Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer patients who underwent previous abdominal surgery

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery may be impeded by intraperitoneal adhesions caused by previous abdominal surgery. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of previous abdominal surgery on short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 3188 patients with primary colorectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery between January 2004 and December 2013. Patients with a history of abdominal surgery (n = 593, 18.6 %) were compared to those without such history (n = 2595, 81.4 %).

Results

Patients who had undergone previous abdominal surgery exhibited acceptable intraoperative outcomes, including conversion to open surgery, operative time, estimated blood loss, and the number of harvested lymph nodes. Overall, postoperative complication rates were similar between the groups (10.8 vs. 10.6 %, p = 0.885). Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with history of major abdominal surgery (n = 165) had higher rates of conversion to open surgery (4.2 vs. 1.7 %, p = 0.033), prolonged postoperative ileus (5.5 vs. 2.0 %, p = 0.008), and wound complications (4.2 vs. 1.2 %, p = 0.006), when compared to those without prior abdominal surgery. Previous major abdominal surgery was an independent risk factor for conversion to open surgery [adjusted odds ratio = 2.740; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.197–6.269]. Disease-free survival [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 0.847; 95 % CI 0.532–1.346] and overall survival (adjusted HR = 0.846; 95 % CI 0.432–1.657) were not observed to differ between the previous major abdominal surgery group and those without previous abdominal surgery.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in patients with a history of abdominal surgery exhibited acceptable short- and long-term outcomes. Patients with a history of previous abdominal surgery had relatively higher rate of conversion to open surgery as well as higher incidences of prolonged postoperative ileus and wound complications compared to patients without such history.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061–3068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, Nam BH, Choi HS, Kim DW, Lim SB, Lee TG, Kim DY, Kim JS, Chang HJ, Lee HS, Kim SY, Jung KH, Hong YS, Kim JH, Sohn DK, Kim DH, Oh JH (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11:637–645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Furst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jeong SY, Park JW, Nam BH, Kim S, Kang SB, Lim SB, Choi HS, Kim DW, Chang HJ, Kim DY, Jung KH, Kim TY, Kang GH, Chie EK, Kim SY, Sohn DK, Kim DH, Kim JS, Lee HS, Kim JH, Oh JH (2014) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 15:767–774

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Müller JM (2005) Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD003145. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003145.pub2

  8. Lee SY, Park KJ, Ryoo SB, Oh HK, Choe EK, Heo SC (2014) Early postoperative small bowel obstruction is an independent risk factor for subsequent adhesive small bowel obstruction in patients undergoing open colectomy. World J Surg 38:3007–3014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Aytac E, Stocchi L, De Long J, Costedio MM, Gorgun E, Kessler H, Remzi FH (2015) Impact of previous midline laparotomy on the outcomes of laparoscopic intestinal resections: a case-matched study. Surg Endosc 29:537–542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Law WL, Lee YM, Chu KW (2005) Previous abdominal operations do not affect the outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 19:326–330

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vignali A, Di Palo S, De Nardi P, Radaelli G, Orsenigo E, Staudacher C (2007) Impact of previous abdominal surgery on the outcome of laparoscopic colectomy: a case-matched control study. Tech Coloproctol 11:241–246

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Naguib N, Saklani A, Shah P, Mekhail P, Alsheikh M, AbdelDayem M, Masoud AG (2012) Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal resection in patients with previous abdominal operations. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22:468–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamamoto M, Okuda J, Tanaka K, Kondo K, Asai K, Kayano H, Masubuchi S, Uchiyama K (2013) Effect of previous abdominal surgery on outcomes following laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 56:336–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim IY, Kim BR, Kim YW (2015) Impact of prior abdominal surgery on rates of conversion to open surgery and short-term outcomes after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. PLoS One 10:e0134058

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim CH, Kim HJ, Huh JW, Kim YJ, Kim HR (2014) Learning curve of laparoscopic low anterior resection in terms of local recurrence. J Surg Oncol 110:989–996

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lim SW, Kim HJ, Kim CH, Huh JW, Kim YJ, Kim HR (2013) Umbilical incision laparoscopic colectomy with one additional port for colorectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 17:193–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A, Holm T, Wong WD, Tiret E, Moriya Y, Laurberg S, den Dulk M, van de Velde C, Buchler MW (2010) Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery 147:339–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee SY, Kang SB, Kim DW, Oh HK, Ihn MH (2015) Risk factors and preventive measures for acute urinary retention after rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg 39:275–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lim SW, Huh JW, Kim YJ, Kim HR (2013) Vertical transumbilical incision versus left lower transverse incision for specimen retrieval during laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Tech Coloproctol 17:59–65

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wiggins T, Markar SR, Harris A (2015) Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for acute small bowel obstruction: systematic review and pooled analysis. Surg Endosc 29:3432–3442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dindo D, Schafer M, Muller MK, Clavien PA, Hahnloser D (2010) Laparoscopy for small bowel obstruction: the reason for conversion matters. Surg Endosc 24:792–797

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kang SB, Park JS, Kim DW, Lee TG (2010) Intraoperative technical difficulty during laparoscopy-assisted surgery as a prognostic factor for colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1400–1408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu SC, Chen WT, Muo CH, Ke TW, Fang CW, Sung FC (2015) Association between appendectomy and subsequent colorectal cancer development: an Asian population study. PLoS One 10:e0118411

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital and Medical School, 322 Seoyang-ro Hwasun-eup, Hwasun-gun, Jeonnam, 58128, Korea

    Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Young Jin Kim & Hyeong Rok Kim

Authors
  1. Soo Young Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chang Hyun Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Young Jin Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hyeong Rok Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyeong Rok Kim.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Young Jin Kim, and Hyeong Rok Kim have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, S.Y., Kim, C.H., Kim, Y.J. et al. Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer patients who underwent previous abdominal surgery. Surg Endosc 30, 5472–5480 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4908-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4908-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation