Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cost-effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review of the literature

  • Review
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a common condition in Western countries. It is unknown whether medical or surgical treatment is more cost-effective. This study was conducted to determine whether laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication or treatment by proton pump inhibitors is the most cost-effective for gastroesophageal reflux disease in the long term.

Methods

Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for articles published between January 1990 and 2010. The search results were screened by two independent reviewers for economic evaluations comparing costs and effects of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and proton pump inhibitors in adults eligible for both treatments. Cost and effectiveness or utility data were extracted for both treatment modalities. The quality of the economic evaluations was scored using a dedicated checklist, as were the levels of evidence.

Results

Four publications were included; all were based on decision analytic models. The economic evaluations were all of similar quality and all based on data with a variety of evidence levels. Surgery was more expensive than medical treatment in three publications. Two papers reported more quality-adjusted life-years for surgery. However, one of these reported more symptom-free months for medical treatment. In two publications surgery was considered to be the most cost-effective treatment, whereas the other two favored medical treatment.

Conclusions

The results with regard to cost-effectiveness are inconclusive. All four economic models are based on high- and low-quality data. More reliable estimates of cost-effectiveness based on long-term trial data are needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Locke GR III, Talley NJ, Fett SL, Zinsmeister AR, Melton LJ III (1997) Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastro-oesophageal reflux: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Gastroenterology 112:1448–1456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Raiha IJ, Impivaara O, Seppala M, Sourander LB (1992) Prevalence and characteristics of symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc 40:1209–1211

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Diaz-Rubio M, Moreno-Elola-Olaso C, Rey E, Locke GR, Rodriguez-Artalejo F (2004) Symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux: prevalence, severity, duration and associated factors in a Spanish population. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 19:95–105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Haque M, Wyeth JW, Stace NH, Talley NJ, Green R (2000) Prevalence, severity and associated features of gastro-oesophageal reflux and dyspepsia: a population-based study. N Z Med J 113:178–181

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bruley Des Varannes S, Marek L, Humeau B, Humeau B, Lecasble M, Colin R (2006) Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care: prevalence, epidemiology and quality of life of patients. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 30:364–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Khan M, Santana J, Donnellan C, Preston C, Moayyedi P (2007) Medical treatments in the short term management of reflux oesophagitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD003244

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stylopoulos N, Rattner DW (2005) The history of hiatal hernia surgery: from Bowditch to laparoscopy. Ann Surg 241:185–193

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lundell L, Miettinen P, Myrvold HE, Hatlebakk JG, Wallin L, Malm A, Sutherland I, Walan A (2007) Seven-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial comparing proton-pump inhibition with surgical therapy for reflux oesophagitis. Br J Surg 94:198–203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Spechler SJ, Lee E, Ahnen D, Goyal RK, Hirano I, Ramirez F, Raufman JP, Sampliner R, Schnell T, Sontag S, Vlahcevic ZR, Young R, Williford W (2001) Long-term outcome of medical and surgical therapies for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 285:2331–2338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Madan A, Minocha A (2006) Despite high satisfaction, majority of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients continue to use proton pump inhibitors after antireflux surgery. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 23:601–605

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Drummond MF, Schulper M, Torrance G, O’Brien B, Stoddart G (2005) Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  12. Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Oxford (2009) Levels of Evidence March 2009. http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1025. Accessed 1 Jun 2009

  13. Coley CM, Barry MJ, Spechler SJ (1993) Initial medical versus surgical therapy for complicated or chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD): a cost-effectiveness analysis. Gastroenterology 104:A5

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hurley S, Mckeage S, Ngaei G (1996) Cost-effectiveness of primary medical therapy versus surgery for the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). Aust J Hosp Pharm 26:171

    Google Scholar 

  15. Arguedas MR, Heudebert GR, Klapow JC, Centor RM, Eloubeidi MA, Wilcox CM, Spechler SJ (2004) Re-examination of the cost-effectiveness of surgical versus medical therapy in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: the value of long-term data collection. Am J Gastroenterol 99:1023–1028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Comay D, Adam V, da Silveira EB, Kennedy W, Mayrand S, Barkun AN (2008) The Stretta procedure versus proton pump inhibitors and laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Can J Gastroenterol 22:552–558

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Epstein D, Bojke L, Sculpher MJ (2009) Laparoscopic fundoplication compared with medical management for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: cost effectiveness study. BMJ 339:b2576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Romagnuolo J, Meier MA, Sadowski DC (2002) Medical or surgical therapy for erosive reflux esophagitis: cost-utility analysis using a Markov model. Ann Surg 236:191–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Beck JR, Pauker SG (1983) The Markov process in medical prognosis. Med Decis Making 3:419–458

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Peters MJ, Mukhtar A, Yunus RM, Khan S, Pappalardo J, Memon B, Memon MA (2009) Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery. Am J Gastroenterol 104:1548–1561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Draaisma WA, Buskens E, Bais JE, Simmermacher RK, Rijnhart-de Jong HG, Broeders IA, Gooszen HG (2006) Randomized clinical trial and follow-up study of cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic versus conventional Nissen fundoplication. Br J Surg 93:690–697

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rattner DW, Brooks DC (1995) Patient satisfaction following laparoscopic and open antireflux surgery. Arch Surg 130:289–293

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Koivukangas P, Sorasto A, Autio R, Södervik H, Mäkelä H, Hulkko A (1999) Comparison of costs between laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication: a prospective randomized study with a 3-month followup. J Am Coll Surg 188:368–376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Incarbone R, Peters JH, Heimbucher J, Dvorak D, Bremner CG, DeMeester TR (1995) A contemporaneous comparison of hospital charges for laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication. Surg Endosc 9:151–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Low DE (1995) Examination of outcome and cost data of open and laparoscopic antireflux operations at Virginia Mason Medical Center in Seattle. Surg Endosc 9:1326–1328

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Eshraghi N, Farahmand M, Soot SJ, Rand-Luby L, Deveney CW, Sheppard BC (1998) Comparison of outcomes of open versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication performed in a single practice. Am J Surg 175:371–374

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Harewood GC, Gostout CJ (2003) Cost analysis of endoscopic antireflux procedures: endoluminal plication vs. radiofrequency coagulation vs. treatment with a proton pump inhibitor. Gastrointest Endosc 58:493–499

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wiersema MJ, Levy MJ (2004) Cost analysis of endoscopic antireflux procedures: endoluminal plication vs. radiofrequency coagulation vs. treatment with a proton pump inhibitor. Gastrointest Endosc 59:749–750

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen D, Barber C, McLoughlin P, Thavaneswaran P, Jamieson GG, Maddern GJ (2009) Systematic review of endoscopic treatments for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg 96:128–136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lundell L, Miettinen P, Myrvold HE, Hatlebakk JG, Wallin L, Engström C (2009) Comparison of outcomes twelve years after antireflux surgery or omeprazole maintenance therapy for reflux esophagitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 7:1292–1298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gisbert JP, Cooper A, Karagiannis D, Hatlebakk J, Agréus L, Jablonowski H, Nuevo J (2009) Impact of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease on work absenteeism, presenteeism and productivity in daily life: a European observational study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 7:90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Myrvold HE, Lundell L, Miettinen P, Pedersen SA, Liedman B, Hatlebak J (2001) The cost of long term therapy for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a randomised trial comparing omeprazole and open antireflux surgery. Gut 49:488–494

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Grant A, Wileman S, Ramsay C, Bojke L, Epstein D, Sculpher M, Macran S, Kilonzo M, Vale L, Francis J, Mowat A, Krukowski Z, Heading R, Thursz M, Russell I, Campbell M (2008) The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of minimal access surgery amongst people with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease—a UK collaborative study. Health Technol Assess 12:1–181

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Bojke L, Hornby E, Sculpher M (2007) A comparison of the cost effectiveness of pharmacotherapy or surgery (laparoscopic fundoplication) in the treatment of GORD. Pharmacoeconomics 25:829–841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Heudebert GR, Marks R, Wilcox CM, Centor RM (1997) Choice of long-term strategy for the management of patients with severe esophagitis: a cost-utility analysis. Gastroenterology 112:1078–1086

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Van Den Boom G, Go PM, Hameeteman W, Dallemagne B, Ament AJ (1996) Cost effectiveness of medical versus surgical treatment in patients with severe or refractory gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in the Netherlands. Scand J Gastroenterol 31:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Viljakka M, Nevalainen J, Isolauri J (1997) Lifetime costs of surgical versus medical treatment of severe gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in Finland. Scand J Gastroenterol 32:766–772

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Dire CA, Jones MP, Rulyak SJ, Kahrilas PJ (2003) The economics of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 1:328–332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Nessen SC, Holcomb J, Tonkinson B, Hetz SP, Schreiber MA (1999) Early laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for recurrent reflux esophagitis: a cost-effective alternative to omeprazole. JSLS 3:103–106

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Cookson R, Flood C, Koo B, Mahon D, Rhodes M (2005) Short-term cost effectiveness and long-term cost analysis comparing laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with proton-pump inhibitor maintenance for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg 92:700–706

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Strate U, Emmermann A, Fibbe C, Layer P, Zornig C (2008) Laparoscopic fundoplication: Nissen versus Toupet two-year outcome of a prospective randomized study of 200 patients regarding preoperative esophageal motility. Surg Endosc 22:21–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Drs. A. S. Thijssen, I. A. M. J. Broeders, G. A. de Wit, and W. A. Draaisma have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands

    Anthony S. Thijssen, Ivo A. M. J. Broeders & Werner A. Draaisma

  2. Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    G. Ardine de Wit

  3. National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Prevention and Health Services Research, Bilthoven, The Netherlands

    G. Ardine de Wit

  4. Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, P.O. Box 1502, 3800 BM, Amersfoort, The Netherlands

    Werner A. Draaisma

Authors
  1. Anthony S. Thijssen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ivo A. M. J. Broeders
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. Ardine de Wit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Werner A. Draaisma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Werner A. Draaisma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thijssen, A.S., Broeders, I.A.M.J., de Wit, G.A. et al. Cost-effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review of the literature. Surg Endosc 25, 3127–3134 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1689-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1689-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation