Abstract
Background
Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has been associated with a faster recovery and less postoperative pain than the open technique. However, few data are available on the clinical outcome of LA in overweight patients.
Methods
A group of 106 patients with a body mass index (BMI) > 26.4, representing the upper quintile of 500 prospectively randomized patients, were included in the study. They were randomized to undergo either laparoscopic or open appendectomy (OA). Operating and anesthesia times, postoperative pain, complications, hospital stay, functional index (1 week postoperatively), sick leave, and time to full recovery were documented.
Results
In OA, the operating time for overweight patients was significantly longer than that for patients in the normal wieght range (40 vs 35 min, p < 0.05). In LA, there was no difference in operating time between the normal and overweight patients. Overweight patients who underwent LA had longer operating and anesthesia times than their OA counterparts (55 vs 40 min, p < 0.001; and 125 vs 100 min, p < 0.001, respectively). Postoperative pain was significantly greater in overweight patients who underwent OA than in those treated with the laparoscopic technique. Postoperative pain was also significantly greater in overweight patients subjected to OA than in patients of normal weight after 4 weeks; the clinical significance may, however, be of less importance since the values are low (0.26 vs 0.09, p<0.05). There were no significant differences between the two operating techniques in terms of complications. Hospital stay was longer for overweight patients than for normal-weight patients undergoing OA (3.0 vs 2.0, p<0.01). The functional index did not differ between any group of patients. Sick leave was longer for overweight patients who underwent OA than for normal-weight patients treated with the same technique (17 vs 13 days, p<0.01). In the laparoscopic group, however, there were no differences between the overweight and normal-weight patients. Time to full recovery was greater in overweight patients subjected to OA than in the overweight patients in the LA group (22 vs 15 days, p<0.001).
Conclusion
In this study, overweight patients who were submitted to LA had less postoperative pain and a faster postoperative recovery than overweight patients who had OA. LA also abolished some of the negative effects that overweight had on operating time, hospital stay, and sick leave with the open technique. However, anesthesia and operating times were significantly longer in LA for both overweight patients and those with a normal BMI.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Attwood SE, Hill AD, Murphy PG, Thornton J, Stephens RB (1992) A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Surgery 112: 497–501
Grundy SM (1998) Multifactorial causation of obesity: implications for prevention. Am J Clin Nutr 67: 563S-572S
Hansen JB, Smithers BM, Schache D, Wall DR, Miller BJ, Menzies BL (1996) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. World J Surg 20: 17–20; discussion 21
Hart R, Rajgopal C, Plewes A., Sweeney J., Davies W, Gray D, Taylor B (1996) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial of 81 patients. Can J Surg 39: 457–462
Hellberg A, Rudberg C, Kullman E, Enochsson L, Fenyo G, Graffner H, Hallerback B, Johansson B, Anderberg B, Wenner J, Ringqvist I, Sorensen S (1999) Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 86: 48–53
Kazemier G, de Zeeuw GR, Lange JF, Hop WCJ, Bonjer HJ (1997) Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy: a randomized clinical tria [see Comments] Surg Endosc 11: 336–340 DOI: 10.1007/s004649900358
Miles RH, Carballo RE, Prinz RA, McMahon M, Pulawski G, Olen RN, Dahlinghaus DL (1992) Laparoscopy: the preferred method of cholecystectomy in the morbidly obese. Surgery 114: 822–823
Minne L, Varner D, Burnell A, Ratzer E, Clark J, Haun W (1997) Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy: prospective randomized study of outcomes. Arch Surg 132: 708–711; discussion 712
Mutter D, Vix M, Bui A, Evrard S, Tassetti V, Breton JF, Marescaux J (1996) Laparoscopy not recommended for routine appendectomy in men: results of a prospective randomized study. Surgery 120: 71–74
Pasulka PS, Bistrian BR, Benotti PN, Blackburn GL (1986) The risks of surgery in obese patients. Ann Intern Med 104: 540–546
Reiertsen O, Larsen S, Trondsen E, Edwin B, Faerden AE, Rosseland AR (1997) Randomized controlled trial with sequential design of laparoscopic versus conventional appendicectomy. Br J Surg 84: 842–847
Richards KF, Fisher KS, Flores JH, Christensen BJ (1996) Laparoscopic appendectomy: comparison with open appendectomy in 720 patients. Surg Laparosc Endose 6: 205–209
Riley RH, Burke V (1997) Prevalence of obesity in surgical patients: a comparative survey in the United States and Australia. J Qual Clin Pract 17: 147–154
Velanovich V (1990) Ponderal index as a predictor of postoperative complications. Am Surg 56: 659–661
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Online publication: 6 February 2001
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Enochsson, L., Hellberg, A., Rudberg, C. et al. Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy in overweight patients. Surg Endosc 15, 387–392 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640000334
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640000334