Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of nitrogen source and empty bed residence time on the removal of styrene gaseous emissions by biotrickling filtration

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The removal of styrene-polluted air emissions by biotrickling filtration was performed to evaluate the influence of using nitrate and urea as a nitrogen source in the nutrient solution supplied to two bioreactors run in parallel under the same operational conditions for 3 months. The use of urea resulted in less biomass content along the packed bed and better performance of the process, with a maximum elimination capacity (EC) of 57.6 g C m−3 h−1 (removal efficiency (RE) of 88.3% and empty bed residence time (EBRT) of 60 s), which was around 54% higher than when using nitrate. EBRTs of 60, 30 and 15 s were evaluated with a urea-based nutrient supply. By decreasing the EBRT from 60 to 30 s the styrene concentration that could be treated with REs above 80% was almost the half, from 1,100 to 600 mg C m−3, resulting in ECs of 52.8 g C m−3 h−1. Working at 15 s was not possible to obtain REs higher than 40% with a maximum EC of 28.5 g C m−3 h−1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Paca J, Koutsky B, Maryska M, Halecky M (2001) Styrene degradation along the bed height of perlite biofilter. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 76:873–878

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Miller RR, Newhook R, Poole A (1994) Styrene production, use, and human exposure. Crit Rev Toxicol 24:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1994) OPPT fact sheets, styrene fact sheets: support document. US-EPA 749-F-95-019a

  4. European Commission (2010). Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control). Off J Eur Union L334:17–119

    Google Scholar 

  5. European Commission (2003). IPPC reference document on best availabe techniques in common waste water and gas treatment/management system in the chemical sector. European IPPC Bureau, Sevilla

  6. Devinny JS, Deshusses MA, Webster TS (1999) Biofiltration for air pollution control. CRC-Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kennes C, Rene ER, Veiga MC (2009) Bioprocesses for air pollution control. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 84:1419–1436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lu C, Lin M, Chu C (2002) Effects of pH, moisture, and flow pattern on trickle-bed air biofilter performance for BTEX removal. Adv Environ Res 6:99–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rene ER, López ME, Veiga MC, Kennes C (2010) Performance of a fungal monolith bioreactor for the removal of styrene from polluted air. Bioresour Technol 101:2608–2615

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Iranpour R, Cox HHJ, Deshusses MA, Schroeder ED (2005) Literature review of air pollution control biofilters and biotrickling filters for odor and volatile organic compound removal. Environ Prog 24:254–267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Paca J, Klapkova E, Halecky M, Jones K, Webster TS (2006) Interactions of hydrophobic and hydrophilic solvent component degradation in an air-phase biotrickling filter reactor. Environ Prog 25:365–372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim D, Cai ZL, Sorial GA (2005) Evaluation of trickle-bed air biofilter performance under periodic stressed operating conditions as a function of styrene loading. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 55:200–209

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sempere F, Gabaldón C, Martínez-Soria V, Marzal P, Penya-roja JM, Álvarez-Hornos FJ (2008) Performance evaluation of a biotrickling filter treating a mixture of oxygenated VOCs during intermittent loading. Chemosphere 73:1533–1539

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Atoche JC, Moe WM (2004) Treatment of MEK and toluene mixtures in biofilters: effect of operating strategy on performance during transient loading. Biotechnol Bioeng 86:468–481

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sempere F, Gabaldón C, Martínez-Soria V, Penya-roja JM, Álvarez-Hornos FJ (2009) Evaluation of a combined activated carbon prefilter and biotrickling filter system treating variable ethanol and ethyl acetate gaseous emissions. Eng Life Sci 9:317–323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Choi DS, Devinny JS, Deshusses MA (2004) Behavior of field-scale biotrickling filter under nonsteady state conditions. J Environ Eng-ASCE 130:322–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Martínez-Soria V, Gabaldon C, Penya-roja JM, Palau J, Álvarez-Hornos FJ, Sempere F, Soriano C (2009) Performance of a pilot-scale biotrickling filter in controlling the volatile organic compound emissions in a furniture manufacturing facility. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 59:998–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Popov VO, Bezborodov AM, Cavanagh M, Cross P (2004) Evaluation of industrial biotrickling filter at the flexographic printing facility. Environ Prog 23:39–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Santos S, Jones K, Abdul R, Boswell J, Paca J (2007) Treatment of wet process hardboard plant VOC emissions by a pilot scale biological system. Biochem Eng J 37:261–270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Steele JA, Ozis F, Fuhrman JA, Devinny JS (2005) Structure of microbial communities in ethanol biofilters. Chem Eng J 113:135–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cox HHJ, Sexton T, Shareefdeen ZM, Deshusses MA (2001) Thermophilic biotrickling filtration of ethanol vapors. Environ Sci Technol 35:2612–2619

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu Q, Babajide AE, Zhu P, Zou LP (2006) Removal of xylene from waste gases using biotrickling filters. Chem Eng Technol 29:320–325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tresse O, Lescob S, Rho D (2003) Dynamics of living and dead bacterial cells within a mixed-species biofilm during toluene degradation in a biotrickling filter. J Appl Microbiol 94:849–855

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Álvarez-Hornos FJ, Gabaldón C, Martínez-Soria V, Marzal P, Penya-roja JM, Sempere F (2007) Biofiltration of ethyl acetate under continuous and intermittent loading. Environ Prog 26:327–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jorio H, Bibeau L, Heitz M (2000) Biofiltration of air contaminated by styrene: effect of nitrogen supply, gas flow rate, and inlet concentration. Environ Sci Technol 34:1764–1771

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang C, Xi J, Hu H (2009) Effects of nitrogen source, empty bed residence time and inlet concentration on biofilter removal of chlorobenzene. Eng Life Sci 9:109–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Song J, Ramirez J, Kinney KA (2003) Nitrogen utilization in a vapor-phase biofilter. Water Res 37:4497–4505

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang H, Minuth B, Allen DG (2002) Effects of nitrogen and oxygen on biofilter performance. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 52:279–286

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Delhoménie MC, Bibeau L, Roy S, Brzezinski R, Heitz M (2001) Influence of nitrogen on the degradation of toluene in a compost-based biofilter. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 76:997–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sorial GA, Smith FL, Suidan MT, Pandit A, Biswas P, Brenner RC (1998) Evaluation of trickle-bed air biofilter performance for styrene removal. Water Res 32:1593–1603

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE, Eaton AD (1998). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Environment Federation, Washington

  32. Grady CPL, Daigger GT, Lim HC (1999) Biological wastewater treatment, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rene ER, Veiga MC, Kennes C (2009) Performance of a biofilter for the removal of high concentrations of styrene under steady and non-steady state conditions. J Hazard Mater 168:282–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kim J, Ryu HW, Jung DJ, Lee TH, Cho K-S (2005) Styrene degradation in a polyurethane biofilter inoculated with Pseudomonas sp. IS-3. J Microbiol Biotechn 15:1207–1213

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hwang JW, Choi CY, Park S, Lee EY (2008) Biodegradation of gaseous styrene by Brevibacillus sp using a novel agitating biotrickling filter. Biotechnol Lett 30:1207–1212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial support by the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (Spain, research project CTM 2010-15031 with FEDER funds) is acknowledged. Feliu Sempere and Jordi Palau thank the Universitat de València and Generalitat Valenciana (Spain) for the award of their respective pre-doctoral fellowships.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carmen Gabaldón.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sempere, F., Martínez-Soria, V., Palau, J. et al. Effects of nitrogen source and empty bed residence time on the removal of styrene gaseous emissions by biotrickling filtration. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 34, 859–867 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-011-0536-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-011-0536-9

Keywords

Navigation