Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How reliable is laparoscopic colorectal surgery compared with laparotomy for octogenarians?

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Due to the current increased longevity in the elderly population and the increased size of that population, major abdominal intervention is more frequently performed among octogenarians. This study aimed to compare the surgical and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal resections with those of open surgery in the octogenarian population.

Methods

Retrospective analysis based on a prospectively maintained database of octogenarians who underwent laparoscopic or open elective colorectal resections from 2001 to 2008 was performed. Diagnosis, comorbidities, operative data, and early postoperative complications are analyzed in this report.

Results

Colon resection was performed for 199 octogenarians, using laparotomy for 116 patients (group 1) and laparoscopic surgery for 83 patients (group 2). The mean age was 84.3 years for the laparotomy patients and 84.7 years for the laparoscopic patients. The American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) scores was comparable between groups 1 and 2. Colorectal adenoma was the most common indication for surgery in both groups: for 77.6% of the group 1 patients and 54.2% of the group 2 patients. Right colectomy was the most frequently performed operation in group 2: for 57.8% of the group 2 patients and 31% of the group 1 patients (p = 0.0003). Open resections had a higher mean blood loss in both group 1 (286 ml) and group 2 (152 ml) (p = 0.0002), and more patients required intraoperative transfusions (p = 0.005) despite similar operative times. The conversion rate in the laparoscopic group was 25.3%. The patients in the laparoscopic group had less morbidity, both overall and clinically, than the open group (p < 0.05). The median hospital stay was 8 days in group 1 and 6 days in group 2 (p = 0.0065). The rate of major surgical complications was similar in the two groups of patients: 6% in group 1 and 4.8% in group 2. The reoperation rate was 2.6% in group 1 and 3.6% in group 2 (p > 0.05). The mortality rate was 3.4% in group 1 and 2.4% in group 2.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic colorectal resection was effective and safe for octogenarians, with less blood loss and faster postoperative recovery. The morbidity rate is lower than for traditional laparotomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Annual report 2003. Department of Health, Hong Kong, SAR. Retrieved 30 January 2009 at http://www.census.gov/population/www/projections/usinterimproj/

  2. Sylla P, Kirman I, Whelan RL (2005) Immunological advantages of advanced laparoscopy. Surg Clin North Am 85:1–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2004) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91:1111–1124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Ng SS, Lai PB, Lau WY (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomized trial. Lancet 363:1187–1192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stocchi L, Nelson H, Young-Fadok TM, Larson DR, Ilstrup DM (2000) Safety and advantages of laparoscopic vs open colectomy in the elderly: matched-control study. Dis Colon Rectum 43:326–332

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Law WL, Chu KW, Tung PH (2002) Laparoscopic colorectal resection: a safe option for elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg 195:768–773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vignali A, Di Palo S, Tamburini A, Radaelli G, Orsenigo E, Staudacher C (2005) Laparoscopic vs open colectomies in octogenarians: a case-matched control study. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2070–2075

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sklow B, Read T, Birnbaum E, Fry R, Fleshman J (2003) Age and type of procedure influence the choice of patients for laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 17:923–929

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stewart BT, Stitz RW, Lumley JW (1999) Laparoscopically assisted colorectal surgery in the elderly. Br J Surg 86:938–941

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Feng B, Zheng MH, Mao ZH, Li JW, Lu AG, Wang ML, Hu WG, Dong F, Hu YY, Zang L, Li HW (2006) Clinical advantages of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in the elderly. Aging Clin Exp Res 18:191–195

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Senagore AJ, Madbouly KM, Fazio VW, Duepree HJ, Brady KM, Delaney CP (2003) Advantages of laparoscopic colectomy in older patients. Arch Surg 138:252–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Frasson M, Braga M, Vignalli A, Zuliani W, Di Carlo V (2008) Benefits of laparoscopic colorectal resection are more pronounced in elderly patients. Dis Colon Rectum 51:296–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fielding LP, Philips RK, Hittinger R (1989) Factors influencing mortality after curative resection for large bowel cancer in elderly patients. Lancet 1:595–597

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Payne JE, Chapuis PH, Pheils MT (1986) Surgery for large bowel cancer in people aged 75 years and older. Dis Colon Rectum 29:733–737

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cheung HYS, Cung CC, Fung JTK, Wong JCH, Yau KKK, Li MKW (2007) Laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer in octogenarians: results in a decade. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1905–1910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Scheidbach H, Schneider C, Hugel O, Yildirim C, Lippert H, Köckerling F (2005) Laparoscopic surgery in old patients: do indications and outcomes differ? Langenbecks Arch Surg 390:328–332

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Person B, Cera SM, Sands DR, Weiss EG, Vernava AM, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD (2007) Do elderly patients benefit from laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Surg Endosc 22:401–405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. De Santis L, Frigo F (2006) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the elderly. Acta Bio-Medica de I Ateneo Parmense 76:24–26

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shawki S, Bashankaev B, Denoya P, Seo C, Weiss EG, Wexner SD (2009) What is the definition of “conversion” in laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Surg Endosc 23:2321–2326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Steven D. Wexner is a consultant in the field of laparoscopy for Covidien and for Karl Storz Endoscopy. He is also entitled to recieve inventors income from Karl Storz Endoscopy. Rodrigo A. Pinto, Dan Ruiz, Yair Edden, Eric G. Weiss, and Juan J. Nogueras have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven D. Wexner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pinto, R.A., Ruiz, D., Edden, Y. et al. How reliable is laparoscopic colorectal surgery compared with laparotomy for octogenarians?. Surg Endosc 25, 2692–2698 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1631-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1631-3

Keywords

Navigation