Abstract
Background
Due to the current increased longevity in the elderly population and the increased size of that population, major abdominal intervention is more frequently performed among octogenarians. This study aimed to compare the surgical and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal resections with those of open surgery in the octogenarian population.
Methods
Retrospective analysis based on a prospectively maintained database of octogenarians who underwent laparoscopic or open elective colorectal resections from 2001 to 2008 was performed. Diagnosis, comorbidities, operative data, and early postoperative complications are analyzed in this report.
Results
Colon resection was performed for 199 octogenarians, using laparotomy for 116 patients (group 1) and laparoscopic surgery for 83 patients (group 2). The mean age was 84.3 years for the laparotomy patients and 84.7 years for the laparoscopic patients. The American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) scores was comparable between groups 1 and 2. Colorectal adenoma was the most common indication for surgery in both groups: for 77.6% of the group 1 patients and 54.2% of the group 2 patients. Right colectomy was the most frequently performed operation in group 2: for 57.8% of the group 2 patients and 31% of the group 1 patients (p = 0.0003). Open resections had a higher mean blood loss in both group 1 (286 ml) and group 2 (152 ml) (p = 0.0002), and more patients required intraoperative transfusions (p = 0.005) despite similar operative times. The conversion rate in the laparoscopic group was 25.3%. The patients in the laparoscopic group had less morbidity, both overall and clinically, than the open group (p < 0.05). The median hospital stay was 8 days in group 1 and 6 days in group 2 (p = 0.0065). The rate of major surgical complications was similar in the two groups of patients: 6% in group 1 and 4.8% in group 2. The reoperation rate was 2.6% in group 1 and 3.6% in group 2 (p > 0.05). The mortality rate was 3.4% in group 1 and 2.4% in group 2.
Conclusions
Laparoscopic colorectal resection was effective and safe for octogenarians, with less blood loss and faster postoperative recovery. The morbidity rate is lower than for traditional laparotomy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Annual report 2003. Department of Health, Hong Kong, SAR. Retrieved 30 January 2009 at http://www.census.gov/population/www/projections/usinterimproj/
Sylla P, Kirman I, Whelan RL (2005) Immunological advantages of advanced laparoscopy. Surg Clin North Am 85:1–18
Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2004) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91:1111–1124
Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Ng SS, Lai PB, Lau WY (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomized trial. Lancet 363:1187–1192
Stocchi L, Nelson H, Young-Fadok TM, Larson DR, Ilstrup DM (2000) Safety and advantages of laparoscopic vs open colectomy in the elderly: matched-control study. Dis Colon Rectum 43:326–332
Law WL, Chu KW, Tung PH (2002) Laparoscopic colorectal resection: a safe option for elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg 195:768–773
Vignali A, Di Palo S, Tamburini A, Radaelli G, Orsenigo E, Staudacher C (2005) Laparoscopic vs open colectomies in octogenarians: a case-matched control study. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2070–2075
Sklow B, Read T, Birnbaum E, Fry R, Fleshman J (2003) Age and type of procedure influence the choice of patients for laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 17:923–929
Stewart BT, Stitz RW, Lumley JW (1999) Laparoscopically assisted colorectal surgery in the elderly. Br J Surg 86:938–941
Feng B, Zheng MH, Mao ZH, Li JW, Lu AG, Wang ML, Hu WG, Dong F, Hu YY, Zang L, Li HW (2006) Clinical advantages of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in the elderly. Aging Clin Exp Res 18:191–195
Senagore AJ, Madbouly KM, Fazio VW, Duepree HJ, Brady KM, Delaney CP (2003) Advantages of laparoscopic colectomy in older patients. Arch Surg 138:252–256
Frasson M, Braga M, Vignalli A, Zuliani W, Di Carlo V (2008) Benefits of laparoscopic colorectal resection are more pronounced in elderly patients. Dis Colon Rectum 51:296–300
Fielding LP, Philips RK, Hittinger R (1989) Factors influencing mortality after curative resection for large bowel cancer in elderly patients. Lancet 1:595–597
Payne JE, Chapuis PH, Pheils MT (1986) Surgery for large bowel cancer in people aged 75 years and older. Dis Colon Rectum 29:733–737
Cheung HYS, Cung CC, Fung JTK, Wong JCH, Yau KKK, Li MKW (2007) Laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer in octogenarians: results in a decade. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1905–1910
Scheidbach H, Schneider C, Hugel O, Yildirim C, Lippert H, Köckerling F (2005) Laparoscopic surgery in old patients: do indications and outcomes differ? Langenbecks Arch Surg 390:328–332
Person B, Cera SM, Sands DR, Weiss EG, Vernava AM, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD (2007) Do elderly patients benefit from laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Surg Endosc 22:401–405
De Santis L, Frigo F (2006) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the elderly. Acta Bio-Medica de I Ateneo Parmense 76:24–26
Shawki S, Bashankaev B, Denoya P, Seo C, Weiss EG, Wexner SD (2009) What is the definition of “conversion” in laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Surg Endosc 23:2321–2326
Disclosures
Steven D. Wexner is a consultant in the field of laparoscopy for Covidien and for Karl Storz Endoscopy. He is also entitled to recieve inventors income from Karl Storz Endoscopy. Rodrigo A. Pinto, Dan Ruiz, Yair Edden, Eric G. Weiss, and Juan J. Nogueras have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pinto, R.A., Ruiz, D., Edden, Y. et al. How reliable is laparoscopic colorectal surgery compared with laparotomy for octogenarians?. Surg Endosc 25, 2692–2698 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1631-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1631-3