Skip to main content
Log in

Endoscopic subcutaneous component separation as an adjunct to abdominal wall reconstruction

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Proper defect closure during abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) is a key to improving cosmetic and functional results, and reducing morbidity. We have completed the initial prospective evaluation of a technique we previously described and published: endoscopic subcutaneous anterior component separation (ACS) as an adjunct to mainly laparoscopic AWR. We now present the long-term clinical and imaging follow-up results.

Study design

Data were prospectively collected over a 3-year period (2012–2015) on patients who underwent AWR with endoscopic ACS. Inclusion criteria included the following: defects of 6–15 cm that are longer than wider; no skin dystrophy; no loss of domain; no active infection; no previous multiple, complex repairs; no previous multiple mesh repairs; and no high probability of severe adhesions. All patients were followed up clinically at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and then annually. All patients underwent CT scanning of the abdominal wall (sagittal, axial, coronal, and 3D reconstruction) at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively and then annually.

Results

Twenty consecutive patients underwent adjunctive endoscopic ACS: 17 laparoscopic AWRs, 2 open repairs, and 1 hybrid repair. Up to 38 months (mean 21 months) of follow-up, there were no ventral hernia recurrences or de novo hernias at the ACS site. One patient experienced partial primary closure failure. Morbidity consisted in one case each of hematoma, seroma, and transient neuralgia. Cosmetic results and patient satisfaction were excellent.

Conclusion

We confirmed that endoscopic subcutaneous ACS is a safe, effective, reliable, reproducible technique that facilitates primary closure of defects during AWR in selected patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nguyen DH, Nguyen MT, Ashkenazy EP et al (2014) Primary fascial closure with laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: systematic review. World J Surg 38:3097–3104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ramirez OM, Ruas E, Dellon AL (1990) “Components separation” method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 86:519–526

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosen MJ, Jin J, McGee MF et al (2007) Laparoscopic component separation in the single stage treatment of infected abdominal wall prosthetic removal. Hernia 11:435–440

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Harth KC, Rosen MJ (2010) Endoscopic versus open component separation in complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Am J Surg 199:342–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Daes J (2014) Endoscopic subcutaneous approach to component separation. J Am Col Surg. 218:e1–e4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferretis M, Orchard P (2015) Minimally invasive component separation techniques in complex ventral abdominal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 25:100–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Daes J (2015) Standardization of hernia surgery (Letter to the Editor). Hernia 19:1039–1040

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Clapp ML, Hicks SC, Awad SS, Liang MK (2013) Trans-cutaneous closure of central defects (TCCD) in laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs (LVHR). World J Surg 37:42–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Banerjee A, Beck C, Narula VK et al (2012) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: does primary repair in addition to placement of mesh decrease recurrence? Surg Endosc 26:1264–1268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. den Hartog D, Eker HH, Tuinebreijer WE et al (2010) Isokinetic strength of the trunk flexor muscles after surgical repair for incisional hernia. Hernia 14:243–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gunnarsson U, Johansson M, Strigard K (2011) Assessment of abdominal muscle function using the Biodex System-4. Validity and reliability in healthy volunteers and patients with giant ventral hernia. Hernia 15:417–421

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge Daes.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Authors Jorge Daes and Rodolfo J. Dennis have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose pertaining to this publication.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Daes, J., Dennis, R.J. Endoscopic subcutaneous component separation as an adjunct to abdominal wall reconstruction. Surg Endosc 31, 872–876 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5045-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5045-0

Keywords

Navigation