Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical predictors of operative complexity in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a prospective study

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Because of uncertainties about the complexity of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair for varying patient populations, surgeons may be reluctant to perform this procedure. This study aimed to delineate the risk factors that can be identified in the preoperative setting predictive of longer operative times and complexity in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Methods

Patient demographics including body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, previous laparoscopic and open surgical procedures, ventral hernia repairs, and hernia characteristics (defect size and location, adhesions, incarceration) were recorded prospectively. Data are given as mean ± standard deviation. Times (min) required for abdominal access, adhesiolysis, and mesh placement as well as the total operative time were recorded during each case as outcome measures of operative difficulty. Univariate analyses were performed with the t-test or the Mann–Whitney U test as well as multivariate analyses using the stepwise analysis of covariance model to determine demographic and clinical variables influencing operative times.

Result

The study enrolled 180 patients (78 men and 102 women) with a mean age of 54.8 ± 12.2 years and a mean BMI of 33.3 ± 13.0 kg/m2. Multivariate analysis demonstrated significantly longer (p < 0.05) adhesiolysis and total operative times for patients with prior ventral hernia repairs, suprapubic hernia, bowel adhesion to the abdominal wall or hernia sac, and larger hernia defect. The total operative time also was increased (p < 0.05) with incarcerated hernia contents. Mesh placement time was increased (p < 0.05) with incarcerated hernia contents, suprapubic hernia location, hernias requiring larger mesh for repair, and decreased postgraduate year of the surgical assistant. The time required to obtain abdominal access was longer (p < 0.05) with a greater BMI and a higher American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification. The operative times were not increased with a history of peritonitis, diabetes, immunosuppression, cancer, or with higher numbers of previous open or laparoscopic surgeries.

Conclusions

At least 10 preoperatively identifiable patient variables, either alone or in combination, are predictive of prolonged operative times during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair and may be used as surrogates to determine the complexity of a minimally invasive approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mudge M, Hughes LE (1985) Incisional hernia: a 10 year prospective study of incidence and attitudes. Br J Surg 72:70–71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Read RC, Yoder G (1989) Recent trends in the management of incisional herniation. Arch Surg 124:485–488

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sorensen LT, Hemmingsen UB, Kirkeby LT, Kallehave F, Jorgensen LN (2005) Smoking is a risk factor for incisional hernia. Arch Surg 140:119–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Winslow ER, Fleshman JW, Birnbaum EH, Brunt LM (2002) Wound complications of laparoscopic vs open colectomy. Surg Endosc 16:1420–1425

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Anthony T, Bergen PC, Kim LT, Henderson M, Fahey T, Rege RV, Turnage RH (2000) Factors affecting recurrence following incisional herniorrhaphy. World J Surg 24:95–100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, Halm JA, Verdaasdonk EG, Jeekel J (2004) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240:578–583

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, de Lange DC, Braaksma MM, IJzermans JN, Boelhouwer RU, de Vries BC, Salu MK, Wereldsma JC, Bruijninckx CM, Jeekel J (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343:392–398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Luijendijk RW, Lemmen MH, Hop WC, Wereldsma JC (1997) Incisional hernia recurrence following “vest-over-pants” or vertical Mayo repair of primary hernias of the midline. World J Surg 21:62–65

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. LeBlanc KA, Booth WV (1993) Laparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using expanded polytrafluoroethylene: preliminary findings. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3:39–41

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pierce RA, Spitler JA, Frisella MA, Matthews BD, Brunt LM (2007) Pooled data analysis of laparoscopic vs open ventral hernia repair: 14 years of patient data accrual. Surg Endosc 21:378–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gray SH, Vick CC, Graham LA, Finan KR, Neumayer LA, Hawn MT (2008) Risk of complications from enterotomy or unplanned bowel resection during elective hernia repair. Arch Surg 143:582–586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. van der Voort M, Heijnsdijk EA, Gouma DJ (2004) Bowel injury as a complication of laparoscopy. Br J Surg 91:1253–1258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Perrone JM, Soper NJ, Eagon JC, Klingensmith ME, Aft RL, Frisella MM, Brunt LM (2005) Perioperative outcomes and complications of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surgery 138:708–715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Der Krabben AA, Dijkstra FR, Niewenhuijzen M, Reijnen MM, Schaapveld M, Van Goor H (2000) Morbidity and mortality of inadvertent enterotomy during adhesiotomy. Br J Surg 87:467–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ellis H (1982) The causes and prevention of intestinal adhesions. Br J Surg 69:241–243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Felemovicius I, Bonsack ME, Delaney JP (2004) Prevention of adhesions to polypropylene mesh. J Am Coll Surg 198:543–548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Baptista ML, Bonsack ME, Delaney JP (2000) Seprafilm reduces adhesions to polypropylene mesh. Surgery 128:86–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Karakousis CP, Volpe C, Tanski J, Colby ED, Winston J, Driscoll DL (1995) Use of a mesh for musculoaponeurotic defects of the abdominal wall in cancer surgery and the risk of bowel fistulas. J Am Coll Surg 181:11–16

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Robinson TN, Clarke JH, Schoen J, Walsh MD (2005) Major mesh-related complications following hernia repair: events reported to the Food and Drug Administration. Surg Endosc 19:1556–1560

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Matthews BD, Pratt BL, Pollinger HS, Backus CL, Kercher KW, Sing RF, Heniford BT (2003) Assessment of adhesion formation to intra-abdominal polypropylene mesh and polytetrafluoroethylene mesh. J Surg Res 114:126–132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Luijendijk RW, de Lange DC, Wauters CC, Wauters CC, Hop WC, Duron JJ, Pailler JL, Camprodon BR, Holmdahl L, van Geldorp HJ, Jeekel J (1996) Foreign material in postoperative adhesions. Ann Surg 223:242–248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We recognize the efforts of Eve Payne, CST, and Wayne Winkler, RN, who coordinated the operative time recordings.

Disclosures

Eric D. Jenkins, Lora Melman, Richard A. Pierce, Richard B. Schuessler, Victoria H. Yom, Margaret M. Frisella have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose. J. Christopher Eagon has received consultant fees from Ethicon Endosurgery. L. Michael Brunt has received an honorarium for speaking and teaching, supplies for skills training, and grant support for clinical fellowship, and salary support from Ethicon Endosurgery; an honorarium for speaking and teaching and supplies for skills training from Covidien; grant support for education and training from both Stryker Endoscopy and Karl Storz Endoscopy; and grant support for research from Lifecell Corporation.. Brent D. Matthews has received consulting fees from Atrium Medical, Ethicon EndoSurgery, and the Muskuloskeletal Transplant Foundation, and an honorarium for speaking from W. L. Gore.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brent D. Matthews.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jenkins, E.D., Yom, V.H., Melman, L. et al. Clinical predictors of operative complexity in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a prospective study. Surg Endosc 24, 1872–1877 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0863-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0863-y

Keywords

Navigation