Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Augmented reality telementoring (ART) platform: a randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of a new surgical education technology

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic skills training has evolved over recent years. However, conveying a mentor’s directions using conventional methods, without realistic on-screen visual cues, can be difficult and confusing. To facilitate laparoscopic skill transference, an augmented reality telementoring (ART) platform was designed to overlay the instruments of a mentor onto the trainee’s laparoscopic monitor. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of this new teaching modality to traditional methods in novices performing an intracorporeal suturing task.

Methods

Nineteen pre-medical and medical students were randomized into traditional mentoring (n = 9) and ART (n = 10) groups for a laparoscopic suturing and knot-tying task. Subjects received either traditional mentoring or ART for 1 h on the validated fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery intracorporeal suturing task. Tasks for suturing were recorded and scored for time and errors. Results were analyzed using means, standard deviation, power regression analysis, correlation coefficient, analysis of variance, and student’s t test.

Results

Using Wright’s cumulative average model (Y = aX b) the learning curve slope was significantly steeper, demonstrating faster skill acquisition, for the ART group (b = −0.567, r 2 = 0.92) than the control group (b = −0.453, r 2 = 0.74). At the end of 10 repetitions or 1 h of practice, the ART group was faster versus traditional (mean 167.4 vs. 242.4 s, p = 0.014). The ART group also had fewer fails (8) than the traditional group (13).

Conclusion

The ART Platform may be a more effective training technique in teaching laparoscopic skills to novices compared to traditional methods. ART conferred a shorter learning curve, which was more pronounced in the first 4 trials. ART reduced the number of failed attempts and resulted in faster suture times by the end of the training session. ART may be a more effective training tool in laparoscopic surgical training for complex tasks than traditional methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Issenberg SB, Scalese RJ (2008) Simulation in health care education. Perspect Biol Med 51:31–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wanzel KR, Ward M, Reznick RK (2002) Teaching the surgical craft: from selection to certification. Curr Probl Surg 39:573–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Botden SMBI, Jakimowicz JJ (2009) What is going on in augmented reality simulation in laparoscopic surgery? Surg Endosc 23:1693–1700

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Botden SMBI, Buzink SN, Schijven MP, Jakimowicz JJ (2008) ProMIS augmented reality training of laparoscopic procedures face validity. Simul Healthc 3:97–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Panait L, Hogle NJ, Fowler DL, Bell RL, Roberts KE, Duffy AJ (2011) Completion of a novel, virtual-reality-based, advanced laparoscopic curriculum improves advanced laparoscopic skills in senior residents. J Surg Educ 68:121–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Panait L, Rafiq A, Tomulescu V, Boanca C, Popescu I, Carbonell A, Merrell RC (2006) Telementoring versus on-site mentoring in virtual reality-based surgical training. Surg Endosc 20:113–118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Larsen CR, Soerensen JL, Grantcharov TP, Dalsgaard T, Schouenborg L, Ottosen C, Schroeder TV, Ottesen BS (2009) Effect of virtual reality training on laparoscopic surgery: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 338:b1802

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Larsen CR, Oestergaard J, Ottesen BS, Soerensen JL (2012) The efficacy of virtual reality simulation training in laparoscopy: a systematic review of randomized trials. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 91:1015–1028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Palter VN, Grantcharov TP (2012) Development and validation of a comprehensive curriculum to teach an advanced minimally invasive procedure: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 256:25–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Aggarwal R, Ward J, Balasundaram I, Sains P, Athanasiou T, Darzi A (2007) Proving the effectiveness of virtual reality simulation for training in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 246:771–779

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA, Cadeddu M, Gregoire R, Poulin EC (2001) Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections. Dis Colon Rectum 44:217–222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Okrainec A, Ferri LE, Feldman LS, Fried GM (2011) Defining the learning curve in laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a CUSUM analysis. Surg Endosc 25:1083–1087

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Costantino F, Mutter D, D’Agostino J, Dente M, Leroy J, Wu HS, Marescaux J (2012) Mentored trainees obtain comparable operative results to experts in complex laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:65–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sebajang H, Trudeau P, Dougall A, Hegge S, McKinley C, Anvari M (2005) Telementoring: an important enabling tool for the community surgeon. Surg Innov 12:327–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sebajang H, Trudeau P, Dougall A, Hegge S, McKinley C, Anvari M (2006) The role of telementoring and telerobotic assistance in the provision of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in rural areas. Surg Endosc 20:1389–1393

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schlachta CM, Lefebvre KL, Sorsdahl AK, Jayaraman S (2010) Mentoring and telementoring leads to effective incorporation of laparoscopic colon surgery. Surg Endosc 24:841–844

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, Franzen J, Bollmann S, Koch OO, Pointner R, Granderath FA (2012) A comprehensive review of telementoring applications in laparoscopic general surgery. Surg Endosc 26:2111–2116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Botden SMBI, Berlage JTM, Schijven MP, Jakimowicz JJ (2008) Face validity study of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic suturing simulator. Surg Technol Int 17:26–32

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Botden SMBI, Hingh IHJT, Jakimowicz JJ (2008) Suturing training in augmented reality: gaining proficiency in suturing skills faster. Surg Endosc 23:2131–2137

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. LeBlanc F, Champagne BJ, Augestad KM, Neary PC, Senagore AJ, Ellis CN, Delaney CP (2010) A comparison of human cadaver and augmented reality simulator models for straight laparoscopic colorectal skills acquisition training. J Am Coll Surg 211:250–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nakamoto M, Ukimura O, Faber K, Gill IS (2012) Current progress on augmented reality visualization in endoscopic surgery. Curr Opin Urol 22:121–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nicolau S, Soler L, Mutter D, Marescaux J (2011) Augmented reality in laparoscopic surgical oncology. Surg Oncol 20:189–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WCJ, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Salimath J, Jones M, Hunt D, Lane M (2007) Comparison of return of bowel function and length of stay in patients undergoing laparoscopic versus open colectomy. JSLS 11:72–75

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Internal Research Grant from the Department of Surgery, University of Nevada School of Medicine

Disclosures

Drs. Russo and Tsuda, and Angelina Vera and Adnan Mohsin have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angelina M. Vera.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vera, A.M., Russo, M., Mohsin, A. et al. Augmented reality telementoring (ART) platform: a randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of a new surgical education technology. Surg Endosc 28, 3467–3472 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3625-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3625-4

Keywords

Navigation