Abstract
Background
Hand-assisted laparoscopic (HAL) colorectal resection remains controversial. Critics believe HAL methods lead to decreased use of laparoscopically assisted (LA) methods. Proponents believe selective HAL use increases minimally invasive surgery (MIS) use rates. This study assessed general and body mass index (BMI)-specific HAL and LA colorectal resection use by surgeons who embraced both methods.
Methods
This study retrospectively investigated 1,122 patients who underwent colorectal resection during an 8-year period. Surgical method, type of colorectal resection, BMI, comorbidities, incision length, and short-term outcomes were collected.
Results
The surgical methods included LA (60 %), HAL (25 %), and open (OP 15 %) procedures. The HAL group mean BMI was higher than that of the LA group (P < 0.0001), and the HAL use rate varied directly with BMI. The HAL technique was used for 48 % of the rectal, 36 % of the sigmoid, and 4 % of the right colorectal resections. The incision length was directly proportional to BMI for all the methods. Although the HAL incision lengths were significantly longer than the LA incision lengths for a BMI lower than 40 kg/m2, there was no difference when the BMI was 40 kg/m2 or higher. The comorbidities were greater in the HAL group than in the LA sigmoid colorectal resection group (P = 0.001). The mean hospital length of stay (LOS) was similar for the HAL and LA patients but longer for the open surgery patients (P < 0.0001 vs HAL group). The major complications, reoperations, and 30-day mortality rates were low and comparable.
Conclusions
The HAL methods were used primarily for sigmoid and rectal colorectal resections and for higher BMI patients with more comorbidities. The mean incision length difference between the HAL and LA methods was 3.9 cm, but neither the LOS nor the major postoperative complications differed significantly. Selective use of HAL together with LA methods led to a MIS use rate of 85 % and facilitated MIS for high BMI patients. Together, the methods are complementary and may increase the number of minimally invasive surgeries performed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Targarona EM, Gracia E, Garriga J, Martinez-Bu C, Cortes M, Boluda R, Lerma L, Trias M (2002) Prospective randomized trial comparing conventional laparoscopic colectomy with hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: applicability, immediate clinical outcome, inflammatory response, and cost. Surg Endosc 16:234–239
Marcello PW, Fleshman J, Milsom J, Read T, Arnell T, Birnbaum E, Feingold DL, Lee SW, Mutch MG, Sonoda T, Yan Y, Whelan RL (2008) Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 51:818–828
Maartense S, Dunker MS, Slors JF, Cuesta MA, Gouma DJ, van Deventer SJ, van Bodegraven, Bemelman WA (2004) Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy vs open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 240:984–991
Kang JC, Chung MH, Chao PC, Yeh CC, Hsiao CW, Lee TY, Jao SW (2004) Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy vs open colectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 18:577–581
Stein S, Whelan R (2007) The controversy regarding hand-assisted colorectal resection. Surg Endosc 21:2123–2126
Lascano CA, Kaidar-Person O, Szomstein S, Rosenthal R, Wexner S (2006) Challenges of laparoscopic colectomy in the obese patient: a review. Am J Surg 192:357–365
WHO (1995) Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthrompometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. WHO Technical Report Series 854. World health Organization, Geneva, 1995
Charlson M, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383
Acknowledgments
The principal investigator, Richard L. Whelan, is a speaker for Olympus Corporation and receives support for investigator-initiated studies. He also is a speaker for Ethicon Endosurgery.
Disclosures
Elizabeth A. Myers, Daniel L. Feingold, Tracey D. Arnell, Linda Njoh, Vesna Cekic, Joon Ho Jang, and Samer Naffouje have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Myers, E.A., Feingold, D.L., Arnell, T.D. et al. The rate for the use of hand-assisted laparoscopic methods is directly proportional to body mass index. Surg Endosc 28, 108–115 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3135-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3135-9