Skip to main content
Log in

Complications after transanal endoscopic microsurgical resection correlate with location of rectal neoplasms

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a technique that has found its place in routine practice due to its minimal invasive character and associated low morbidity. The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of anatomical variables of rectal neoplasms as well as surgeon experience on postoperative complications in patients undergoing TEM at a tertiary care center.

Methods

Data from 288 patients undergoing TEM over a 16 year period were entered in a prospective data base. Anatomical data of rectal neoplasms, operative data, and early postoperative outcome were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

Overall surgical complications [OR 7.0 (1.5–45,5); p < 0.01] and bleeding [OR 222 (82 – 14316); p < 0.01] correlated with the localization of the neoplasm on the lateral wall of the rectum. Furthermore there was a trend for more surgical overall complications as well as bleeding in neoplasms with a diameter of >2 cm and neoplasms located >8 cm from the anal verge. Complications did not correlate with the number of TEM procedures performed.

Conclusion

TEM resection of neoplasms located on the lateral rectal wall have a higher risk of bleeding. The learning curve for transanal endoscopic microsurgery appears to be negligible in surgeons with experience in minimal invasive surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buess G, Theiss R, Hutterer F, Pichlmaier H, Pelz C, Holfeld T, Said S, Isselhard W (1983) Transanal endoscopic surgery of the rectum - testing a new method in animal experiments. Leber Magen Darm 13:73–77

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Demartines N, von Flüe MO, Harder FH (2001) Transanal endoscopic microsurgical excision of rectal tumors: indications and results. World J Surg 25(7):870–875

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Neary P, Makin GB, White TJ, White E, Hartley J, MacDonald A, Lee PW, Monson JR (2003) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a viable operative alternative in selected patients with rectal lesions. Ann Surg Oncol 10(9):1106–1111

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gavagan JA, Whiteford MH, Swanstrom LL (2004) Full-thickness intraperitoneal excision by transanal endoscopic microsurgery does not increase short-term complications. Am J Surg 187(5):630–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Endreseth BH, Wibe A, Svinsas M, Marvik R, Myrvold HE (2005) Postoperative morbidity and recurrence after local excision of rectal adenomas and rectal cancer by transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Colorectal Dis 7(2):133–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Guerrieri M, Feliciotti F, Baldarelli M, Zenobi P, De Sanctis A, Lezoche G, Lezoche E (2003) Sphincter-saving surgery in patients with rectal cancer treated by radiotherapy and transanal endoscopic microsurgery: 10 years’ experience. Dig Liver Dis 35(12):876–880

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gao JD, Shao YF, Bi JJ, Shi SS, Liang J, Hu YH (2003) Local excision carcinoma in early stage. World J Gastroenterol 9(4):871–873

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. de Graaf EJ, Doornebosch PG, Stassen LP, Debets JM, Tetteroo GW, Hop WC (2002) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 38(7):904–910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Featherstone JM, Grabham JA, Fozard JB (2004) Peranal excision of large, rectal, villous adenomas. Dis Colon Rectum 47(1):86–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dafnis G, Pahlman L, Raab Y, Gustafsson UM, Graf W (2004) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: clinical and functional results. Colorectal Dis 6(5):336–342

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Koscinski T, Malinger S, Drews M (2003) Local excision of rectal carcinoma not-exceeding the muscularis layer. Colorectal Dis 5(2):159–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Palma P, Freudenberg S, Samel S, Post S (2004) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery : indications and results after 100 cases. Colorectal Dis 6:350–355

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kennedy ML, Lubowski DZ, King DW (2002) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery excision: is anorectal function compromised? Dis Colon Rectum 45(5):601–604

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Herman RM, Richter P, Walega P, Popiela T (2001) Anorectal sphincter function and rectal barostat study in patients following transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 16(6):370–376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bertelli L, Lorenzini L, Bertelli E (1996) The arterial vascularization of the large intestine. Anatomical and radiological study. Surg Radiol Anat 8(Suppl 1):A1–6, S1–59

    Google Scholar 

  16. DiDio LJ, Diaz-Franco C, Schemainda R, Bezerra AJ (1986) Morphology of the middle rectal arteries. A study of 30 cadaveric dissections. Surg Radiol Anat 8(4):229–236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The excellent secretarial assistance of I. Metzger is greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Schilling.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kreissler-Haag, D., Schuld, J., Lindemann, W. et al. Complications after transanal endoscopic microsurgical resection correlate with location of rectal neoplasms. Surg Endosc 22, 612–616 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9721-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9721-y

Keywords

Navigation