Skip to main content
Log in

Variation in phenology and density differentially affects predator–prey interactions between salamanders

  • Community ecology – original research
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Variation in the timing of breeding (i.e., phenological variation) can affect species interactions and community structure, in part by shifting body size differences between species. Body size differences can be further altered by density-dependent competition, though synergistic effects of density and phenology on species interactions are rarely evaluated. We tested how field-realistic variation in phenology and density affected ringed salamander (Ambystoma annulatum) predation on spotted salamanders (Ambystoma maculatum), and whether these altered salamander dynamics resulted in trophic cascades. In outdoor mesocosms, we experimentally manipulated ringed salamander density (low/high) and breeding phenology (early/late) of both species. Ringed salamander body size at metamorphosis, development, and growth were reduced at higher densities, while delayed phenology increased hatchling size and larval development, but reduced relative growth rates. Survival of ringed salamanders was affected by the interactive effects of phenology and density. In contrast, spotted salamander growth, size at metamorphosis, and survival, as well as the biomass of lower trophic levels, were negatively affected primarily by ringed salamander density. In an additional mesocosm experiment, we isolated whether ringed salamanders could deplete shared resources prior to their interactions with spotted salamanders, but instead found direct interactions (e.g., predation) were the more likely mechanism by which ringed salamanders limited spotted salamanders. Overall, our results indicate the effects of phenological variability on fitness-related traits can be modified or superseded by differences in density dependence. Identifying such context dependencies will lead to greater insight into when phenological variation will likely alter species interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alford RA, Wilbur HM (1985) Priority effects in experimental pond communities: competition between Bufo and Rana. Ecology 66:1097–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almany GR (2003) Priority effects in coral reef fish communities. Ecology 84:1920–1935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altwegg R (2002) Predator-induced life-history plasticity under time constraints in pool frogs. Ecology 83:2542–2551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altwegg R, Reyer HU (2003) Patterns of natural selection on size at metamorphosis in water frogs. Evolution 57:872–882

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson TL, Semlitsch RD (2014) High intraguild predator density induces thinning effects on and increases temporal overlap with prey populations. Popul Ecol 56:265–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson TL, Semlitsch RD (2016) Top predators and habitat complexity alter an intraguild predation module in pond communities. J Anim Ecol 85:548–558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson TL, Whiteman HH (2015) Non-additive effects of intra- and interspecific competition between two larval salamanders. J Anim Ecol 84:765–772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson TL et al (2015) Abundance and phenology patterns of two pond-breeding salamanders determine species interactions in natural populations. Oecologia 177:761–773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson TL, Linares C, Dodson K, Semlitsch RD (2016a) Variability in functional response curves among larval salamanders: comparisons across species and size classes. Can J Zool 94:23–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson TL et al (2016b) Differences in larval allometry among three ambystomatid salamanders. J Herpetol 50:464–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker BM, Walker S (2015) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes, R package version 1.1-9 edn

  • Blaustein L, Friedman J, Fahima T (1996) Larval Salamandra drive temporary pool community dynamics: evidence from an artificial pool experiment. Oikos 76:392–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boone MD, Scott DE, Niewiarowski PH (2002) Effects of hatching time for larval ambystomatid salamanders. Copeia 2002:511–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Both C, Van Asch M, Bijlsma RG, Van Den Burg AB, Visser ME (2009) Climate change and unequal phenological changes across four trophic levels: constraints or adaptations? J Anim Ecol 78:73–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brodin T, Johansson F (2002) Effects of predator-induced thinning and activity changes on life history in a damselfly. Oecologia 132:316–322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brundage A, Benbow ME, Tomberlin JK (2014) Priority effects on the life-history traits of two carrion blow fly (Diptera, Calliphoridae) species. Ecol Entomol 39:539–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CaraDonna PJ, Iler AM, Inouye DW (2014) Shifts in flowering phenology reshape a subalpine plant community. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:4916–4921

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH, Slatyer RO (1977) Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. Am Nat 111:1119–1144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durant JM et al (2005) Timing and abundance as key mechanisms affecting trophic interactions in variable environments. Ecol Lett 8:952–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durant JM, Hjermann DØ, Ottersen G, Stenseth NC (2007) Climate and the match or mismatch between predator requirements and resource availability. Clim Res (CR) 33:271–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earl JE, Whiteman HH (2015) Are commonly used fitness predictors accurate? A meta-analysis of amphibian size and age at metamorphosis. Copeia 103:297–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eitam A, Blaustein L, Mangel M (2005) Density and intercohort priority effects on larval Salamandra salamandra in temporary pools. Oecologia 146:36–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ficetola GF, Maiorano L (2016) Contrasting effects of temperature and precipitation change on amphibian phenology, abundance and performance. Oecologia 181:683–693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forrest JRK (2015) Plant-pollinator interactions and phenological change: what can we learn about climate impacts from experiments and observations? Oikos 124:4–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrest J, Miller-Rushing AJ (2010) Toward a synthetic understanding of the role of phenology in ecology and evolution. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B Biol Sci 365:3101–3112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox J, Weisberg S (2011) An R companion to applied regression, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Geange SW, Stier AC (2010) Priority effects and habitat complexity affect the strength of competition. Oecologia 163:111–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez JP, Chalcraft DR (2012) Synergistic effects of multiple mechanisms drive priority effects within a tadpole assemblage. Oikos 121:259–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holomuzki JR, Collins JP, Brunkow PE (1994) Trophic control of fishless ponds by tiger salamander larvae. Oikos 71:55–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopper KR, Crowley PH, Kielman D (1996) Density dependence, hatching synchrony, and within-cohort cannibalism in young dragonfly larvae. Ecology 77(1):191–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter AF, Elkinton JS (2001) Interaction between phenology and density effects on mortality from natural enemies. J Anim Ecol 68:1093–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Indermaur L, Schmidt BR, Tockner K, Schaub M (2010) Spatial variation in abiotic and biotic factors in a floodplain determine anuran body size and growth rate at metamorphosis. Oecologia 163:637–649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kardol P, Souza L, Classen AT (2013) Resource availability mediates the importance of priority effects in plant community assembly and ecosystem function. Oikos 122:84–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louette G, De Meester L (2007) Predation and priority effects in experimental zooplankton communities. Oikos 116:419–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney AM, CaraDonna PJ, Inouye DW, Barr B, Bertelsen CD, Waser NM (2012) Asynchronous changes in phenology of migrating Broad-tailed Hummingbirds and their early-season nectar resources. Ecology 93:1987–1993

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe NB, Monaghan P (2001) Compensation for a bad start: grow now, pay later? Trends Ecol Evol 16:254–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller TEX, Rudolf VHW (2011) Thinking inside the box: community-level consequences of stage-structured populations. Trends Ecol Evol 26:457–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller-Rushing AJ, Hoye TT, Inouye DW, Post E (2010) The effects of phenological mismatches on demography. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B: Biol Sci 365:3177–3186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin PJ (1987) Predation, breeding asynchrony, and the outcome of competition among treefrog tadpoles. Ecology 68:675–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murillo-Rincón AP, Kolter NA, Laurila A, Orizaola G (2017) Intraspecific priority effects modify compensatory responses to changes in hatching phenology in an amphibian. J Anim Ecol 86:128–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H, O’Hara RB (2013) A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol 4:133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakazawa T, Doi H (2012) A perspective on match/mismatch of phenology in community contexts. Oikos 121:489–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosaka M, Katayama N, Kishida O (2015) Feedback between size balance and consumption strongly affects the consequences of hatching phenology in size-dependent predator-prey interactions. Oikos 124:225–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orizaola G, Dahl E, Laurila A (2010) Compensating for delayed hatching across consecutive life-history stages in an amphibian. Oikos 119:980–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orizaola G, Dahl E, Laurila A (2014) Compensatory growth strategies are affected by the strength of environmental time constraints in anuran larvae. Oecologia 174:131–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ousterhout BH, Semlitsch RD (2016) Non-additive response of larval ringed salamanders to intraspecific density. Oecologia 180:1137–1145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ousterhout BH, Anderson TL, Drake DL, Peterman WE, Semlitsch RD (2015) Habitat traits and species interactions differentially affect abundance and body size in pond-breeding amphibians. J Anim Ecol 84:914–924

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pace ML, Cole JJ, Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF (1999) Trophic cascades revealed in diverse ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol 14:483–488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parmesan C (2006) Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:637–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petranka JW (1998) Salamanders of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington [D.C.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Polis GA, Myers CA, Holt RD (1989) The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation: potential competitors that eat each other. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:297–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing, 3.3.0 edn. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafferty NE, Ives AR (2011) Effects of experimental shifts in flowering phenology on plant-pollinator interactions. Ecol Lett 14:69–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rafferty NE, Caradonna PJ, Burkle LA, Iler AM, Bronstein JL (2013) Phenological overlap of interacting species in a changing climate: an assessment of available approaches. Ecol Evol 3:3183–3193

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rasband WS (1997) ImageJ, US National Institutes of Health. Bethesda, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen NL, Rudolf VHW (2015) Phenological synchronization drives demographic rates of populations. Ecology 96:1754–1760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen NL, Rudolf VHW (2016) Individual and combined effects of two types of phenological shifts on predator-prey interactions. Ecology 97:3414–3421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen NL, Van Allen BG, Rudolf VHW (2014) Linking phenological shifts to species interactions through size-mediated priority effects. J Anim Ecol 83:1206–1215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reed TE, Gienapp P, Visser ME (2015) Density dependence and microevolution interactively determine effects of phenology mismatch on population dynamics. Oikos 124:81–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revilla T, Encinas-Viso F, Loreau M (2014) (A bit) Earlier or later is always better: phenological shifts in consumer–resource interactions. Theor Ecol 7:149–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowland FE, Rawlings MB, Semlitsch RD (2017) Joint effects of resources and amphibians on pond ecosystems. Oecologia 183:237–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott DE (1994) The effect of larval density on adult demographic traits in Ambystoma opacum. Ecology 75:1383–1396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch RD, Anderson TL (2016) Structure and dynamics of Spotted Salamander (Ambystoma maculatum) populations in Missouri. Herpetologica 72:81–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch RD, Scott DE, Pechmann JH (1988) Time and size at metamorphosis related to adult fitness in Ambystoma talpoideum. Ecology 69:184–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch RD, Anderson TL, Osbourn MS, Ousterhout BH (2014) Structure and dynamics of ringed salamander (Ambystoma annulatum) populations in Missouri. Herpetologica 70:14–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks B, Bingley M (1994) Priority effects and species coexistence: experiments with fungal-breeding Drosophila. J Anim Ecol 63:799–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sredl MJ, Collins JP (1991) The effect of ontogeny on interspecific interactions in larval amphibians. Ecology 72:2232–2239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stier A, Geange SW, Hanson KM, Bolker B (2013) Predator density and timing of arrival affect reef fish community assembly. Ecology 94:1057–1068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stoks R, Block MD, McPeek MA (2006) Physiological costs of compensatory growth in a damselfly. Ecology 87:1566–1574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Todd BD, Scott DE, Pechmann JH, Gibbons JW (2011) Climate change correlates with rapid delays and advancements in reproductive timing in an amphibian community. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B: Biol Sci 278:2191–2197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban MC (2013) Evolution mediates the effects of apex predation on aquatic food webs. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B: Biol Sci 280:20130859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban MC, Tewksbury JJ, Sheldon KS (2012) On a collision course: competition and dispersal differences create no-analogue communities and cause extinctions during climate change. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B: Biol Sci 279:272–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Buskirk J, Smith DC (1991) Density-dependent population regulation in a salamander. Ecology 72:1747–1756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Buskirk J, Yurewicz KL (1998) Effects of predators on prey growth rate: relative contributions of thinning and reduced activity. Oikos 82:20–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser ME, Both C (2005) Shifts in phenology due to climate change: the need for a yardstick. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B: Biol Sci 272:2561–2569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walls SC (1995) Differential vulnerability to predation and refuge use in competing larval salamanders. Oecologia 101:86–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur HM (1972) Competition, predation, and the structure of the Ambystoma-Rana sylvatica community. Ecology 53:3–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur HM, Alford RA (1985) Priority effects in experimental pond communities: responses of Hyla to Bufo and Rana. Ecology 66:1106–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wissinger SA (1989) Seasonal variation in the intensity of competition and predation among dragonfly larvae. Ecology 70:1017–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang LH, Rudolf VH (2010) Phenology, ontogeny and the effects of climate change on the timing of species interactions. Ecol Lett 13:1–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank K. Romine C. Linares, K. Dodson, L. Hollins, and C. Goodson for helping set up the experiment and collect larvae and metamorphs; M. Rawlings for sampling help and zooplankton enumeration; and B. Sonderman, T. Little, N. Emerich, P. Willis, and J. Gorman-McAdams for logistical help. R. Holdo, M. Gompper, D. Finke, M. Boone, and the Holdo/Semlitsch labs provided extensive feedback on the previous drafts of this manuscript. This work was supported by funding from the Department of Defense (SERDP RC2155) and a GAANN fellowship to T.L.A. Animals were collected under MDC permit 15992, and all experiments approved by the University of Missouri ACUC (7403).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TLA and RDS designed the study, TLA and FER performed the study, FER performed laboratory analysis, TLA analyzed data and wrote the manuscript, and TLA and FER edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas L. Anderson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by Joel Trexler.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 921 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anderson, T.L., Rowland, F.E. & Semlitsch, R.D. Variation in phenology and density differentially affects predator–prey interactions between salamanders. Oecologia 185, 475–486 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-017-3954-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-017-3954-9

Keywords

Navigation