All pelvic and ureteric stones improved, while 66.7 % of upper pole stones and 89.9 % of lower pole stones did not; 20 % of PH type 1 stones improved compared to 47 % of PH type 2 stones. The mean pre- and post-eGFR in stone-improvers was 98.82 and 104.7 ml/min/1.73 m2, respectively; in the non-improvers, these values were 100.75 and 95.68 ml/min/1.73 m2, respectively. Mean pre-ESWL stone size in the improved and non-improved groups was 7.3 mm and 8.5 mm respectively.
Conclusions
Based on our results, ESWL is not the ideal method of stone therapy for patients with PH. ESWL was more effective in treating pelvic and ureteric stones, with upper pole stone response being better than lower pole response. PH2 patients were more than twice as likely to respond to ESWL treatment. Stone size and prior preventive treatment did not affect outcome. eGFR was not affected by ESWL.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cochat P, Liutkus A, Fargue S, Basmaison O, Ranchin B, Rolland MO (2006) Primary hyperoxaluria type 1: still challenging! Pediatr Nephrol 21:1075–1081
Pais VM Jr, Assimos DG (2005) Pitfalls in the management of patients with primary hyperoxaluria: a urologist’s perspective. Urol Res 33:390–393
Matlaga BR, Assimos DG (2002) Changing indications for open stone surgery. Urology 59:490–493
Boddy S-A M, Duffy PG, Barratt TM, Whitefield HM (1988) Hyperoxaluria and renal calculi in children: the role of extracorporal shock wave lithotripsy? J R Soc Med 81:604–605
Smaldone MC, Corcoran AT, Docimo SG, Ost MC (2009) Endourological management of pediatric stone disease: present status. J Urol 181:17–28
Landau EH, Shenfeld OZ, Pode D, Shapiro A, Meretyk S, Katz G, Katz R, Duvdevani M, Hardak B, Cipele H, Hidas G, Yutkin V, Gofrit ON (2009) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in prepubertal children: 22-year experience at a single institution with a single lithotriptor. J Urol 182:1835–1839
Nelson CP, Diamond DA, Cendron M, Peters CA, Cilento BG (2008) Extracorporal shock wave lithotripsy in pediatric patients using late generation lithotriptor: experience at children’s hospital boston. J Urol 180:1865–1868
D’Addessi A, Bongiovanni L, Sasso F, Gulino G, Falabella R, Bassi P (2008) Extracorporal shockwave lithotripsy in paediatrics. J Endourol 22:1–12
Penn HA, DeMarco RT, Sherman AK, Gatti JM, Murphy JP (2009) Extracorporal shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi. J Urol 182:1824–1827
Kamoun A, Daudon M, Zghal A, Lasram L, Ben Maiz H, Belkahia C, Lakhoua R (1997) Primary hyperoxaluria: Tunisian experience apropos of 24 pediatric cases. Nephrologie 18:59–64
Albala DM, Assimos DG, Clayman RV, Denstedt JD, Grasso M, Gutierrez-Aceves J, Kahn RI, Leveillee RJ, Lingeman JE, Macaluso JN Jr, Munch LC, Nakada SY, Newman RC, Pearle MS, Preminger GM, Teichman J, Woods JR (2001) Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis-initial results. J Urol 166:2072–2080
Assimos DG, Leslie SW, Ng C, Streem SB, Hart LJ (2002) The impact of cystinuria on renal function. J Urol 168:27–30
Kerbl K, Clayman RV (2000) Endourologic treatment of nephrocalcinosis. Urology 56:508
Daudon M, Estepa L, Lacour B, Jungers P (1998) Unusual morphology of calcium oxalate calculi in primary hyperoxaluria. J Nephrol 11:51–55
Williams JC, Saw KC, Paterson RF, Hatt EK, McAteer JA, Lingeman JE (2003) Variability of renal stone fragility in shock wave lithotripsy. Urology 61:1092–1096
Costa-Bauzá A, Perelló J, Isern B, Grases F (2005) An experimental study on residual lithiasis after shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Res 33:51–56
Connors BA, Evan AP, Willis LR, Blomgren PM, Lingeman JE, Fineberg NS (2000) The effect of discharge voltage on renal injury and impairment caused by lithotripsy in the pig. J Am Soc Nephrol 11:310–318
Jewett MA, Bombardier C, Logan AG, Psihramis KE, Wesley-James T, Mahoney JE, Luymes JJ, Ibañez D, Ryan MR, Honey RJ (1998) A randomized controlled trial to assess the incidence of new onset hypertension in patients after shock wave lithotripsy for asymptomatic renal calculi. J Urol 160:1241–1243
Janetschek G, Frauscher F, Knapp R, Höfle G, Peschel R, Bartsch G (1997) New onset hypertension after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: age related incidence and prediction by intrarenal resistive index. J Urol 158:346–351
Willis LR, Evan AP, Connors BA, Blomgren PM, Fineberg NS, Lingeman JE (1999) Relationship between kidney size, renal injury, and renal impairment induced by shock wave lithotripsy. J Am Soc Nephrol 10:1753–1762
Poumand G, Baradaran N, Salem S, Ahmadi H, Mehrsai A, Hematian MA (2008) Extracorporal shock wave lithotripsy and its effect on renal function, assessed by 99m technetium dethylene-tiamine-pentaacetic acid scintigraphy. J Urol 179:464, Abstract 1355
Xue YQ, He DL, Chen XF, Li X, Zeng J, Wang XY (2009) Shock wave induced kidney injury promotes calcium oxalate deposition. J Urol 182:762–765
Joseph P, Mandal AK, Singh SK, Mandal P, Sankhwar SN, Sharma SK (2002) Computerized tomography attenuation value of renal calculus: can it predict successful fragmentation of the calculus by extracorporal shock wave lithotripsy? A preliminary study. J Urol 167:1968–1971
Semins MJ, Trock BJ, Matlaga BR (2008) The effect of shock wave rate on the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy: a meta-Analysis. J Urol 179:194–197
Evan AP, McAteer JA, Connors BA, Blomgren PM, Lingeman JE (2007) Renal injury during shock wave lithotripsy is significantly reduced by slowing the rate of shock wave delivery. BJU Int 100:624–627
Owen NR, Bailey MR, Sapozhnikov OA (2008) A passive technique to monitor stone comminution during shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 179:434, Abstract 1267
Colombo JR, Cocuzza M, Ganpule A (2008) A Flexible uretroscopic Holmium YAG lithotripsy for upper tract stones: a multicentric analysis. J Urol 179:435, Abstract 1269
Zeren S, Satar N, Bayazit AK, Bayazit AK, Payasli K, Ozkeceli R (2002) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of pediatric renal calculi. J Endourol 16:75–78
Keeley FX Jr, Assimos DG (2009) Clinical trials of the surgical management of urolithiasis: current status and future needs. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 16:65–69
Sung YM, Choo SW, Jeon SS, Shin SW, Park KB, Do YS (2006) The “Mini-Perc” technique of percutaneous nephrolithotomy with 14-Fr peel-away sheath: 3 year results in 72 patients. Korean J Radiol 7:50–56
Jackman SV, Hedican SP, Peters CA, Docimo SG (1998) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in infants and preschool aged children: experience with a new technique. Urology 52:697–701
Türk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Straub M (2011) Guidelines on urolithiasis. Uroweb 2011. Available at: http://www.uroweb.org/gls/pockets/english/20%20Urolithiasis.pdf
Straub M, Gschwend J, Zorn C (2010) Pediatric urolithiasis: the current surgical management. Pediatr Nephrol 25:1239–1244
Li B, Zhou W, Li P (1995) Protective effects of nifedipine and allopurinol on high energy shock wave induced acute changes of renal function. J Urol 153:596–598
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Al-Abadi, E., Hulton, SA. Extracorporal shock wave lithotripsy in the management of stones in children with oxalosis—still the first choice?. Pediatr Nephrol 28, 1085–1089 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-013-2424-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-013-2424-9