Abstract
Metacommunity patterns and underlying processes in aquatic organisms have typically been studied within a drainage basin. We examined variation in the composition of six freshwater organismal groups across various drainage basins in Finland. We first modelled spatial structures within each drainage basin using Moran eigenvector maps. Second, we partitioned variation in community structure among three groups of predictors using constrained ordination: (1) local environmental variables, (2) spatial variables, and (3) dummy variable drainage basin identity. Third, we examined turnover and nestedness components of multiple-site beta diversity, and tested the best fit patterns of our datasets using the “elements of metacommunity structure” analysis. Our results showed that basin identity and local environmental variables were significant predictors of community structure, whereas within-basin spatial effects were typically negligible. In half of the organismal groups (diatoms, bryophytes, zooplankton), basin identity was a slightly better predictor of community structure than local environmental variables, whereas the opposite was true for the remaining three organismal groups (insects, macrophytes, fish). Both pure basin and local environmental fractions were, however, significant after accounting for the effects of the other predictor variable sets. All organismal groups exhibited high levels of beta diversity, which was mostly attributable to the turnover component. Our results showed consistent Clementsian-type metacommunity structures, suggesting that subgroups of species responded similarly to environmental factors or drainage basin limits. We conclude that aquatic communities across large scales are mostly determined by environmental and basin effects, which leads to high beta diversity and prevalence of Clementsian community types.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alahuhta J, Heino J (2013) Spatial extent, regional specificity and metacommunity structuring in lake macrophytes. J Biogeogr 40:1572–1582
Alahuhta J, Kanninen A, Vuori KM (2012) Response of macrophyte communities and status metrics to natural gradients and land use in boreal lakes. Aquat Bot 103:106–114
Alahuhta J, Rääpysjärvi J, Hellsten S, Kuoppala M, Aroviita J (2015) Species sorting drives variation of boreal lake and river macrophyte communities. Community Ecol 16:76–85
Alahuhta J, Hellsten S, Kuoppala M, Riihimäki J (2016) Regional and local determinants of macrophyte community compositions in high-latitude lakes of Finland. Hydrobiologia. doi:10.1007/s10750-016-2843-2
Anderson MJ, Crist TO, Chase JM, Vellend M, Inouye BD, Freestone AL, Sanders N, Cornell HV, Comita LS, Davies KF, Harrison SP, Kraft NJB, Stegen JC, Swenson NG (2011) Navigating the multiple meanings of β diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecol Lett 14:19–28
Baselga A (2010) Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19:134–143
Beck J, Ballesteros-Mejia L, Buchmann CM, Dengler J, Fritz SA, Gruber B, Hof C, Jansen F, Knapp S, Kreft H, Schneider A-K, Winter M, Dormann CF (2012) What’s on the horizon for macroecology? Ecography 35:673–683
Beisner BE, Peres-Neto PR, Lindström E, Barnett A, Longhi ML (2006) The role of dispersal in structuring lake communities from bacteria to fish. Ecology 87:2895–2991
Bini LM, Landeiro VL, Padial AA, Siqueira T, Heino J (2014) Nutrient enrichment is related to two facets of beta diversity for stream invertebrates across the United States. Ecology 95:1569–1578
Blanchet FG, Legendre P, Borcard D (2008) Forward selection of explanatory variables. Ecology 89:2623–2632
Bonada N, Dolédec S, Statzner B (2012) Spatial autocorrelation patterns of stream invertebrates: exogenous and endogenous factors. J Biogeogr 39:56–68
Borcard D, Legendre P (2002) All-scale spatial analysis of ecological data by means of principal coordinates of neighbour matrices. Ecol Model 153:51–68
Borcard D, Legendre P, Drapeau P (1992) Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73:1045–1055
Borcard D, Gillet F, Legendre P (2011) Numerical Ecology with R. Springer, New York
Clements FE (1936) Nature and structure of the climax. J Ecol 24:252–284
Cottenie K (2005) Integrating environmental and spatial processes in ecological community dynamics. Ecol Lett 8:1175–1182
Cottenie K, Nuytten N, Michels E, De Meester L (2003) Zooplankton metacommunity structure: regional versus local biotic and abiotic processes in a set of interconnected ponds. Ecology 84:991–1000
