Skip to main content
Log in

Single-trocar cholecystectomy using a flexible endoscope and articulating laparoscopic instruments: a bridge to NOTES or the final form?

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

NOTES cholecystectomy, may eliminate complications related to abdominal incisions. However, the nonmandatory gastrotomy and its safe closure is the main controversy accompanying this approach. Transvaginal access has minimal closure consequences but the safety of inserting extralong instruments between the intestines and having the angle of approach from below rather than from above is questionable. We conducted a study for performing cholecystectomy using a single laparoscopic trocar.

Methods

The single-trocar cholecystectomy technique was developed on five porcine animal models weighing 35–40 kg each. A 15-mm trocar was used, inserted transumbilicaly. Retraction of the gallbladder was achieved using an endoloop and transabdominal anchoring. Hartman’s pouch was manipulated with an endoscopic grasper, which was passed through the working channel of the endoscope, while dissection of the triangle of Callot was performed using articulating laparoscopic instruments.

Results

Single-trocar cholecystectomy was successfully performed in four of five porcine models. Average surgery time was 90 min (35–180 min). The technique was modified and improved throughout the study. No intraoperative complications occurred.

Conclusions

Single-trocar cholecystectomy is feasible and offers safe approach to this procedure. We assume that a single incision at the umbilicus generates minimal somatic pain, and achieves excellent cosmetic results. The translation of this technique to human subjects seems straightforward and raises the question of whether NOTES is the preferred technique for cholecystectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

LC:

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

NOTES:

Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery

References

  1. Legorreta AP et al (1993) Increased cholecystectomy rate after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JAMA 270:1429–1432

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lam CM, Murray FE, Cuschieri A (1996) Increased cholecystectomy rate after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Scotland. Gut 38:282–284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Steiner CA, Bass EB, Talamini MA, Pitt HA, Steinberg EP (1994) Surgical rates and operative mortality for open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Maryland. N Engl J Med 330:403–408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Slim K, Pezet D, Stencl J Jr et al (1995) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an original three-trocar technique. World J Surg 19:394–397

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kagaya T (2001) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy via two ports, using the “Twin-Port” system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 8:76–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gagner M, Garcia-Ruiz A (1998) Technical aspects of minimally invasive abdominal surgery performed with needlescopic instruments. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8:171–179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Flora ED, Wilson TG, Martin IJ, O’Rourke NA, Maddern GJ (2008) A review of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for intra-abdominal surgery: experimental models, techniques, and applicability to the clinical setting. Ann Surg 247:583–602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rolanda C, Lima E, Pego JM et al (2007) Third-generation cholecystectomy by natural orifices: transgastric and transvesical combined approach. Gastrointest Endosc 65:111–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Wattiez A, Mutter D, Coumaros D (2007) Surgery without scars: report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being. Arch Surg 142:823–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhu JF, Hu H, Ma YZ, Xu MZ, Li F (2008) Transumbilical endoscopic surgery: a preliminary clinical report. Surg Endosc [Epub ahead of print]

  11. Rané A, Rao P, Rao P (2008) Single-port-access nephrectomy and other laparoscopic urologic procedures using a novel laparoscopic port (R-Port). Urology 72:260–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mintz Y, Horgan S, Savu MK, Cullen J, Chock A, Ramamoorthy S, Easter DW, Talamini MA (2008) Hybrid natural orifice translumenal surgery (NOTES) sleeve gastrectomy: a feasibility study using an animal model. Surg Endosc 22:1798–1802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study was funded by Ethicon Endosurgery, Cincinnatti, OH, USA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ram Elazary.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elazary, R., Khalaileh, A., Zamir, G. et al. Single-trocar cholecystectomy using a flexible endoscope and articulating laparoscopic instruments: a bridge to NOTES or the final form?. Surg Endosc 23, 969–972 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0289-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0289-y

Keywords

Navigation