Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Endoscopic surgeons’ preferences for inguinal hernia repair: TEP, TAPP, or OPEN

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The use of endoscopic inguinal hernia repair has slowly increased in the past years, but the indications have remained vague. Some surgeons perform a tailored approach depending on patient or hernia characteristics, whereas others perform the same approach and technique for all hernias.

Methods

Based on these principles, a survey of 19 questions was conducted during the 18th Congress of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons, which took place in Geneva, Switzerland, in 2010, to determine surgeons’ preference depending on the hernia and the patient.

Results

All surgeons who attended the session (N = 100) responded to all questions. Eighty two percent of surgeons preferred a tailored approach, whereas 18 % used the same technique in all cases. Endoscopic techniques are used more frequently than the open approach in bilateral (7 vs. 93 %) and recurrent hernias (19 vs. 81 %), whereas in primary unilateral hernias all three techniques were used with almost similar frequency (32 % open, 39 % TAPP vs. 29 % TEP). TAPP was used more frequently than TEP, and even those surgeons who are expert in TEP preferred to perform a TAPP in difficult hernias, such as in obese patients and large scrotal hernias. Based on the age of patients, the open approach is preferred in patients younger than 18 years and older than 70 years, whereas the endoscopic approach is preferred in young active males and females, with a trend to use TAPP (44 %) more frequently than TEP (40 %) in females. Surgeons tended to use the open (vs. endoscopic) approach in patients with hematologic disorders (58 % open vs. 42 % endoscopic), previous laparotomy (59 % open vs. 41 % endoscopic) or emergency surgery (66 vs. 33 % in incarcerated hernias and 74 vs. 26 % in strangulated hernia).

Conclusions

This survey showed that most surgeons who perform an endoscopic approach for inguinal hernia as the first option are convinced that not all hernias are good indications for this approach. On the other hand, most surgeons think that it is better to be able to offer patients an endoscopic technique or an open approach depending on the case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eklund A, Rudberg C, Smedberg S, Enander LK, Leijonmarck CE, Osterberg J, Montgomery A (2006) Short-term results of a randomized clinical trial comparing Lichtenstein open repair with totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 93:1060–1068

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kuhry E, van Veen RN, Langeveld HR, Steyerberg EW, Jeekel J, Bonjer HJ (2007) Open or endoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair? A systematic review. Surg Endosc 21:161–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lau H, Patil NG, Yuen WK (2006) Day-case endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty versus open Lichtenstein hernioplasty for unilateral primary inguinal hernia in males: a randomized trial. Surg Endosc 20:76–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McCormack K, Wake B, Perez J, Fraser C, Cook J, McIntosh E, Vale L, Grant A (2005) Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 9:1–203 iii–iv

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Memon MA, Cooper NJ, Memon B, Memon MI, Abrams KR (2003) Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 90:1479–1492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PMNYH, Ross S, Grant AM, EU Hernia Trial lists Collaboration (2003) Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001785

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R (2005) Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs. Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 19:188–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Davies BW, Campbell WB (1995) Inguinal hernia repair: see one, do one, teach one? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 77:299–301

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Feliu-Palà X, Martín-Gómez M, Morales-Conde S, Fernández-Sallent E (2001) The impact of the surgeon’s experience on the results of laparoscopic hernia repair. Surg Endosc 15:1467–1470

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gainant A (2003) Where does laparoscopy fit in the treatment of inguinal hernia in 2003? J Chir 140(3):1

    Google Scholar 

  11. McCormack K, Wake B, Perez J, Fraser C, Cook J, McIntosh E, Vale L, Grant A (2005) Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 9(14):1–203

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Feliu X, Clavería R, Besora P, Camps J, Fernández-Sallent E, Viñas X, Abad JM (2011) Bilateral inguinal hernia repair: laparoscopic or open approach? Hernia 15(1):15–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dedemadi G, Sgourakis G, Karaliotas C, Christofides T, Kouraklis G, Karaliotas C (2006) Comparison of laparoscopic and open tension-free repair of recurrent inguinal hernias: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 20:1099–1104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Eklund A, Rudberg C, Leijonmarck CE, Rasmussen I, Spangen L, Wickbom G, Wingren U, Montgomery A (2007) Recurrent inguinal hernia: randomized multicenter trial comparing laparoscopic and Lichtenstein repair. Surg Endosc 21:634–640

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kouhia ST, Huttunen R, Silvasti SO, Heiskanen JT, Ahtola H, Uotila-Nieminen M, Kiviniemi VV, Hakala T (2009) Lichtenstein hernioplasty versus totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernioplasty in treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia—a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 249:384–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Karthikesalingam A, Markar SR, Holt PJ, Praseedom RK (2010) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic with open mesh repair of recurrent inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 97(1):4–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gong K, Zhang N, Lu Y, Zhu B, Zhang Z, Du D, Zhao X, Jiang H (2011) Comparison of the open tension-free mesh-plug, transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP), and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 25(1):234–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wullstein C, Strey C, Woeste G, Bechstein WO (2008) Inguinal hernia: laparoscopic or open surgery? Zentralbl Chir 133(5):433–439

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Holzheimer RG (2005) Inguinal hernia: classification, diagnosis and treatment–classic, traumatic and Sportsman’s hernia. Eur J Med Res 10(3):121–134

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Barrat C, Surlin V, Bordea A, Champault G (2003) Management of recurrent inguinal hernias: a prospective study of 163 cases. Hernia 7(3):125–129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Saggar VR, Sarangi R (2008) Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: a policy of selective mesh fixation over a 10-year period. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18:209–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Koch CA, Greenlee SM, Larson DR, Harrington JR, Farley DR (2006) Randomized prospective study of totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: fixation versus no fixation of mesh. JSLS 10(4):457–460

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Beattie GC, Kumar S, Nixon SJ (2000) Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair: mesh fixation is unnecessary. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 10(2):71–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T, Kehlet H, Wara P, Asmussen T, Juul P, Strand L, Andersen FH, Bay-Nielsen M (2011) Danish Hernia Database recommendations for the management of inguinal and femoral hernia in adults. Dan Med Bull 58(2):C4243

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL (1996) Open “tension-free” repair of inguinal hernias: the Lichtenstein technique. Eur J Surg 162:447–453

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Leibl BJ, Schmedt CG, Schwarz J, Däubler P, Kraft K, Schlossnickel B, Bittner R (1998) A single institution’s experience with transperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair. Am J Surg 175(6):446–451

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kapiris SA, Brough WA, Royston CM, O’Boyle C, Sedman PC (2001) Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair. A 7-year two-center experience in 3017 patients. Surg Endosc 15(9):972–975

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Brandt-Kerkhof A, van Mierlo M, Schep N, Renken N, Stassen L (2010) Follow-up period of 13 years after endoscopic total extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernias: a cohort study. Surg Endosc 25(5):1624–1629

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. McCormack K, Wake BL, Fraser C, Vale L, Perez J, Grant A (2005) Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review. Hernia 9:109–114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Swadia ND (2011) Laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal inguinal hernia repair: 9 year’s experience. Hernia 15(3):273–279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Edwards CC 2nd, Bailey RW (2000) Laparoscopic hernia repair: the learning curve. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 10:149–153

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lau H, Patil NG, Yuen WK, Lee F (2002) Learning curve for unilateral endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernioplasty. Surg Endosc 16:1724–1728

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Liem MS, van Steensel CJ, Boelhouwer RU, Weidema WF, Clevers GJ, Meijer WS, Vente JP, de Vries LS, van Vroonhoven TJ (1996) The learning curve for totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg 171:281–285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lovisetto F, Zonta S, Rota E, Bottero L, Faillace G, Turra G, Fantini A, Longoni M (2007) Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair: surgical phases and complications. Surg Endosc 21:646–652

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Elshof JW, Keus F, Burgmans JP, Clevers GJ, Davids PH, van Dalen T (2009) Feasibility of right-sided total extraperitoneal procedure for inguinal hernia repair after appendectomy: a prospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 23(8):1754–1758

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ramshaw BJ, Tucker J, Duncan T, Heithold D, Garcha I, Mason EM, Wilson JP, Lucas GW (1996) The effect of previous lower abdominal surgery on performing the total extraperitoneal approach to laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. Am Surg 62(4):292–294

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Uchida H, Matsumoto T, Endo Y, Kusumoto T, Muto Y, Kitano S (2011) Repeat laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair after primary laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair for inguinal hernia. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21(3):233–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Deeba S, Purkayastha S, Paraskevas P, Athanasiou T, Darzi A, Zacharakis E (2009) Laparoscopic approach to incarcerated and strangulated inguinal hernias. JSLS 13(3):327–331

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Legnani GL, Rasini M, Pastori S, Sarli D (2008) Laparoscopic trans-peritoneal hernioplasty (TAPP) for the acute management of strangulated inguino-crural hernias: a report of nine cases. Hernia 12(2):185–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ng KC, Wong KW, Mok FP (2010) An early experience of a novel technique: “no touch approach” preperitoneal hernioplasty for the incarcerated inguinal hernia. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20(10):851–855

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Itani KM, Fitzgibbons R Jr, Awad SS, Duh QY, Ferzli GS (2009) Management of recurrent inguinal hernias. J Am Coll Surg 209(5):653–658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, Bouillot JL, Campanelli G, Conze J, de Lange D, Fortelny R, Heikkinen T, Kingsnorth A, Kukleta J, Morales-Conde S, Nordin P, Schumpelick V, Smedberg S, Smietanski M, Weber G, Miserez M (2009) European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia 13(4):343–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Unit of Innovation in Minimally Invasive Surgery, University Hospital “Vírgen del Rocío”, Betis 65, 1º, 41010, Seville, Spain

    Salvador Morales-Conde & María Socas

  2. Surgical Unit, Hippokrateon Hospital, Athens, Greece

    Abe Fingerhut

Authors
  1. Salvador Morales-Conde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. María Socas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abe Fingerhut
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salvador Morales-Conde.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morales-Conde, S., Socas, M. & Fingerhut, A. Endoscopic surgeons’ preferences for inguinal hernia repair: TEP, TAPP, or OPEN. Surg Endosc 26, 2639–2643 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2247-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2247-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation