Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Telementoring versus on-site mentoring in virtual reality-based surgical training

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Telementoring can be an adjunct to surgical training using virtual reality surgical simulation. Telementoring is hypothesized to be as effective as a local mentor for surgical skills training.

Methods

In this study, 20 Romanian medical students trained using a virtual reality surgical simulator (LapSim) with a telementor or local mentor. All the students watched an instructional module at the beginning of the exercise. The telementor, in the United States, interacted by videoconferencing. Before and after training sessions, tool path length and time for task completion were measured.

Results

Instructional media and training with mentoring resulted in similar levels of performance between locally mentored and telementored groups. Right- and left-hand path length and time decreased significantly within each group from the initial to the final evaluation (p < 0.05) for most tasks (grasping, cutting, suturing). No significant difference was achieved for clip-applying.

Conclusions

Integration of instructional media with telementoring can be as effective for the development of surgical skills as local mentoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gallagher AG, Richie K, McClure N, McGuigan J (2001) Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced, junior, and novice laparoscopists with virtual reality. World J Surg 25: 1478–1483

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gallagher AG, Satava RM (2002) Virtual reality as a metric for the assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills: learning curves and reliability measures. Surg Endosc 16: 1746–1752

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Haluck RS, Marshall RL, Krummel TM, Melkonian MG (2001) Are surgery training programs ready for virtual reality? A survey of program directors in general surgery. J Am Coll Surg 193: 660–665

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hamilton EC, Scott DJ, Fleming JB, Rege RV, Laycock R, Bergen PC, Tesfay ST, Jones DB (2002) Comparison of video trainer and virtual reality training systems on acquisition of laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc 16: 406–411

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hyltander A, Liljegren E, Rhodin PH, Lonroth H (2002) The transfer of basic skills learned in a laparoscopic simulator to the operating room. Surg Endosc 16: 1324–1328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Institute for Higher Education Policy (2000) Quality on the line: benchmarks for success in Internet-based distance education. The Institute for Higher Education Policy, Washington, DC. Retrieved February 11, 2005 at http://www.ihep.com/Pubs/PDF/Quality.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kothari SN, Kaplan BJ, DeMaria EJ, Broderick TJ, Merrell RC (2002) Training in laparoscopic suturing skills using a new computer-based virtual reality simulator (MIST-VR) provides results comparable to those with an established pelvic trainer system. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 12: 167–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pearson AM, Gallagher AG, Rosser JC, Satava RM (2002) Evaluation of structured and quantitative training methods for teaching intracorporeal knot tying. Surg Endosc 16: 130–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. ProMIS Surgical Simulator (Haptica Inc., Boston, MA) Retrieved December 9, 2004 at http://www.haptica.com/id11.htm

  10. Rosser JC, Rosser LE, Savalgi RS (1997) Skill acquisition and assessment for laparoscopic surgery. Arch Surg 132: 200–204

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosser JC Jr, Rosser LE, Savalgi RS (1998) Objective evaluation of a laparoscopic surgical skill program for residents and senior surgeons. Arch Surg 133: 657–666

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O’Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, Satava RM (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236: 458–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Simbionix, computerized medical training simulators and clinical devices for MIS. Retrieved December 9, 2004 at http://www. simbionix.com/

  14. Surgical Science. Laparoscopic simulation. Retrieved December 9, 2004 at www.surgical-science.com

  15. Tendick F, Downes M, Goktekin T, Cavusoglu MC, Feygin D, Xu X, Eyal R, Hegarty M, Way LW (2002) A virtual environment testbed for training laparoscopic surgical skills. Presence 9: 236–255

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, 1101 East Marshall Street, Post Office Box 980480, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA

    L. Panait, A. Rafiq, A. Carbonell & R. C. Merrell

  2. Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania

    V. Tomulescu, C. Boanca & I. Popescu

Authors
  1. L. Panait
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Rafiq
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. V. Tomulescu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C. Boanca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. I. Popescu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. A. Carbonell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. R. C. Merrell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. C. Merrell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Panait, L., Rafiq, A., Tomulescu, V. et al. Telementoring versus on-site mentoring in virtual reality-based surgical training. Surg Endosc 20, 113–118 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0113-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0113-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation