Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: results of a prospective multicentre analysis of 4,970 patients

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To compare laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer and analyse the results of the multidisciplinary audited project on total mesorectal excision conducted in Spain.

Background

The safety and therapeutic efficiency of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer are controversial due to the technical difficulties it involves. A deviation from the oncological principles of mesorectal excision would mean a potential increase in local recurrence and shorter survival.

Methods

This prospective non-randomised multicentre study includes 4,970 patients with rectal cancer. The study compares perioperative, postoperative, anatomicopathological and survival variables.

Results

Five hundred and sixty five patients were excluded. Of the remaining 4,405, 3,018 (68.51 %) had open surgery (OS) and 1,387 (31.49 %) laparoscopic surgery (LS). The rate of anterior resections was higher in the LS group. The rate of intraoperative tumour perforation, number of red blood cell concentrates transfused and length of hospital stay were greater in the OS group, whereas surgical time was longer in the LS group. The incidence of complications was 45.6 % in the OS group and 38.3 % in the LS group. Involvement of the circumferential and distal margin, as well as unsatisfactory and partially satisfactory quality of the mesorectum, were greater in the OS group. There were no differences for local recurrence and survival rates.

Conclusions

According to these results, laparoscopic surgery is the best option for the surgical treatment of rectal cancer, with similar rates of local recurrence and survival, although there are oncological indicators in this study to suggest that these results can be improved with laparoscopic surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Brown JM, Medical Research Council Conventional versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery In Colorectal Cancer Trial Group (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061–3068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, Nam BH, Choi HS, Kim DW, Lim SB, Lee TG, Kim DY, Kim JS, Chang HJ, Lee HS, Kim SY, Jung KH, Hong YS, Kim JH, Sohn DK, Kim DH, Oh JH (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11:637–645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lujan J, Valero G, Hernandez Q, Sanchez A, Frutos MD, Parrilla P (2009) Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96:982–989

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Holm T, Johansson H, Cedermark B, Ekelund G, Rutqvist LE (1997) Influence of hospital and surgeon-related factors on outcome after treatment of rectal cancer with or without preoperative radiotherapy. Br J Surg 84:657–663

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rodríguez-Cuellar E, Ruiz López P, Romero Simó M, Landa García JI, Roig Vila JV, Ortiz Hurtado H (2010) Analysis of the quality of surgical treatment of colorectal cancer. A national study. Cir Esp 88:238–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ortiz H (2007) Total mesorectal excision: an audited training process by the Spanish Association of Surgeons. Cir Esp 82:193–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wibe A, Moller B, Norstein J, Carlsen E, Wiig JN, Heald RJ, Langmark F, Myrvold HE, Søreide O, Norwegian Rectal Cancer Group (2002) A national strategic change in treatment policy for rectal cancer-implementation of total mesorectal excision as routine treatment in Norway. A National audit. Dis Colon Rectum 45:857–866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Heald RJ (1995) Total mesorrectal excision is optimal surgery for rectal cancer. A Scandinavian consensus. Br J Surg 82:1297–1299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bianche PP, Rosati R, Bona S, Rottoli M, Elmore U, Ceriani C, Malesci A, Montorsi M (2007) Laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer: a prospective analysis of patient survival and outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 50:2047–2053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Badvie S, Hallan RI (2009) Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96(12):1494–1495 (author reply 1496)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shrikhande SV, Marda S, Goel M, Shetty G (2010) Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Lancet Oncol 11(10):919–920 (author reply 920–921)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Breukink S, Pierie J, Wiggers T (2006) Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18:4

    Google Scholar 

  15. Huang MJ, Liang JL, Wang H, Kang L, Deng YH, Wang JP (2011) Laparoscopic-assisted versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on oncologic adequacy of resection and long-term oncologic outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 26(4):415–421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou ZG, Hu M, Li Y, Lei WZ, Yu YY, Cheng Z, Li L, Shu Y, Wang TC (2004) Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 18:1211–1215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Miyajima N, Fukunaga M, Hasegawa H, Tanaka J, Okuda J, Watanabe M, Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery (2009) Results of a multicenter study of 1057 cases of rectal cancer treated by laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 23:113–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Milsom JW, Bohm B, Hammerhofer KA, Fazio V, Steiger E, Elson P (1998) A prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 187:46–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Scheidbach H, Rose J, Huegel O, Yildirim C, Köckerling F (2004) Results of laparoscopic treatment of rectal cancer: analysis of 520 patients. Tech Coloproctol 8:S22–S24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sröhlein MA, Grützner KU, Jauch KW, Heiss MM (2008) Comparison of laparoscopic vs open access surgery in patients with rectal cancer: a prospective analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 51:385–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Quirke P, Steele R, Monson J, Grieve R, Khanna S, Couture J, O’Callaghan C, Myint AS, Bessell E, Thompson LC, Parmar M, Stephens RJ, Sebag-Montefiore D, MRC CR07/NCIC-CTG CO16 Trial Investigators, NCRI Colorectal Cancer Study Group (2009) Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet 373:821–828

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wibe A, Rendedal PR, Svensson E, Norstein J, Eide TJ, Myrvold HE, Søreide O (2002) Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 89:327–334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Biondo S, Ortiz H, Lujan J, Codina-Cazador A, Espin E, Garcia-Granero E, Kreisler E, de Miguel M, Alos R, Echeverria A (2010) Quality of mesorectum alter laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Results of an audited teaching programme in Spain. Colorectal Dis 12(1):23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tang R, Chen HH, Wang YL, Changchien CR, Chen JS, Hsu KC, Chiang JM, Wang JY (2001) Risk factors for surgical site infection after elective resection of the colon and rectum: a single-center prospective study of 2,809 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 234:181–189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Amato A, Pescatori M (2006) Perioperative blood transfusions for the recurrence of colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD005033

  26. Mynster T, Nielsen HJ (2000) The impact of storage time of transfused blood on postoperative infectious complications in rectal cancer surgery. Danish RANX05 Colorectal Cancer Study Group. Scand J Gastroenterol 35:212–217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fleshman JW, Wexner SD, Anvari M, LaTulippe JF, Birnbaum EH, Kodner IJ, Read TE, Nogueras JJ, Weiss EG (1999) Laparoscopic vs open abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 42:930–939

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Guillou PJ, Quirke Ph, Thorpe H, Walker J, Quirke P, Guillou PJ (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASSICC trial): multicentre randomized controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, Capretti G, Di Carlo V (2007) Laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer patients: outcome and cost-benefit analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 50:464–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the participating hospitals and specialists of the Spanish Rectal Cancer Project 2006–2010.

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interests or financial ties to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital, 30120, Murcia, Spain

    J. Lujan & P. Parrilla

  2. Department of Surgery, Morales Meseguer University Hospital, Murcia, Spain

    G. Valero

  3. Department of Surgery, Bellvitge University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain

    S. Biondo

  4. Department of Surgery, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain

    E. Espin

  5. Department of Surgery, Virgen del Camino Hospital, Public University of Navarre, Pamplona, Spain

    H. Ortiz

Authors
  1. J. Lujan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. Valero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Biondo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. E. Espin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. P. Parrilla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. H. Ortiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Lujan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lujan, J., Valero, G., Biondo, S. et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: results of a prospective multicentre analysis of 4,970 patients. Surg Endosc 27, 295–302 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2444-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2444-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation