Skip to main content
Log in

A contemporaneous comparison of hospital charges for laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease is increasingly recognized as a costeffective alternative to long-term medical therapy. This fact, coupled with the advent of laparoscopic fundoplication as a safe and efficacious alternative to open surgery, underscores the importance of determining the costs associated with laparoscopic treatment.

Hospital costs and charges of patients undergoing open (N=9) and laparoscopic (N=11) fundoplication were retrospectively analyzed. Both procedures were performed during the same time period (6/91–6/93), at the same hospital, and by the same surgical team. Operative time, and hospital stay, were recorded in addition to total, operating room, anesthesia, sterile supplies, and hospital room charges. Figures are reported as mean values ± standard error of the mean. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used for comparison of groups.

Operative time (221±18 vs 165±12 min, P=0.033) was longer in the laparoscopic group, while hospital stay (5.8±02 vs 8.8±04 days, P<0.001) was significantly shorter. Total hospital costs were similar for both groups of patients ($14,615±863 vs $15,891±921, P=0.247). Overall hospital charges were nearly identical ($26,634±1376 vs $27,189±1753, P=0.803). A detailed analysis demonstrated cost shifting, with laparoscopic fundoplication resulting in significantly higher charges associated with events in the operating room. Operating room ($6,064±252 vs $4,283±380, P=0.001), sterile supplies ($6,214±508 vs $5,403±390), and anesthesia charges ($1,593±76 vs $1,122±95, P<0.001) were all greater in the laparoscopic group. This was offset by significantly lower hospital-room charges following laparoscopy ($5,098±355 vs $6,983±511, P=0.006).

Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is not more expensive than its open counterpart. At present, laparoscopy results in higher operating-room charges which offsets savings from a shorter hospital stay. Improvements in technique and attention to limiting the cost of sterile supplies may ultimately result in a cost savings in favor of laparoscopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Apelgren KN, Blank ML, Slomski CA, Hadjis NS (1994) Reusable instruments are more cost-effective than disposable instruments for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 8: 32–34

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brooks D (1980) A prospective comparison of laparoscopic and tension-free open herniorrhaphy. Arch Surg 129: 361–366

    Google Scholar 

  3. Coley CM, Barry MJ, Spechler SJ, Williford WO, Mulley AG (1993) Initial medical vs surgical therapy for complicated or chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); a cost effectiveness analysis. Gastroenterology 104 (Suppl): A5

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cuschieri A, Hunter J, Wolfe B, Swanstrom LL, Hutson W (1993) Multicenter prospective evaluation of laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Preliminary report. Surg Endosc 7: 505–510

    Google Scholar 

  5. DeMeester TR, Bonavina L, Albertucci M (1986) Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Evaluation of primary repair in 100 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 204: 9–20

    Google Scholar 

  6. DeMeester TR, Wang C, Wernly JA, et al. (1980) Technique, indications, and clinical use of 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 79: 656–670

    Google Scholar 

  7. DeMeester TR (1992) Surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. In: Castell DO (ed) The esophagus. Little, Brown and Company, Boston, pp 579–625

    Google Scholar 

  8. Falk PM, Beart RW Jr, Wexner SD, et al. (1993) Laparoscopic colectomy: a critical appraisal. Dis Colon Rectum 36: 28–34

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fritts LL, Orlando R (1993) Laparoscopic appendectomy. A safety and cost analysis. Arch Surg 128: 521–525

    Google Scholar 

  10. Richter J (1992) Surgery for reflux disease—reflections of a gastroenterologist. N Engl J Med 326: 825–826

    Google Scholar 

  11. Senagore AJ, Luchtefeld MA, Mackeigan JM, Mazier WP (1993) Open colectomy versus laparoscopic colectomy: are there differences? Am Surg 59: 549–554

    Google Scholar 

  12. Spechler SJ, Department of Veterans Affairs Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Study Group (1992) Comparison of medical and surgical therapy for complicated gastroesophageal disease in veterans. N Engl J Med 326: 786–792

    Google Scholar 

  13. Spechler SJ (1992) Epidemiology and natural history of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Digestion 51(Suppl 1): 24–29

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stein HJ, DeMeester TR (1993) Indications, technique, and clinical use of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal motility monitoring in a surgical practice. Ann Surg 217: 128–137

    Google Scholar 

  15. Weerts JM, Dallemagne B, Hamoir E, Demarche M, et al. (1993) Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: detailed analysis of 132 patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc 5: 359–364

    Google Scholar 

  16. Weinbeck M, Barnert J (1989) Epidemiology of reflux disease and reflux esophagitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 24(Suppl 156): 7–13

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Incarbone, R., Peters, J.H., Heimbucher, J. et al. A contemporaneous comparison of hospital charges for laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication. Surg Endosc 9, 151–155 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00191956

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00191956

Key words

Navigation