da Silva PG, Hernández MIM (2015) Scale-dependence of processes structuring dung beetle metacommunities using functional diversity and community deconstruction approaches. PLoS One 10:e0123030
Dallas T (2013) Metacom: analysis of the “elements of metacommunity structure”. R package version 1.2. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=metacom. Accessed 20 Sept 2015
Dallas T, Drake JM (2014) Relative importance of environmental, geographic, and spatial variables on zooplankton metacommunities. Ecosphere 5:art104
De Bie T, De Meester L, Brendonck L, Martens K, Goddeeris B, Ercken D, Hampel H, Denys L, Vanhecke L, Van der Gucht K, Van Wichelen J, Vyverman W, Declerck SAJ (2012) Body size and dispersal mode as key traits determining metacommunity structure of aquatic organisms. Ecol Lett 15:740–747
Declerck SAJ, Coronel JS, Legendre P, Brendonck L (2011) Scale dependency of processes structuring metacommunities of cladocerans in temporary pools of High-Andes wetlands. Ecography 34:296–305
Dray S, Pélissier R, Couteron P, Fortin MJ, Legendre P, Peres-Neto PR, Bellier E, Bivand R, Blanchet FG, De Cáceres M, Dufour AB, Heegaard E, Jombart T, Munoz F, Oksanen J, Thioulouse J, Wagner HH (2012) Community ecology in the age of multivariate multiscale spatial analysis. Ecol Monogr 82:257–275
Gascón, S, Cañedo-Argüelles M, Nebra A, Ruhí A, Rieradevall M, Caiola N, Sala J, Ibàñez C, Quintana XD, Boix D (2016) Environmental filtering determines metacommunity structure in wetland microcrustaceans. Oecologia 181:193–205
Gauch HG (1982) Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Gilbert B, Bennett JR (2010) Partitioning variation in ecological communities: do the numbers add up? J Appl Ecol 47:1071–1082
Gonçalves-Souza T, Romero GQ, Cottenie K (2014) Metacommunity versus biogeography: a case study of two groups of neotropical vegetation-dwelling arthropods. PLoS One 9:e115137
Göthe E, Angeler DG, Sandin L (2013) Metacommunity structure in a small boreal stream network. J Anim Ecol 82:449–458
Grönroos M, Heino J, Siqueira T, Landeiro VL, Kotanen J, Bini LM (2013) Metacommunity structuring in stream networks: roles of dispersal mode, distance type and regional environmental context. Ecol Evol 3:4473–4487
Hawkins BA, Porter EE (2003) Water–energy balance and the geographic pattern of species richness of western Palearctic butterflies. Ecol Entomol 28:678–686
Heino J (2011) A macroecological perspective of diversity patterns in the freshwater realm. Freshw Biol 56:1703–1722
Heino J (2013) Does dispersal ability affect the relative importance of environmental control and spatial structuring of littoral macroinvertebrate communities? Oecologia 171:971–980
Heino J, Alahuhta J (2015) Elements of regional beetle faunas: faunal variation and compositional breakpoints along climate, land cover and geographical gradients. J Anim Ecol 84:427–441
Heino J, Muotka T, Paavola R (2003) Determinants of macroinvertebrate diversity in headwater streams: regional and local influences. J Anim Ecol 72:425–434
Heino J, Grönroos M, Soininen J, Virtanen R, Muotka T (2012) Context dependency and metacommunity structuring in boreal headwater streams. Oikos 121:537–544
Heino J, Melo AS, Bini LM, Altermatt F, Al-Shami SA, Angeler D, Bonada N, Brand C, Callisto M, Cottenie K, Dangles O, Dudgeon D, Encalada A, Göthe E, Grönroos M, Hamada N, Jacobsen D, Landeiro VL, Ligeiro R, Martins RT, Miserendino ML, Md Rawi CS, Rodrigues M, Roque FO, Sandin L, Schmera D, Sgarbi LF, Simaika J, Siqueira T, Thompson RM, Townsend CR (2015a) A comparative analysis reveals weak relationships between ecological factors and beta diversity of stream insect metacommunities at two spatial levels. Ecol Evol 5:1235–1248
Heino J, Melo AS, Siqueira T, Soininen J, Valanko S, Bini LM (2015b) Metacommunity organisation, spatial extent and dispersal in aquatic systems: patterns, processes and prospects. Freshw Biol 60:845–869
Heino J, Nokela T, Soininen J, Tolkkinen M, Virtanen L, Virtanen R (2015c) Elements of metacommunity structure and community-environment relationships in stream organisms. Freshw Biol 60:973–988
Heino J, Soininen J, Alahuhta J, Lappalainen J, Virtanen R (2015d) A comparative analysis of metacommunity types in the freshwater realm. Ecol Evol 5:1525–1537
Heino J, Nokela T, Soininen J, Tolkkinen M, Virtanen L, Virtanen R (2015e) Elements of metacommunity structure and community-environment relationships in stream organisms. Freshw Biol 60:973–988
Hoeinghaus DJ, Winemiller KO, Birnbaum JS (2007) Local and regional determinants of stream fish assemblage structure: inferences based on taxonomic vs. functional groups. J Biogeogr 34:324–338
Hortal J, Diniz-Filho JAF, Bini LM, Rodríguez MÁ, Baselga A, Nogués-Bravo D, Rangel TF, Hawkins BA, Lobo JM (2011) Ice age climate, evolutionary constraints and diversity patterns of European dung beetles. Ecol Lett 14:741–748
Jenkins DG, Ricklefs RE (2011) Biogeography and ecology: two views of one world. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 366:2331–2335
Jocque M, Field R, Brendonck L, de Meester L (2010) Climatic control of dispersal—ecological specialization trade-offs: a metacommunity process at the heart of the latitudinal diversity gradient? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19:244–252
Kristiansen J (1996) Dispersal by freshwater algae—a review. Hydrobiologia 336:151–157
Landeiro VL, Bini LM, Melo AS, Pes AMO, Magnusson WE (2012) The roles of dispersal limitation and environmental conditions in controlling caddisfly (Trichoptera) assemblages. Freshw Biol 57:1554–1564
Landeiro VL, Magnusson WE, Melo AS, Espirito-Santo HMV, Bini LM (2011) Spatial eigenfunction analyses in stream networks: do watercourse and overland distances produce different results? Freshw Biol 56:1184–1192
Lappalainen J, Malinen T (2002) Effects of area and location on pikeperch yields in Finnish lakes. In: Cowx IG (ed) Management and ecology of lake and river fisheries. Blackwell, UK, pp 35–45
Legendre P, De Cáceres M (2013) Beta diversity as the variance of community data: dissimilarity coefficients and partitioning. Ecol Lett 16:951–963
Legendre P, Gallagher ED (2001) Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129:271–280
Legendre P, Legendre L (2012) Numerical ecology, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Legendre P, Borcard D, Peres-Neto PR (2005) Analyzing beta diversity: partitioning the spatial variation of community composition data. Ecol Monogr 75:435–450
Leibold MA, Mikkelson GM (2002) Coherence, species turnover, and boundary clumping: elements of meta-community structure. Oikos 97:237–250
Leibold MA, Holyoak M, Mouquet N, Amarasekare P, Chase JM, Hoopes MF, Holt RD, Shurin JB, Law R, Tilman D, Loreau M, Gonzalez A (2004) The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol Lett 7:601–613
Liu J, Soininen J, Han B-P, Declerck SAJ (2013) Effects of connectivity, dispersal directionality and functional traits on the metacommunity structure of river benthic diatoms. J Biogeogr 40:2238–2248
Meynard CN, Lavergne S, Boulangeat I, Garraud L, Van Es J, Mouquet N, Thuiller W (2013) Disentangling the drivers of metacommunity structure across spatial scales. J Biogeogr 40:1560–1571
Mouquet N, Loreau M (2003) Community patterns in source-sink metacommunities. Am Nat 162:544–557
Mykrä H, Heino J, Muotka T (2007) Scale-related patterns in the spatial and environmental components of stream macroinvertebrate assemblage variation. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:149–159
Nabout JC, Siqueira T, Bini LM, Nogueira IS (2009) No evidence for environmental and spatial processes in structuring phytoplankton communities. Acta Oecol 35:720–726
Ng ISY, Carr C, Cottenie K (2009) Hierarchical zooplankton metacommunities: distinguishing between high and limiting dispersal mechanisms. Hydrobiologia 619:133–143
Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H (2013) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.0-10. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan. Accessed 20 Sept 2015
Peres-Neto PR, Legendre P, Dray S, Borcard D (2006) Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions. Ecology 87:2614–2625
Pinel-Alloul B, Niyonsenga T, Legendre P (1995) Spatial and environmental components of freshwater zooplankton structure. Écoscience 2:1–19
Pinel-Alloul B, André A, Legendre P, Cardille JA, Patalas K, Salki A (2013) Large-scale geographic patterns of diversity and community structure of pelagic crustacean zooplankton in Canadian lakes. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 22:784–795
Presley SJ, Willig MR (2010) Bat metacommunity structure on Caribbean islands and the role of endemics. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19:185–199
Presley SJ, Higgins CL, Willig MR (2010) A comprehensive framework for the evaluation of metacommunity structure. Oikos 119:908–917
Presley SJ, Cisneros LM, Patterson BD, Willig MR (2012) Vertebrate metacommunity structure along an extensive elevational gradient in the tropics: a comparison of bats, rodents and birds. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21:968–976
Rao CR (1964) The use and interpretation of principal component analysis in applied research. Sankhyā Indian J Stat Ser A 26:329–358
Ricklefs RE, Jenkins DG (2011) Biogeography and ecology: towards the integration of two disciplines. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 366:2438–2448
Shurin JB, Cottenie K, Hillebrand H (2009) Spatial autocorrelation and dispersal limitation in freshwater organisms. Oecologia 159:151–159
Smith TW, Lundholm JT (2010) Variation partitioning as a tool to distinguish between niche and neutral processes. Ecography 33:648–655
Soininen J (2014) A quantitative analysis of species sorting across organisms and ecosystems. Ecology 95:3284–3292
Soininen J, McDonald R, Hillebrand H (2007) The distance decay of similarity in ecological communities. Ecography 30:3–12
Soininen J, Heino J, Kokocinski M, Muotka T (2009) Local-regional diversity relationship varies with spatial scale in lotic diatoms. J Biogeogr 36:720–727
Soininen J, Korhonen JJ, Karhu J, Vetterli A (2011) Disentangling the spatial patterns in community composition of prokaryotic and eukaryotic lake plankton. Limnol Oceanogr 56:508–520
Souffreau C, Van der Gucht K, van Gremberghe I, Kosten S, Lacerot G, Lobão LM, de Moraes Huszar VL, Roland F, Jeppesen E, Vyverman W, De Meester L (2015) Environmental rather than spatial factors structure bacterioplankton communities in shallow lakes along a> 6000 km latitudinal gradient in South America. Environ Microbiol 17:2336–2351
Tonkin JD, Stoll S, Jähnig SC, Haase P (2015) Contrasting metacommunity structure and beta diversity in a river-floodplain system. Oikos 125:686–697
Tonkin JD, Sundermann A, Jähnig SC, Haase P (2015b) Environmental controls on river assemblages at the regional scale: an application of the elements of metacommunity structure framework. PLoS One 10:e0135450
Tuomisto H, Ruokolainen L, Ruokolainen K (2012) Modelling niche and neutral dynamics: on the ecological interpretation of variation partitioning results. Ecography 35:961–971
Valanko S, Heino J, Westerbom M, Viitasalo M, Norkko A (2015) Complex metacommunity structure for benthic invertebrates in a low diversity coastal system. Ecol Evol 5:5203–5215
Van der Gucht K, Cottenie K, Muylaert K, Vloemans N, Cousin S, Declerck S, Jeppesen E, Conde-Porcuna J-M, Degans H, Vyverman W, De Meester L (2007) The power of species sorting: local factors drive bacterial community composition over a wide range of spatial scales. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:20404–20409
Vetaas OR, Chaudhary R (1998) Scale and species-environment relationships in a central Himalayan oak forest, Nepal. Plant Ecol 134:67–76
Viana DS, Figuerola J, Schwenk K, Manca M, Hobæk A, Mjelde M, Preston CD, Gornall RJ, Croft JM, King RA, Green AJ, Santamaría L (2015) Assembly mechanisms determining high species turnover in aquatic communities over regional and continental scales. Ecography 39:281–288
Vilmi A, Karjalainen SM, Hellsten S, Heino J (2016) Bioassessment in a metacommunity context: are diatom communities structured solely by species sorting? Ecol Ind 62:86–94
Vyverman W, Verleyen E, Sabbe K, Vanhoutte K, Sterken M, Hodgson DA, Mann DG, Juggins S, Van de Vijver B, Jones V, Flower R, Roberts D, Chepurnov VA, Kilroy C, Vanormelingen P, De Wever A (2007) Historical processes constrain patterns in global diatom diversity. Ecology 88:1924–1931
Wiens JJ (2012) Why biogeography matters: historical biogeography versus phylogeography and community phylogenetics for inferring evolutionary and ecological processes. Front Biogeogr 4:128–135
Winegardner AK, Jones BK, Ng ISY, Siqueira T, Cottenie K (2012) The terminology of metacommunity ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 27:253–254
Acknowledgments
Financial support was provided by the Academy of Finland (to JH and JS). We thank Tad Dallas, Jamie Kneitel and an anonymous reviewer for comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. We also thank all the persons involved in the field surveys and laboratory analyses of the data used in this paper.
Author contribution statement
JH, JS, JA, JL and RV devised the study ideas and provided data. JH analysed the data and led the writing; other authors provided editorial advice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Joel Trexler.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heino, J., Soininen, J., Alahuhta, J. et al. Metacommunity ecology meets biogeography: effects of geographical region, spatial dynamics and environmental filtering on community structure in aquatic organisms. Oecologia 183, 121–137 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-016-3750-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-016-3750-y