Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Model reduction in elastoplasticity: proper orthogonal decomposition combined with adaptive sub-structuring

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Model reduction techniques such as the proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) method can be used to reduce the computational effort of simulations with a very large number of degrees-of-freedom. The reduction of finite element models including elastoplastic material behavior is still far from being trivial and inevitably leads to problems of efficiency and accuracy. One aim of the present paper is to combine the two methods—sub-structuring and POD-based model reduction—to overcome these difficulties. A typical field of application where plasticity dominates the material behavior are forming processes. The second aim of the paper is to investigate the applicability of the new approach in this context. The presented combined approach selective POD (SPOD) where the reduction is only applied in sub-domains with approximately elastic behavior shows higher accuracy than the general POD method. In this paper, the SPOD method is extended by an adaptive method of sub-structuring (A-SPOD) in which the sub-domain where model reduction is applied is determined automatically. While achieving errors of the same magnitude as by means of SPOD, the computational effort can be reduced significantly by using the A-SPOD approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, USA, www.ce.berkeley.edu/projects/feap.

References

  1. Antil H, Heinkenschloss M, Hoppe R, Sorensen D (2010) Domain decomposition and model reduction for the numerical solution of pde constrained optimization problems with localized optimization variables. Comput Vis Sci 13(6):249–264. doi:10.1007/s00791-010-0142-4

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Antil H, Heinkenschloss M, Hoppe RHW (2011) Domain decomposition and balanced truncation model reduction for shape optimization of the stokes system. Optim Methods Softw 26(4–5):643–669. doi:10.1080/10556781003767904

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Baiges J, Codina R, Idelsohn S (2013) A domain decomposition strategy for reduced order models. application to the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 267(0):23–42. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2013.08.001.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berkooz G, Holmes P, Lumley JL (1993) The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 25:539–575

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Bolzon G, Buljak V (2011) An effective computational tool for parametric studies and identification problems in materials mechanics. Comput Mech 48:675–687. doi:10.1007/s00466-011-0611-8

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Brunssen S, Wohlmuth B (2009) An overlapping domain decomposition method for the simulation of elastoplastic incremental forming processes. Int J Numer Methods Eng 77(9):1224–1246. doi:10.1002/nme.2450

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Chatterjee A (2000) An introduction to the proper orthogonal decomposition. Curr Sci 78(7):808–817

    Google Scholar 

  8. Craig R, Bampton MCC (1968) Coupling of substructures for dynamic analysis. AIAA J 6(7):1313–1319

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Dogan F, Serdar Celebi M (2011) Real-time deformation simulation of non-linear viscoelastic soft tissues. Simulation 87:179–187. doi:10.1177/0037549710364532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Farhat C, Pierson K, Lesoinne M (2000) The second generation FETI methods and their application to the parallel solution of large-scale linear and geometrically non-linear structural analysis problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 184(2–4):333–374. doi:10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00234-0.

  11. Fukunaga K (1990) Introduction to statistical pattern recognition. Academic Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Galland F, Gravouil A, Malvesin E, Rochette M (2011) A global model reduction approach for 3d fatigue crack growth with confined plasticity. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200(5–8):699–716. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2010.08.018.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ganapathysubramanian S, Zabaras N (2004) Design across length scales: a reduced-order model of polycrystal plasticity for the control of microstructure-sensitive material properties. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193(45–47):5017–5034. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2004.04.004.

  14. Gosselet P, Rey C (2006) Non-overlapping domain decomposition methods in structural mechanics. Archiv Comput Methods Eng 13(4):515–572. doi:10.1007/BF02905857

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Hadoush A, van den Boogaard A (2008) Time reduction in implicit single point incremental sheet forming simulation by refinement–derefinement. Int J Mater Form 1(1):1167–1170. doi:10.1007/s12289-008-0188-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hadoush A, van den Boogaard A (2012) Efficient implicit simulation of incremental sheet forming. Int J Numer Methods Eng 90(5):597–612. doi:10.1002/nme.3334

    Google Scholar 

  17. Han TY, Abel JF (1985) Adaptive substructuring techniques in elasto-plastic finite element analysis. Comput Struct 20(1–3), 181–192. doi:10.1016/0045-7949(85)90067-7. (Special Issue: Advances and Trends in Structures and Dynamics)

  18. Hurty WC (1965) Dynamic analysis of structural systems using component modes. AIAA J 3(4):678–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Huynh DBP, Knezevic DJ, Patera AT (2013) A static condensation reduced basis element method : approximation and a posteriori error estimation. ESAIM. Math Modell Numer Anal 47:213–251. doi:10.1051/m2an/2012022

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Kerfriden P, Gosselet P, Adhikari S, Bordas S (2011) Bridging proper orthogonal decomposition methods and augmented newtonkrylov algorithms: An adaptive model order reduction for highly nonlinear mechanical problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200(5–8):850–866. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2010.10.009.

  21. Kerfriden P, Passieux JC, Bordas SPA (2012) Local/global model order reduction strategy for the simulation of quasi-brittle fracture. Int J Numer Methods Eng 89(2):154–179. doi:10.1002/nme.3234

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Kerschen G, Golinval JC, Vakakis A, Bergman L (2005) The method of proper orthogonal decomposition for dynamical characterization and order reduction of mechanical systems: An overview. Nonlinear Dyn 41(1–3):147–169. doi:10.1007/s11071-005-2803-2

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Kiliclar Y, Laurischkat R, Reese S, Meier H (2011) The simulation of robot based incremental sheet metal forming by means of a new solid-shell finite element technology and a finite elastoplastic model with combined hardening. Key Eng Mater 473:875–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. LeGresley PA, Alonso JJ (2003) Dynamic domain decomposition and error correction for reduced order models. In. In AIAA 41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting

  25. Loève M (1963) Probability theory. The University Series in Higher Mathematics, Princeton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Markovic D, Ibrahimbegovic A, Park K (2009) Partitioning based reduced order modelling approach for transient analyses of large structures. Eng Comput 26(1/2):46–68. doi:10.1108/02644400910924807

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Meier H, Laurischkat R, Bertsch C, Reese S (2009) Prediction of path deviation in robot based incremental sheet metal forming by means of an integrated finite element multi body system model. Key Eng Mater 410–411:365–372. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.410-411.365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Park K, Yang DY (2000) Mismatching refinement with domain decomposition for the analysis of steady-state metal forming process. Int J Numer Methods Eng 48(7):1089–1106

    Google Scholar 

  29. Qingchun Y, Shengnian Q, Qi Z, Naiyan M (1997) FE simulation method for a forging system. J Mater Process Technol 63(1–3):678–683. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(96)02706-9

    Google Scholar 

  30. Quigley E, Monaghan J (2002) The finite element modelling of conventional spinning using multi-domain models. J Mater Process Technol 124(3):360–365. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00259-5

    Google Scholar 

  31. Radermacher A, Reese S (2013) A comparison of projection-based model reduction concepts in the context of nonlinear biomechanics. Arch Appl Mech 83(8):1193–1213. doi:10.1007/s00419-013-0742-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Radermacher A, Reese S (2013) Proper orthogonal decomposition based model reduction for nonlinear biomechanical analysis. Int J Mater Eng Innov 4(2):149–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Radermacher A, Reese S, Hadoush A (2013) Selective proper orthogonal decomposition model reduction for forming simulations. PAMM 13(1):115–116. doi:10.1002/pamm.201310053

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ryckelynck D, Benziane DM (2010) Multi-level a priori hyper-reduction of mechanical models involving internal variables. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(17–20):1134–1142. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2009.12.003

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sirovich L, Kirby M, Winter M (1990) An eigenfunction approach to large scale transitional structures in jet flow. Phys Fluids A 2:127–136. doi:10.1063/1.857815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Taylor R (2011) Feap: a finite element analysis program, Version 8.3 User manual. University of California at Berkeley. www.ce.berkeley.edu/projects/feap. Accessed 4 May 2011

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) and A. Hadoush from the Hashemite University, Jordan. The first ideas of the SPOD method were developed during an international collaboration between the authors and A. Hadoush funded by DFG.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Applied Mechanics, RWTH Aachen University, Mies-van-der-Rohe-Str. 1, 52074 , Aachen, Germany

    Annika Radermacher & Stefanie Reese

Authors
  1. Annika Radermacher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stefanie Reese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annika Radermacher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Radermacher, A., Reese, S. Model reduction in elastoplasticity: proper orthogonal decomposition combined with adaptive sub-structuring. Comput Mech 54, 677–687 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-1020-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-1020-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation