Skip to main content
Log in

Single-port transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy: 43 consecutive cases

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In this modern era of minimally invasive surgery, cosmesis and early recovery are strongly emphasized. To reduce abdominal trauma and improve cosmesis, surgeons have adopted a single-port laparoscopic appendectomy for patients with acute appendicitis.

Methods

From August to December 2008, 43 cases of appendectomy were managed using the single-port transumbilical laparoscopic technique. A multichannel single port was created using a surgical glove (no. 6), three trocars, one-three-way catheter, and a wound retractor (Alexis). An umbilical incision (1.5–2.0 cm) was made transumbilically or infraumbilically. The intraabdominal procedures were almost identical to those for conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. The methods for mesenteric dissection and appendiceal stump ligation were identical. Despite slight discomforts with retraction and visualization, the procedure was nevertheless possible. A resected appendix was put into a finger of the single-port glove.

Results

The 43 study cases included 23 men and 20 women with a mean age of 31 years (range, 9–65 years) and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 22.3 kg/m2 (range 15–29.7 kg/m2). The mean operative time was 61.3 min (range 24–120 min). Drainage was used in two cases with perforated appendicitis. Bowel movement returned at a mean of 1.2 days, and oral feeding was resumed on postoperative day 1.2. The pathology showed negative inflammation in 4 cases (9.3%), suppurative appendicitis in 29 cases (67.4%), gangrenous appendicitis in 8 cases (18.6%), and perforated appendicitis in 2 cases. Only one patient required readmission due to pericecal inflammation and pain, and another patient needed a percutaneous drainage of fluid collection. Three minor umbilical wound complications were controlled conservatively.

Conclusions

Single-port appendectomy may require a longer operative time than laparoscopic appendectomy, but it is a feasible technique with good cosmetic results. It could be one of the alternative methods for treating acute appendicitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wheeless CR (1969) A rapid, inexpensive, and effective method of surgical sterilization by laparoscopy. J Reprod Med 3:65–69

    Google Scholar 

  2. Esposito C (1998) One-trocar appendectomy in pediatric surgery. Surg Endosc 12:177–178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Piskun G, Rajpal S (1999) Transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy utilizes no incisions outside the umbilicus. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 9:361–364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2008) Single-port-access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:1013–1016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Canes D, Desai MM, Aron M, Haber GP, Goel RK, Stein RJ, Kaouk JH, Gill IS (2008) Transumbilical single-port surgery: evolution and current status. Eur Urol 54:1020–1029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hong TH, You YK, Lee KH (2009) Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: scarless cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 23:1393–1397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaouk JH, Haber GP, Goel RK, Desai MM, Aron M, Rackley RR, Moore C, Gill IS (2008) Single-port laparoscopic surgery in urology: initial experience. Urology 71:3–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim HJ, Lee JI, Lee YS, Kang WK, Lee SK, You YK, Oh ST (2009) A case of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy and cholecystectomy in a fresh cadaver. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 25:59–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chock A, Seslar S, Stoopen E, Tristan A, Hashish H, Gonzalez JJ, Franklin ME Jr (2003) Needlescopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc 17:1451–1453

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ateş O, Hakgüder G, Olguner M, Akgür FM (2007) Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy conducted intracorporeally with the aid of a transabdominal sling suture. J Pediatr Surg 42:1071–1074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Roberts KE (2009) True single-port appendectomy: first experience with the “puppeteer technique”. Surg Endosc 23:1825–1830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cadeddu J, Fernandez R, Desai M, Bergs R, Tracy C, Tang SJ, Rao P, Desai M, Scott D (2009) Novel magnetically guided intraabdominal camera to facilitate laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: initial human experience. Surg Endosc 23:1894–1899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangarajan M, Parthasarathi R, Senthilnathan P, Praveenraj P (2008) Transumbilical flexible endoscopic cholecystectomy in humans: first feasibility study using a hybrid technique. Endoscopy 40:428–431

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Elazary R, Khalaileh A, Zamir G, Har-Lev M, Almogy G, Rivkind AI, Mintz Y (2009) Single-trocar cholecystectomy using a flexible endoscope and articulating laparoscopic instruments: a bridge to NOTES or the final form? Surg Endosc 23:969–972

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Hyung Jin Kim, Jae Im Lee, Yoon Suk Lee, In Kyu Lee, Jung Hyun Park, Sang Kuon Lee, Won Kyung Kang, Hyeon-Min Cho, Young Kyuong You, and Seong Taek have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Young Kyuong You or Seong Taek Oh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, H.J., Lee, J.I., Lee, Y.S. et al. Single-port transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy: 43 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 24, 2765–2769 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1043-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1043-9

Keywords

Navigation