Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Outcomes after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: does the number of previous recurrences matter? A prospective study

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

It is not yet clearly known whether laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) is superior to the open approach in recurrent hernias. The aim of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic technique for ventral hernias and investigate whether these outcomes are affected by the number of previous failed repairs.

Methods

Data from 124 consecutive patients who underwent LVHR using a standardized technique between September 2007 and June 2014 were collected prospectively. In all repairs, a composite prosthesis was tailored to overlap the defect by at least 5 cm and fixed with a double crown of spiral tacks. Clinical follow-up visits were performed at 1 week, 1, 6, and 12 months, and yearly thereafter. Patients were classified in 3 groups (0, 1, and ≥ 2) according to the number of previous hernia repairs for further statistical analysis.

Results

Long-term surveillance was available in 116 (93%) patients. Of these, 96 (82.8%) were recurrent hernias. There were 2 (1.7%) conversions, both in recurrent cases, and in 3 (2.6%) patients a hybrid access was used. Mean operating time was 55 min. There was an overall postoperative complication rate of 16%, with no mortality. During a mean follow-up of 30 (range 20–90) months, 3 (2.6%) recurrences were diagnosed 6, 8, and 9 months after surgery, respectively. A univariate analysis related to demographic, clinical, and perioperative variables did not find any significant relationship between the number of previous recurrences and operating time, conversion rate, hospital length of stay, overall morbidity, or recurrence.

Conclusions

This study suggests that laparoscopic approach in recurrent incisional hernias is a safe and feasible alternative to open techniques. Furthermore, our experience supports the idea that LVHR may be the best option for recurrent cases in properly selected patients, independently of the number of previous recurrences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mudge M, Hughes LE (1985) Incisional hernia: a 10-year prospective study of incidence and attitudes. Br J Surg 72:70–71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Perrone JM, Soper NJ, Eagon C, Klingensmith ME, Aft RL, Frisella MM, Brunt LM (2005) Perioperative outcomes and complications of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surgery 138:708–716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. LeBlanc KA, Booth WV (1993) Laparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: preliminary findings. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3:39–41

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. DeMaría EJ, Moss JM, Sugerman HJ (2000) laparoscopic intraperitoneal polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) prostethic patch repair of ventral hernia. Prospective comparison to open prefascial polypropylene mesh repair. Surg Endosc 14:326–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Carbajo MA, Martin del Olmo JC, Blanco JI, De la Cuesta C, Toledano M, Martin F, Vaquero C, Inglada L (1999) Laparoscopic treatment vs open surgery in the solution of major incisional and abdominal wall hernias with mesh. Surg Endosc 13:250–252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Holzman MD, Purut CM, Reintgen K, Eubanks S, Pappas TN (1997) Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernioplasty. Surg Endosc 11:32–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ramshaw BJ, Esartia P, Schwab J, Mason EM, Wilson RA, Duncan TD, Miller J, Lucas GW, Promes J (1999) Comparison of laparoscopic and open ventral herniorrhaphy. Am Surg 65:827–831

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Goodney PP, Birkmeyer CM, Birkmeyer JD (2002) Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repair. Arch Surg 137:1161–1165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Moreau PE, Helmy N, Vons C (2012) Laparoscopic treatment of incisional hernia. State of art in 2012. J Visc Surg 149:40–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Heniford BT, Park A, Ramshaw BJ, Voeller G (2003) Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias. Nine years´experience with 850 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 238:391–400

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Moreno-Egea A, Carrillo-Alcazar A, Aguayo-Albasini JL (2012) Is the outcome of laparoscopic incisional hernia affected by defect size? A prospetive study. Am J Surg 203:87–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Verbo A, Petito L, Manno A, Coco C, Mattana C, Lurati M, Pedretti G, Rizzo G, Sermoneta D, Lodoli C, Nunziata J, D´Ugo D (2007) Laparoscopic approach to recurrent incisional hernia repair: a 3-year experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 17:591–595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Uranues S, Salehi B, Bergamaschi R (2008) Adverse events, quality of life, and recurrence rates after laparoscopic adhesiolysis and recurrent incisional hernia mesh repair in patients with previous failed repairs. J Am Coll Surg 207:663–669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sturt NJ, Liao CC, Engledow AH, Menzies D, Motson RW (2011) Results of laparoscopic repair of primary and recurrent incisional hernias at a single UK institution. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 21:86–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hwang CS, Witchterman KA, Alfrey EJ (2009) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is safer tan the open repair: analysis of the NSQIP data. J Surg Res 156:213–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Burger J, Luijendijk R, Hop W, Halm J, Verdaasdonk E, Jeekel J (2004) Long-term follow up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240:578–583

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Jenkins ED, Yom VH, Melman L, Pierce RA, Schuessler RB, Frisella MM, Christopher Eagon J, Michael Brunt L, Matthews BD (2010) Clinical predictors of operative complexity in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a prospective study. Surg Endosc 24:1872–1877

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosen M, Brody F, Ponsky J, Walsh RM, Rosenblatt S, Duperier F, Fanning A, Siperstein A (2003) Recurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc 17:123–128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bencini L, Sanchez LJ, Boffi B, Farsi M, Scatizzi M, Moretti R (2003) Incisional hernia repair. Retrospective comparison of laparoscopic and open techniques. Surg Endosc 17:1546–1551

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Itani K, Hur K, Kim L, Anthony T, Berger D, Reda D, Neumayer L (2010) Comparison of laparoscopic and open repair with mesh for the treatment of ventral incisional hernia: a randomized trial. Arch Surg 145:322–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hesselink VJ, Luijendijk RW, de Wilt JH, Heide R, Jeekel J (1993) An evaluation of risk factors in incisional hernia recurrence. Surg Gynecol Obstet 176:228–234

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Forbes SS, Eskicioglu C, McLeod RS, Okrainec A (2009) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing open and laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with mesh. Br J Surg 96:851–858

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sajid MS, Bokhari SA, Mallick AS, Cheek E, Baig MK (2009) Laparoscopic versus open repair of incisional/ventral hernia: a meta-analysis. Am J Surg 197:64–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kapischke M, Schulz T, Schipper T, Tensfeldt J, Caliebe A (2008) Open versus laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: something different from a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 22:2251–2260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sauerland S, Walgenbach M, Habermalz B, Seiler CM, Miserez M (2011) Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD007781

  26. Carlson MA, Frantzides CT, Shostrom VK, Laguna LE (2008) Minimally invasive ventral herniorrhaphy: an analysis of 6266 published cases. Hernia 12:9–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Constanza MJ, Heniford BT, Arca MJ, Mayes JT, Gagner M (1998) Laparoscopic repair of recurrent ventral hernias. Am Surg 64:1121–1125. Discussion:1126–1127

    Google Scholar 

  28. Varghese TK, Denham DW, Dawes LG, Murayama KM, Prystowsky JB, Joehl RJ (2002) Laparoscospic ventral hernia repair: an institutional experience. J Surg Res 105:115–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. McKinlay RD, Park A (2004) Laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair: a more effective alternative to conventional repair of recurrent incisional hernia. J Gastrointest Surg 8:670–674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wassenaar EB, Schoenmaeckers EJ, Raymakers JT, Rakic S (2009) Recurrences after laparoscopic repair of ventral and incisional hernias: lessons learned from 505 repairs. Surg Endosc 23:825–832

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sharma A, Mehrotra M, Khullar R, Soni V, Baijal M, Chowbey PK (2011) Laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair: a single centre experience of 1242 patients over a period of 13 years. Hernia 15:131–139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Earle D, Roth S, Saber A, Haggerty S, Bradley JF III, Fanelli R, Price R, Richardson WS, Stefanidis D, SAGES Guidelines Committee (2016) SAGES guidelines for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc 30:3163–3183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Treviño JM, Franklin ME Jr, Berghoff KR, Glass JL, Jaramillo EJ (2006) Preliminary results of a two-layered prosthetic repair for recurrent inguinal and ventral hernias combining open and laparoscopic techniques. Hernia 10:253–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Griniatsos J, Eugenia Y, Anastasios T, Christos T, Theodoros D (2009) A hybrid technique for recurrent incisional hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19:177–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Olmi S, Scaini A, Cesana GC, Erba L, Croce E (2007) Laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair: an open randomized controlled study. Surg Endosc 21:555–559

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rogmark P, Petersson U, Bringman S, Eklund A, Ezra E, Sevonius D, Smedberg S, Osterberg J, Montgomery A (2013) Short-term outcomes for open and laparoscopic midline incisional hernia repair: a randomized multicenter controlled trial: the ProLOVE (prospective randomized trial on open versus laparoscopic operation of ventral eventrations) trial. Ann Surg 258:37–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Eker HH, Hansson BM, Buunen M, Janssen IM, Pierik RE, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2013) Laparoscopic vs. open incisional hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 148:259–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chelala E, Thoma M, Tatete B, Lemye AC, Dessily M, Alle JL (2007) The suturing concept for laparoscopic mesh fixation in ventral and incisional hernia repair: mid-term analysis of 400 cases. Surg Endosc 21:391–395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Picazo-Yeste J, Morandeira-Rivas A, Moreno-Sanz C (2013) Multilayer myofascial mesh repair for giant midline incisional hernias: a novel advantageous combination of old and new techniques. J Gastrointest Surg 17:1665–1672

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr Mark William Halliday MD, FRCS, for his assistance in the preparation and correction of style of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General and Digestive Surgery, La Mancha-Centro General Hospital, 13600, Alcázar de San Juan, Ciudad Real, Spain

    Carlos Moreno-Sanz, Cristina Sedano-Vizcaíno, Antonio Morandeira-Rivas & Francisco Sánchez-De Pedro

  2. Department of General Surgery, Sulaiman Medical Group, Al Takhassusi General Hospital, P.O. Box: 2000, Riyadh, 11393, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

    Joaquín Picazo-Yeste

Authors
  1. Joaquín Picazo-Yeste
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carlos Moreno-Sanz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cristina Sedano-Vizcaíno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Antonio Morandeira-Rivas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Francisco Sánchez-De Pedro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joaquín Picazo-Yeste.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Dr Joaquin Picazo-Yeste, Dr Carlos Moreno-Sanz, Dr Cristina Sedano-Vizcaíno, Dr Antonio Morandeira-Rivas, and Dr Francisco Sánchez-de Pedro have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Picazo-Yeste, J., Moreno-Sanz, C., Sedano-Vizcaíno, C. et al. Outcomes after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: does the number of previous recurrences matter? A prospective study. Surg Endosc 31, 4514–4521 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5510-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5510-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation