Abstract
Background
Trocar-associated visceral injuries are rare but potentially fatal complications of laparoscopic access. More commonly, abdominal wall bleeding occurs, which usually requires hemostatic measures and prolongs operative time. Blunt-tipped trocars have been postulated to carry a lower risk of abdominal wall bleeding and intra-abdominal injuries. The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to comparatively evaluate the relative risks of abdominal wall bleeding, visceral injuries, and overall complications with the use of bladed and blunt-tipped laparoscopic trocars.
Methods
The databases of Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Randomized Trials were searched to identify randomized studies that compared trocar-associated complications with the use of blunt and bladed trocars. Primary outcome measure was the relative risk of abdominal wall trocar site bleeding, and secondary outcome measures included visceral injuries and overall complications. Outcome data were pooled and combined overall effect sizes were calculated using the fixed- or random-effects model.
Results
Eight eligible randomized trials were identified; they included 720 patients with a median Jadad score of 4. The incidence of abdominal wall bleeding for the blunt and the bladed trocar group was 3 and 9 %, respectively [odds ratio (OR) 0.42, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.21–0.88]. Trocar-associated morbidity rate, excluding bleeding events of the abdominal wall, was documented at 0.2 and 0.7 % of the blunt and the bladed trocar arm, respectively (OR 0.43, 95 % CI 0.06–2.97). The overall trocar-associated morbidity rate was 3 % in the blunt trocar group and 10 % in the bladed trocar group (OR 0.38, 95 % CI 0.19–0.77).
Conclusions
Reliable data support a lower relative risk of trocar site bleeding and overall complications with blunt laparoscopic cannulas than bladed trocars. Transition to blunt trocars for secondary cannulation of the abdominal wall is thus strongly recommended. Larger patient populations are required to estimate the relative risk of visceral injuries.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Vilos GA, Ternamian A, Dempster J, Laberge PY, The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (2007) Laparoscopic entry: a review of techniques, technologies, and complications. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 29:433–465
Fuller J, Ashar BS, Carey-Corrado J (2005) Trocar-associated injuries and fatalities: an analysis of 1399 reports to the FDA. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12:302–307
Opitz I, Gantert W, Giger U, Kocher T, Krähenbühl L (2005) Bleeding remains a major complication during laparoscopic surgery: analysis of the SALTS database. Langenbecks Arch Surg 390:128–133
Leibl BJ, Schmedt CG, Schwarz J, Kraft K, Bittner R (1999) Laparoscopic surgery complications associated with trocar tip design: review of literature and own results. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 9:135–140
Sileshi B, Achneck H, Ma L, Lawson JH (2010) Application of energy-based technologies and topical hemostatic agents in the management of surgical hemostasis. Vascular 18:197–204
Bhoyrul S, Vierra MA, Nezhat CR, Krummel TM, Way LW (2001) Trocar injuries in laparoscopic surgery. J Am Coll Surg 192:677–683
Tarnay CM, Glass KB, Munro MG (1999) Entry force and intra-abdominal pressure associated with six laparoscopic trocar-cannula systems: a randomized comparison. Obstet Gynecol 94:83–88
Bhoyrul S, Mori T, Way LW (1996) Radially expanding dilatation. A superior method of laparoscopic trocar access. Surg Endosc 10:775–778
Turner DJ (1996) A new, radially expanding access system for laparoscopic procedures versus conventional cannulas. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 3:609–615
Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17:1–12
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700
Venkatesh R, Sundaram CP, Figenshau RS, Yan Y, Andriole GL, Clayman RV, Landman J (2007) Prospective randomized comparison of cutting and dilating disposable trocars for access during laparoscopic renal surgery. JSLS 11:198–203
Bisgaard T, Jakobsen HL, Jacobsen B, Olsen SD, Rosenberg J (2007) Randomized clinical trial comparing radially expanding trocars with conventional cutting trocars for the effects on pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 21:2012–2016
Hamade AM, Issa ME, Haylett KR, Ammori BJ (2007) Fixity of ports to the abdominal wall during laparoscopic surgery: a randomized comparison of cutting versus blunt trocars. Surg Endosc 21:965–969
Stepanian AA, Winer WK, Isler CM, Lyons TL (2007) Comparative analysis of 5 mm trocars: dilating tip versus non-shielded bladed. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14:176–183
Yim SF, Yuen PM (2001) Randomized double-masked comparison of radially expanding access device and conventional cutting tip trocar in laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol 97:435–438
Bhoyrul S, Payne J, Steffes B, Swanstrom L, Way LW (2000) A randomized prospective study of radially expanding trocars in laparoscopic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 4:392–397
Lam TY, Lee SW, So HS, Kwok SP (2000) Radially expanding trocar: a less painful alternative for laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 10:269–273
Mettler L, Maher P (2000) Investigation of the effectiveness of the radially-expanding needle system, in contrast to the cutting trocar in enhancing patient recovery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 9:397–401
Feste JR, Bojahr B, Turner DJ (2000) Randomized trial comparing a radially expandable needle system with cutting trocars. JSLS 4:11–15
Krishnakumar S, Tambe P (2009) Entry complications in laparoscopic surgery. J Gynecol Endosc Surg 1:4–11
Orvieto M, Breyer B, Sokoloff M, Shalhav AH (2004) Aortic injury during initial blunt trocar laparoscopic access for renal surgery. J Urol 171:349–350
Voitk A, Rizoli S (2001) Blunt hasson trocar injury: long intra-abdominal trocar and lean patient–a dangerous combination. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 11:259–262
Munro MG, Tarnay CM (2004) The impact of trocar-cannula design and simulated operative manipulation on incisional characteristics: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 103:681–685
Kouba EJ, Hubbard JS, Wallen E, Pruthi RS (2007) Incisional hernia in a 12 mm non-bladed trocar site following laparoscopic nephrectomy. Urol Int 79:276–279
Mordecai SC, Warren OW, Warren SJ (2012) Radially expanding laparoscopic trocar ports significantly reduce postoperative pain in all age groups. Surg Endosc 26:843–846
Disclosures
Drs. Stavros A. Antoniou, George A. Antoniou, Oliver O. Koch, Rudolph Pointner, and Frank A. Granderath have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Antoniou, S.A., Antoniou, G.A., Koch, O.O. et al. Blunt versus bladed trocars in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Surg Endosc 27, 2312–2320 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2793-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2793-y