Abstract
Introduction
While laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) can be performed using a myriad of techniques, the cost of each method varies. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of surgeon choice of technique on the cost of key steps in LA.
Methods
Surgeon operative notes, hospital invoice lists, and surgeon instrumentation preference sheets were obtained for all LA cases in 2008 at Cambridge Health Alliance (CHA). Only cases (N = 89) performed by fulltime staff general surgeons (N = 8) were analyzed. Disposable costs were calculated for the following components of LA: port access, mesoappendix division, and management of the appendiceal stump. The actual cost of each disposable was determined based on the hospital’s materials management database. Actual hospital reimbursements for LA in 2008 were obtained for all payers and compared with the disposable cost per case.
Results
Disposable cost per case for the three portions analyzed for 126 theoretical models were calculated and found to range from US $81 to US $873. The surgeon with the most cost-effective preferred method (US $299) utilized one multi-use endoscopic clip applier for mesoappendix division, two commercially available pretied loops for management of the appendiceal stump, and three 5-mm trocars as their preferred technique. The surgeon with the least cost-effective preferred method (US $552) utilized two staple firings for mesoappendix division, one staple firing for management of the appendiceal stump, and 12/5/10-mm trocars for access. The two main payers for LA patients were Medicaid and Health Safety Net, whose total hospital reimbursements ranged from US $264 to US $504 and from US $0 to US $545 per case, respectively, for patients discharged on day 1.
Discussion
Disposable costs frequently exceeded hospital reimbursements. Currently, there is no scientific literature that clearly illustrates a superior surgical method for performing these portions of LA in routine cases. This study suggests that surgeons should review the cost implications of their practice and to find ways to provide the most cost-effective care without jeopardizing clinical outcome.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV (1990) The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 132(5):910–925
Attwood SE, Hill AD, Murphy PG, Thornton J, Stephens RB (1992) A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Surgery 112(3):497–501
Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE, Snyder SK, Hendricks JC, Smith RW, Custer MD 3rd, Harrison JB (1994) A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg 219(6):725–731
Minne L, Varner D, Burnell A, Ratzer E, Clark J, Huan W (1997) Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. Prospective randomized study of outcomes. Arch Surg 132(7):708–711
Yau KK, Siu WT, Tang CN, Yang GP, Li MK (2007) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg 205(1):60–65
Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EAM (2004) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD001546. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub2
Daniel JF, Gurley LD, Kurtz BR, Chambers JF (1991) The use of an automatic stapling device for laparoscopic appendectomy. Obstet Gynecol 78(4):721–723
Kazemier G, In’t Hof KH, Saad S, Bonjer HJ, Sauerland S (2006) Securing the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: evidence for routine stapling? Surg Endosc 20(9):1473–1476. doi:10.1007/s00464-005-0525-7
Klaiber C, Wagner M, Metzger A (1994) Various stapling techniques in laparoscopic appendectomy: 40 consecutive cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4(3):205–209
Wagner M, Aronsky D, Tschudi J, Metzger A, Klaiber C (1996) Laparoscopic appendectomy. A prospective study of 267 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 10(9):895–899
Cristalli BG, Izard V, Jacob D, Levardon M (2007) Laparoscopic appendectomy using a clip applier. Surg Endosc 5(4):176–178
Aslan A, Karaveli C, Elpek O (2008) Laparoscopic appendectomy without clip or ligature. An experimental study. Surg Endosc 22(9):2084–2087
Elemen L, Yazir Y, Tugay M, Akay A, Aydin S, Yanar K, Ceylan S (2010) LigaSure compared with ligatures and endoclips in experimental appendectomy: how safe is it? Pediatric Surg Int. doi:10.1007/s00383-010-2557-x
Sajid MS, Rimple J, Cheek E, Baig MK (2009) Use of endo-GIA versus endo-loop for securing the appendicular stump in laparoscopic appendicectomy: a systematic review. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19(1):11–15
Sauerland S, Kazemier G (2007) Appendix stump closure during laparoscopic appendectomy (Protocol). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD006437. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006437
Fritts LL, Orlando R III (1993) Laparoscopic appendectomy: a safety and cost analysis. Arch Surg 128(5):521–525
Martin LC, Puente I, Sosa JL, Bassin A, Breslaw R, McKenney MG, Ginzburg E, Sleeman D (1995) Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. A prospective randomized comparison. Ann Surg 222(3):256–262
McCahill LE, Pellegrini CA, Wiggins T, Helton WS (1996) A clinical outcome and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Am J Surg 171(5):533–537. doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00022-0
Beldi G, Muggli K, Helbling C, Schlumpf R (2004) Laparoscopic appendectomy using endoloops: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 18(5):749–750. doi:10.1007/s00464-003-9156-z
Houben F, Willmen HR (1998) Simplified appendectomy without stump embedding. Experiences of 20 years conventional and 5 years laparoscopic application. Chirurg 69(1):66–71
Disclosures
Authors Steven Schwaitzberg has served on the Merck Speakers’ Bureau and as a consultant to Starion during the past 3 years. He has ongoing consultant activities with Olympus, Stryker, Surgiquest, Neatstitch, Cambridge Endo, and Endocore. Authors Thomas Chu and Ryan Chandhoke have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chu, T., Chandhoke, R.A., Smith, P.C. et al. The impact of surgeon choice on the cost of performing laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc 25, 1187–1191 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1342-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1342-1