Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Emergent Surgery Does Not Independently Predict 30-Day Mortality After Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: Results from the ACS NSQIP Database

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Aim

Patients undergoing emergency surgery for paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair have a higher adjusted mortality risk based on Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). We sought to examine this relationship in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP), which adjusts for patient-level risk factors, including factors contributing to patient frailty.

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of the NSQIP from 2009 through 2011. A modified frailty index was created based on previously validated methodology.

Results

Of 3498 patients with PEH repair, 175 (5 %) underwent emergent surgery. Older age, lower BMI, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), current dialysis, SIRS, and sepsis were significantly more common among emergent patients. These patients also had a poorer functional status, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), and higher frailty scores and more likely to undergo open surgery. Postoperative complications were proportionally more common, and LOS was longer (8.5 vs. 3.4 days) among emergent patients (all p < 0.05). In univariate analysis, emergent patients demonstrated ten times greater mortality than the elective surgery group (8 vs. 0.8 %). On adjusted analysis, emergent surgery was no longer independently associated with mortality. Frailty score 2 or above and preoperative sepsis significantly predicted increased mortality while laparoscopic repair and BMI 25–50 and BMI ≥30 (vs. BMI <18.5) were significantly protective in the entire group of patients.

Conclusion

Increased mortality among patients undergoing emergent PEH repair may be related to severity of disease and other preoperative comorbid illness. Without an emergent indication, some of these patients likely would have been excluded as candidates for elective surgical intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andujar JJ, Papasavas PK, Birdas T, Robke J, Raftopoulos Y, Gagne DJ, Caushaj PF, Landreneau RJ, Keenan RJ: Laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hernia is associated with a low incidence of recurrence and reoperation. Surgical endoscopy 2004, 18(3):444–447.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aly A, Munt J, Jamieson GG, Ludemann R, Devitt PG, Watson DI: Laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernias. The British journal of surgery 2005, 92(5):648–653.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mungo B, Molena D, Stem M, Feinberg RL, Lidor AO: Thirty-day outcomes of paraesophageal hernia repair using the NSQIP database: should laparoscopy be the standard of care? Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2014, 219(2):229–236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stylopoulos N, Gazelle GS, Rattner DW: Paraesophageal hernias: operation or observation? Annals of surgery 2002, 236(4):492–500; discussion 500–491.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hill LD: Incarcerated paraesophageal hernia. A surgical emergency. American journal of surgery 1973, 126(2):286–291.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Beardsley JM, Thompson WR: Acutely Obstructed Hiatal Hernia. Annals of surgery 1964, 159:49–62.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Poulose BK, Gosen C, Marks JM, Khaitan L, Rosen MJ, Onders RP, Trunzo JA, Ponsky JL: Inpatient mortality analysis of paraesophageal hernia repair in octogenarians. Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2008, 12(11):1888–1892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Polomsky M, Jones CE, Sepesi B, O'Connor M, Matousek A, Hu R, Raymond DP, Litle VR, Watson TJ, Peters JH: Should elective repair of intrathoracic stomach be encouraged? Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2010, 14(2):203–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Luketich JD, Nason KS, Christie NA, Pennathur A, Jobe BA, Landreneau RJ, Schuchert MJ: Outcomes after a decade of laparoscopic giant paraesophageal hernia repair. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2010, 139(2):395–404, 404 e391.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jassim H, Seligman JT, Frelich M, Goldblatt M, Kastenmeier A, Wallace J, Zhao HS, Szabo A, Gould JC: A population-based analysis of emergent versus elective paraesophageal hernia repair using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Surgical endoscopy 2014.

  11. American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program [http://site.acsnsqip.org]

  12. Karam J, Tsiouris A, Shepard A, Velanovich V, Rubinfeld I: Simplified frailty index to predict adverse outcomes and mortality in vascular surgery patients. Annals of vascular surgery 2013, 27(7):904–908.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Uppal S, Igwe E, Rice LW, Spencer RJ, Rose SL: Frailty index predicts severe complications in gynecologic oncology patients. Gynecologic oncology 2015, 137(1):98–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Flegal KM, Graubard BI, Williamson DF, Gail MH: Cause-specific excess deaths associated with underweight, overweight, and obesity. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2007, 298(17):2028–2037.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Haut ER, Pronovost PJ, Schneider EB: Limitations of administrative databases. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2012, 307(24):2589; author reply 2589–2590.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lapar DJ, Stukenborg GJ, Lau CL, Jones DR, Kozower BD: Differences in reported esophageal cancer resection outcomes between national clinical and administrative databases. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2012, 144(5):1152–1157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. HCUP NIS Database Documentation. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. [http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nisoverview.jsp]

  18. Anderson JE, Rose J, Noorbakhsh A, Talamini MA, Finlayson SR, Bickler SW, Chang DC: An efficient risk adjustment model to predict inpatient adverse events after surgery. World journal of surgery 2014, 38(8):1954–1960.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wiechmann RJ, Ferguson MK, Naunheim KS, McKesey P, Hazelrigg SJ, Santucci TS, Macherey RS, Landreneau RJ: Laparoscopic management of giant paraesophageal herniation. The Annals of thoracic surgery 2001, 71(4):1080–1086; discussion 1086–1087.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hawasli A, Zonca S: Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernia. The American surgeon 1998, 64(8):703–710.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gantert WA, Patti MG, Arcerito M, Feo C, Stewart L, DePinto M, Bhoyrul S, Rangel S, Tyrrell D, Fujino Y et al.: Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernias. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 1998, 186(4):428–432; discussion 432–423.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Horgan S, Eubanks TR, Jacobsen G, Omelanczuk P, Pellegrini CA: Repair of paraesophageal hernias. American journal of surgery 1999, 177(5):354–358.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dahlberg PS, Deschamps C, Miller DL, Allen MS, Nichols FC, Pairolero PC: Laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hiatal hernia. The Annals of thoracic surgery 2001, 72(4):1125–1129.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu JS, Dunnegan DL, Soper NJ: Clinical and radiologic assessment of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. Surgical endoscopy 1999, 13(5):497–502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toms Augustin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Augustin, T., Schneider, E., Alaedeen, D. et al. Emergent Surgery Does Not Independently Predict 30-Day Mortality After Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: Results from the ACS NSQIP Database. J Gastrointest Surg 19, 2097–2104 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-015-2968-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-015-2968-z

Keywords

Navigation