Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of Hyoid Bone Using 3D Geometric Morphometrics: An Anatomical Study and Discussion of Potential Clinical Implications

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to obtain a quantitative anatomical description of the hyoid bone using modern 3D reconstruction tools and to discuss potential applications of the knowledge in clinical practice. The study was conducted on 88 intact hyoid bones taken from cadavers during forensic autopsies (group 1) and on 92 bones from CT scan images of living adult subjects (group 2). Three-dimensional reconstructions were created from CT scan images using Amira 5.3.3® software. An anatomical and anthropological study of hyoid bones was carried out using metric and morphological analyses. Groups 1 and 2 were compared to evaluate the influence of muscle traction on hyoid bone shape. Characteristics of the hyoid bone were highly heterogeneous and were closely linked with the sex, height, and weight of the individuals. Length and width were significantly greater in men than in women (39.08 vs. 32.50 mm, p = 0.033 and 42.29 vs. 38.61 mm, p = 0.003), whereas the angle between the greater horns was larger in females (44.09 vs. 38.78, p = 0.007). There was a significant positive correlation between the height (Pearson coefficient correlation r = 0.533, p = 0.01) and weight (r = 0.497, p = 0.01) of subjects and the length of the hyoid bone. Significant metric differences were shown between group 1 and group 2. This very reproducible methodology is important because it may lead to clinical studies in, e.g., head and neck cancer or sleep apnea. Such studies are ongoing in our research program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nakano T, Muto H, Yoshioka I. Anatomical studies in the hyoid region of the mouse in term of evolutional importance. Anat Anz. 1988;167:105–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hilloowala RA. Comparative anatomical study of the hyoid apparatus in selected primates. Am J Anat. 1975;142:367–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Diego R, Pastor F, De Paz F, Potau JM, Bello-Hellegouarch G, Ferrero EM, Fisher RE. The head and neck muscles of the serval and tiger: homologies, evolution, and proposal of mammalian and veterinary muscle ontology. Anat Rec. 2012;295:2157–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Koebke J, Saternus KS. Morphology of the adult human hyoid bone. Z Rechtsmed. 1979;84:7–18.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Papadopoulos N, Lykaki-Anastopoulou G, Alvanidou E. The shape and size of the human hyoid bone and a proposal for an alternative classification. J Anat. 1989;163:249–60.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller KW, Walker PL, O’Halloran RL. Age and sex-related variation in hyoid bone morphology. J Forensic Sci. 1998;43:1138–43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pollard J, Piercecchi-Marti MD, Thollon L et al. Mechanisms of hyoid bone fracture after modelling: evaluation of anthropological criteria defining two relevant models. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;212(1–3):274. e1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mitterocker P, Gunz P. Advances in geometric morphometrics. Evol Biol. 2009;36:235–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zelditch ML, Swiderski DL, Sheets HD. Geometric morphometrics for biologists: a primer. 2nd ed. Waltham: Academic Press; 2012. p. 488.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Badawi-Fayad J, Cabanis EA. Three-dimensional Procrustes analysis of modern human craniofacial form. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2007;290:268–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Collard M, O’Higgins P. Ontogeny and homoplasy in the papionin monkey face. Evol Dev. 2000;3:322–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hennessy RJ, Stringer CB. Geometric morphometric study of the regional variation of modern human craniofacial form. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2002;117:37–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ponce de Leon M, Zollikofer C. Neanderthal cranial ontogeny and its implications for late hominid diversity. Nature. 2001;412:534–8.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bookstein FL. Introduction to methods for landmark data. In: Rohlf FJ, Bookstein FL, editors. Proceedings of the Michigan morphometrics workshop. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Museum of Zoology; 2000. p. 216–25.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rohlf JF, Marcus LF. A revolution in morphometrics. Trends Ecol Evol. 1993;8:129–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Higgins P. The study of morphological variation in the hominid fossil record: biology, landmarks and geometry. J Anat. 2000;197:103–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Klingenberg CP. MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Mol Ecol Resour. 2011;11:353–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gower JC. Generalized procrustes analysis. Psychometrika. 1975;40(1):33–51.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dryden I, Mardia KV. Statistical shape analysis. Chichester: Wiley; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pollanen MS, Ubelaker DH. Forensic significance of the polymorphism of the hyoid bone shape. J Forensic Sci. 1997;42:890–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Leksan I, Marcikic M, Nikolic V, Radic R, Selthofer R. Morphological classification and sexual dimorphism of hyoid bone: new approach. Coll Antropol. 2005;29(1):237–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mukhopadhyay PP. Morphometric features and sexual dimorphism of adult hyoid bone: a population specific study with forensic implications. J Forensic Leg Med. 2010;17:321–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Komenda S, Cerny M. Sex determination from the hyoid bone by means of discriminant analysis. Acta Univ Palacki Olomuc Fac Med. 1990;125:37–51.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Reesink EM, Van Immerseel AAH, Brand R, Bruintjes TJD. Sexual dimorphism of the hyoid bone? Int J Osteoarchaeol. 1999;9:357–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Greil H. Patterns of sexual dimorphism from birth to senescence. Coll Antropol. 2006;30:637–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rouvière H. Os hyoide. In: Delmas A (ed), Anatomie humaine. Tête et cou, vol. 1, 11th edn. Paris: Masson; 1981. pp. 114–447.

  27. Doual A, Leger JL, Doual JM, Hadjiat F. The hyoid bone and vertical dimension. Orthod Fr. 2003;74:333–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. O’Halloran RL, Lundy JK. Age and ossification of the hyoid bone: forensic implications. J Forensic Sci. 1987;32:1655–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shimizu Y, Kanetaka H, Kim YH, Okayama K, Kano M, Kikuchi M. Age-related morphological changes in the human hyoid bone. Cells Tissues Organs. 2005;180:185–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nikolic S, Micic J, Atanasijevic T, Djokic V, Djonic D. Analysis of neck injuries in hanging. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2003;24:179–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. D’Souza DH, Sathyanarayana H, Jayaramaiah K. Fusion in the hyoid bone: usefulness and implications. Med Sci Law. 2010;50:197–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gupta A, Kohli A, Aggarwal NK, Banerjee KK. Study of age of fusion of hyoid bone. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2008;10:253–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pearson WG Jr, Langmore SE, Zumwalt AC. Evaluating the structural properties of suprahyoid muscles and their potential for moving the hyoid. Dysphagia. 2011;26:345–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Youmans SR, Youmans GL, Stierwalt JA. Differences in tongue strength across age and gender: is there a diminished strength reserve? Dysphagia. 2009;24:57–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Spradley MK, Jantz RL. Sex estimation in forensic anthropology: skull versus postcranial elements. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56:289–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Balci Y, Yavuz MF, Cagdir S. Predictive accuracy of sexing the mandible by ramus flexure. Homo. 2005;55:229–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Green H, Curnoe D. Sexual dimorphism in South East Asian crania: a geometric morphometric approach. Homo. 2009;60:517–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kim DI, Lee UY, Park DK, et al. Morphometrics of the hyoid bone for human sex determination from digital photographs. J Forensic Sci. 2006;51:979–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kindschuh SC, Dupras TL, Cowgill LW. Determination of sex from the hyoid bone. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2010;143:279–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mukhopadhyay PP. Determination of sex from an autopsy sample of adult hyoid bones. Med Sci Law. 2012;52(3):152–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kim Y, McCullough GH. Maximum hyoid displacement in normal swallowing. Dysphagia. 2008;23:274–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Van der Kruis JG, Baijens LW, Speyer R, Zwijnenberg I. Biomechanical analysis of hyoid bone displacement in videofluoroscopy: a systematic review of intervention effects. Dysphagia. 2011;26:171–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Miller AJ. Neurophysiological basis of swallowing. Dysphagia. 1986;1:91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Dodds WJ, Logemann JA, Stewart ET. Radiologic assessment of abnormal oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;154:965–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Hirai H, Omura K, Harada H, Tohara H. Sequential evaluation of swallowing function in patients with unilateral neck dissection. Head Neck. 2010;32:896–904.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang TG, Chang YC, Chen WS, Lin PH, Hsiao TY. Reduction in hyoid bone forward movement in irradiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with dysphagia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:926–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Paik NJ, Kim SJ, Lee HJ, Jeon JY, Lim JY, Han TR. Movement of the hyoid bone and the epiglottis during swallowing in patients with dysphagia from different etiologies. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008;18:329–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. German RZ, Campbell-Malone R, Crompton AW, Ding P, Holman S, Konow N, Thexton AJ. The concept of hyoid posture. Dysphagia. 2011;26:97–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Armstrong JJ, Leigh MS, Sampson DD, Walsh JH, Hillman DR, Eastwood PR. Quantitative upper airway imaging with anatomic optical coherence tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;173:226–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Lin CH, Liao YF, Chen NH, Lo LJ, Chen YR. Three-dimensional computed tomography in obstructive sleep apneics treated by maxillomandibular advancement. Laryngoscope. 2011;121:1336–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Abramson ZR, Susarla S, Tagoni JR, Kaban L. Three-dimensional computed tomographic analysis of airway anatomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68:363–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Tsai HH, Ho CY, Lee PL, Tan CT. Sex differences in anthropometric and cephalometric characteristics in the severity of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2009;135:155–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Lam B, Ooi CG, Peh WC, et al. Computed tomographic evaluation of the role of craniofacial and upper airway morphology in obstructive sleep apnea in Chinese. Respir Med. 2004;98:301–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Yucel A, Unlu M, Haktanir A, Acar M, Fidan F. Evaluation of the upper airway cross-sectional area changes in different degrees of severity of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: cephalometric and dynamic CT study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:2624–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Walsh JH, Leigh MS, Paduch A, et al. Evaluation of pharyngeal shape and size using anatomical optical coherence tomography in individuals with and without obstructive sleep apnoea. J Sleep Res. 2008;17:230–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. van Lunteren E, Strohl KP. The muscles of the upper airways. Clin Chest Med. 1986;7:171–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Kairaitis K. Is the pharynx a muscular hydrostat? Med Hypotheses. 2010;74:590–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Fakhry.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fakhry, N., Puymerail, L., Michel, J. et al. Analysis of Hyoid Bone Using 3D Geometric Morphometrics: An Anatomical Study and Discussion of Potential Clinical Implications. Dysphagia 28, 435–445 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-013-9457-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-013-9457-x

Keywords

Navigation