Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A population-based analysis of emergent versus elective paraesophageal hernia repair using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

As the life expectancy in the United States continues to increase, more elderly, sometimes frail patients present with sub-acute surgical conditions such as a symptomatic paraesophageal hernia (PEH). While the outcomes of PEH repair have improved largely due to the proliferation of laparoscopic surgery, there is still a defined rate of morbidity and mortality. We sought to characterize the outcomes of both elective and emergent PEH repair using a large population-based data set.

Methods

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried for primary ICD-9 codes associated with PEH repair (years 2006–2008). Outcomes were in-hospital mortality and the occurrence of a pre-identified complication. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the risk factors for complications and mortality following both elective and emergent PEH repair.

Results

A total of 8,462 records in the data, representing 41,723 patients in the US undergoing PEH repair in the study interval, were identified. Of these procedures, 74.2 % was elective and 42.4 % was laparoscopic. The overall complication and mortality rates were 20.8 and 1.1 %, respectively. Emergent repair was associated with a higher rate of morbidity (33.4 vs. 16.5 %, p < 0.001) and mortality (3.2 vs. 0.37 %, p < 0.001) than elective repair. Emergent repair patients were more likely to be male, were older, and more likely to be minority. Logistic modeling revealed that younger age, elective case status, and a laparoscopic approach were independently associated with a lower probability of complications and mortality.

Conclusions

Patients undergoing emergent PEH repair in the United States tend to be older, more likely a racial minority, and less likely to undergo laparoscopic repair. Elective repair, younger age, and a laparoscopic approach are associated with improved outcomes. Considering all of the above, we recommend that patients consider elective repair with a surgeon experienced in the laparoscopic approach, especially when symptoms related to the hernia are present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gangopadhyay N, Perrone JM, Soper NJ et al (2006) Outcomes of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair in elderly and high-risk patients. Surgery 140(4):491–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Skinner DB, Belsey RH (1967) Surgical management of esophageal reflux and hiatus hernia. Long-term results with 1,030 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 53:33–54

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hill LD (1973) Incarcerated paraesophageal hernia. A surgical emergency. Am J Surg 126:286–291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stylopoulos N, Gazelle GS, Rattner DW (2002) Paraesophageal Hernias: operation or observation? Ann Surg 236(4):492–501

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. HCUP NIS Database Documentation. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/nisdbdocumentation.jsp. Accessed Dec 2013

  6. Gupta A, Chang D, Steele KE, Schweitzer MA, Lyn-Sue J, Lidor A (2008) Looking beyond age and co-morbidities as predictors of outcomes in paraesophageal hernia repair. J Gastrointest Surg 12:2119–2124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Polomsky M, Hu R, Sepesi B et al (2010) A population-based analysis of emergent vs. elective hospital admissions for an intrathoracic stomach. Surg Endosc 24:1250–1255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Poulose BK, Gosen C, Marks JM et al (2008) Inpatient mortality analysis of paraesophageal hernia repair in octogenarians. J Gastrointest Surg 12:1888–1892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fullum TM, Oyetunji TA, Ortega G et al (2013) Open versus laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair. JSLS 17(1):23–29

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bhayani NH, Kurian AA, Sharata AM, Reavis KM, Dunst CM, Swanstrom LL (2013) Wait only to resuscitate: early surgery for acutely presenting paraesophageal hernias yields better outcomes. Surg Endosc 27(1):267–271

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nguyen NT, Christie C, Masoomi H, Matin T, Laugenour K, Hohmann S (2011) Utilization and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open paraesophageal hernia repair. Am Surg 77:1353–1357

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sihvo EI, Salo JA, Rasanen JV, Rantanen TK (2009) Fatal complications of adult paraesophageal hernia: a population-based study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137:419–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Postlethwait RW (1986) Surgery of the esophagus. Appleton & Lange, Stamford, CT

    Google Scholar 

  14. Henry A, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz S, Nguyen LL (2013) Comparative methods for handling missing data in large databases. J Vasc Surg 58(5):1353–1359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nguyen GC, Patel AM (2013) Racial disparities in mortality in patients undergoing bariatric surgery in the USA. Obes Surg 23(10):1508–1514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Durazzo TS, Frencher S, Gusberg R (2013) Influence of race on the management of lower extremity ischemia: revascularization vs amputation. JAMA Surg 148(7):617–623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Quan H, Li B, Saunders LD et al (2008) Assessing validity of ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data in recording clinical conditions in a unique dually coded database. Health Serv Res 43:1424–1441

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Medical College of Wisconsin Division of Biostatistics, who was supported, in part, by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through Grant Number 8UL1TR00055.

Disclosures

Drs. Jassim, Wallace, Kastenmeier, Seligman, and Frelich have no conflict of interest. Dr. Gould is a consultant for Torax Medical. Dr. Goldblatt receives funding support for research from WL Gore and Davol Inc. He is also a speaker for Covidien.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jon C. Gould.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jassim, H., Seligman, J.T., Frelich, M. et al. A population-based analysis of emergent versus elective paraesophageal hernia repair using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Surg Endosc 28, 3473–3478 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3626-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3626-3

Keywords

Navigation