Skip to main content
Log in

Exposure for laparoscopic cholecystectomy dissection adversely alters biliary ductal anatomy

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Exposure for open cholecystectomy entails lateral, caudal traction on the gallbladder infundibulum, which results in opening the angle between the cystic and hepatic ducts. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), as initially described, is done with cephalad traction on the gallbladder. We hypothesized LC exposure technique narrows the angle between the cystic and hepatic ducts, placing them at increased risk of injury.

Methods

Twenty-three patients had routine LC. Cystic duct cholangiography (IOC) was done with a flexible 5-Fr catheter via a percutaneous introducer placed anterior to the gallbladder. Exposure of Calot’s triangle was maintained with cephalad traction on the gallbladder fundus. IOC was repeated after allowing the organ to assume the anatomic position. The cholangiograms were inspected for significant differences, and the angle of the cystic to the hepatic duct (CDHD) was measured by a blinded radiologist.

Results

The mean angle of the cystic to hepatic duct was 30‡ ± 19‡ in the IOCs taken with cephalad traction on the gallbladder fundus vs 59‡ ± 22‡,P < 0.001, in the cholangiograms taken without traction. A filling defect at the cystic-hepatic duct junction was present in 39% of IOC taken with traction vs none without traction. The intrahepatic ducts were seen in all films without traction, whereas the intrahepatic ducts were not visualized in 13% of IOCs taken with traction.

Conclusions

From these data we conclude (1) extrahepatic biliary ducts may be at increased risk of injury during LC because of the exposure technique and (2) imaging bile ducts in the anatomic position may convey misleading information about the relative location of important structures. Optimal exposure for dissection of Calot’s triangle should utilize a second clamp on the infundibulum with lateral, caudal traction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asbun HJ, Rossi RL, Lowell JA, Munson JL (1993) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: mechanism of injury, prevention, and management. World J Surg 17: 547–552

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bernard HR, Hartman TW (1993) Complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 165: 533–535

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. The Soutern Surgeon’s Club (1991) A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. N Engl J Med 324: 1073–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Crist DW, Gadacz TR (1993) Laparoscopic anatomy of the biliary tree. Surg Clin North Am 73: 785–798

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Davidoff AM, Pappas TN, Murray EA, Hilleren DJ, Johnson RD, Baker ME, Newman GE, Cotton PB, Meyers WC (1992) Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 215: 196–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hunter J (1991) Avoidance of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 162: 71–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Larson GM, Vitale GC, Casey J, Evans JS, Gilliam G, Heuser L, McGee G, Rao M, Scherm MJ, Voyles CR (1992) Multipractice analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 163: 221–226

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Legrorreta AP, Silber JH, Costantino GN, Kobylinski RW, Zatz SL (1993) Increased cholecystectomy rate after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JAMA 270: 1429–1432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McIntyre RC Jr, Zoeter MA, Weil KC, Cohen MM (1992) Comparison of outcome and cost of open cholecystectomy vs. laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg 2: 143–147

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Soper NJ, Brunt LM, Kerbl K (1994) Laparoscopic general surgery. N Engl J Med 330: 409–419

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Soper NJ, Flye MW, Brunt LM, Stockman PT, Sicard GA, Picus D, Edmundowicz SA, Aliperti G (1993) Diagnosis and management of biliary complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 165: 663–669

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Soper NJ, Stockman PT, Dunnegan DL, Ashley SW (1992) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the new “gold standard?” Arch Surg 127: 917–923

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Steiner CA, Bass EB, Talamani MA, Pitt HA, Steinberg EP (1994) Surgical rates and operative mortality for open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Maryland. N Engl J Med 330: 403–408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mclntyre, R.C., Bensard, D.D., Stiegmann, G.V. et al. Exposure for laparoscopic cholecystectomy dissection adversely alters biliary ductal anatomy. Surg Endosc 10, 41–43 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649910010

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649910010

Key words

Navigation