Skip to main content
Log in

Metacommunity ecology meets biogeography: effects of geographical region, spatial dynamics and environmental filtering on community structure in aquatic organisms

  • Community ecology – original research
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Metacommunity patterns and underlying processes in aquatic organisms have typically been studied within a drainage basin. We examined variation in the composition of six freshwater organismal groups across various drainage basins in Finland. We first modelled spatial structures within each drainage basin using Moran eigenvector maps. Second, we partitioned variation in community structure among three groups of predictors using constrained ordination: (1) local environmental variables, (2) spatial variables, and (3) dummy variable drainage basin identity. Third, we examined turnover and nestedness components of multiple-site beta diversity, and tested the best fit patterns of our datasets using the “elements of metacommunity structure” analysis. Our results showed that basin identity and local environmental variables were significant predictors of community structure, whereas within-basin spatial effects were typically negligible. In half of the organismal groups (diatoms, bryophytes, zooplankton), basin identity was a slightly better predictor of community structure than local environmental variables, whereas the opposite was true for the remaining three organismal groups (insects, macrophytes, fish). Both pure basin and local environmental fractions were, however, significant after accounting for the effects of the other predictor variable sets. All organismal groups exhibited high levels of beta diversity, which was mostly attributable to the turnover component. Our results showed consistent Clementsian-type metacommunity structures, suggesting that subgroups of species responded similarly to environmental factors or drainage basin limits. We conclude that aquatic communities across large scales are mostly determined by environmental and basin effects, which leads to high beta diversity and prevalence of Clementsian community types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alahuhta J, Heino J (2013) Spatial extent, regional specificity and metacommunity structuring in lake macrophytes. J Biogeogr 40:1572–1582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alahuhta J, Kanninen A, Vuori KM (2012) Response of macrophyte communities and status metrics to natural gradients and land use in boreal lakes. Aquat Bot 103:106–114

  • Alahuhta J, Rääpysjärvi J, Hellsten S, Kuoppala M, Aroviita J (2015) Species sorting drives variation of boreal lake and river macrophyte communities. Community Ecol 16:76–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alahuhta J, Hellsten S, Kuoppala M, Riihimäki J (2016) Regional and local determinants of macrophyte community compositions in high-latitude lakes of Finland. Hydrobiologia. doi:10.1007/s10750-016-2843-2

  • Anderson MJ, Crist TO, Chase JM, Vellend M, Inouye BD, Freestone AL, Sanders N, Cornell HV, Comita LS, Davies KF, Harrison SP, Kraft NJB, Stegen JC, Swenson NG (2011) Navigating the multiple meanings of β diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecol Lett 14:19–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baselga A (2010) Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19:134–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck J, Ballesteros-Mejia L, Buchmann CM, Dengler J, Fritz SA, Gruber B, Hof C, Jansen F, Knapp S, Kreft H, Schneider A-K, Winter M, Dormann CF (2012) What’s on the horizon for macroecology? Ecography 35:673–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beisner BE, Peres-Neto PR, Lindström E, Barnett A, Longhi ML (2006) The role of dispersal in structuring lake communities from bacteria to fish. Ecology 87:2895–2991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bini LM, Landeiro VL, Padial AA, Siqueira T, Heino J (2014) Nutrient enrichment is related to two facets of beta diversity for stream invertebrates across the United States. Ecology 95:1569–1578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchet FG, Legendre P, Borcard D (2008) Forward selection of explanatory variables. Ecology 89:2623–2632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonada N, Dolédec S, Statzner B (2012) Spatial autocorrelation patterns of stream invertebrates: exogenous and endogenous factors. J Biogeogr 39:56–68

  • Borcard D, Legendre P (2002) All-scale spatial analysis of ecological data by means of principal coordinates of neighbour matrices. Ecol Model 153:51–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borcard D, Legendre P, Drapeau P (1992) Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73:1045–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borcard D, Gillet F, Legendre P (2011) Numerical Ecology with R. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clements FE (1936) Nature and structure of the climax. J Ecol 24:252–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottenie K (2005) Integrating environmental and spatial processes in ecological community dynamics. Ecol Lett 8:1175–1182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cottenie K, Nuytten N, Michels E, De Meester L (2003) Zooplankton metacommunity structure: regional versus local biotic and abiotic processes in a set of interconnected ponds. Ecology 84:991–1000

  • da Silva PG, Hernández MIM (2015) Scale-dependence of processes structuring dung beetle metacommunities using functional diversity and community deconstruction approaches. PLoS One 10:e0123030

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dallas T (2013) Metacom: analysis of the “elements of metacommunity structure”. R package version 1.2. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=metacom. Accessed 20 Sept 2015

  • Dallas T, Drake JM (2014) Relative importance of environmental, geographic, and spatial variables on zooplankton metacommunities. Ecosphere 5:art104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bie T, De Meester L, Brendonck L, Martens K, Goddeeris B, Ercken D, Hampel H, Denys L, Vanhecke L, Van der Gucht K, Van Wichelen J, Vyverman W, Declerck SAJ (2012) Body size and dispersal mode as key traits determining metacommunity structure of aquatic organisms. Ecol Lett 15:740–747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Declerck SAJ, Coronel JS, Legendre P, Brendonck L (2011) Scale dependency of processes structuring metacommunities of cladocerans in temporary pools of High-Andes wetlands. Ecography 34:296–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dray S, Pélissier R, Couteron P, Fortin MJ, Legendre P, Peres-Neto PR, Bellier E, Bivand R, Blanchet FG, De Cáceres M, Dufour AB, Heegaard E, Jombart T, Munoz F, Oksanen J, Thioulouse J, Wagner HH (2012) Community ecology in the age of multivariate multiscale spatial analysis. Ecol Monogr 82:257–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gascón, S, Cañedo-Argüelles M, Nebra A, Ruhí A, Rieradevall M, Caiola N, Sala J, Ibàñez C, Quintana XD, Boix D (2016) Environmental filtering determines metacommunity structure in wetland microcrustaceans. Oecologia 181:193–205

  • Gauch HG (1982) Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert B, Bennett JR (2010) Partitioning variation in ecological communities: do the numbers add up? J Appl Ecol 47:1071–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonçalves-Souza T, Romero GQ, Cottenie K (2014) Metacommunity versus biogeography: a case study of two groups of neotropical vegetation-dwelling arthropods. PLoS One 9:e115137

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Göthe E, Angeler DG, Sandin L (2013) Metacommunity structure in a small boreal stream network. J Anim Ecol 82:449–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos M, Heino J, Siqueira T, Landeiro VL, Kotanen J, Bini LM (2013) Metacommunity structuring in stream networks: roles of dispersal mode, distance type and regional environmental context. Ecol Evol 3:4473–4487

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins BA, Porter EE (2003) Water–energy balance and the geographic pattern of species richness of western Palearctic butterflies. Ecol Entomol 28:678–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heino J (2011) A macroecological perspective of diversity patterns in the freshwater realm. Freshw Biol 56:1703–1722

  • Heino J (2013) Does dispersal ability affect the relative importance of environmental control and spatial structuring of littoral macroinvertebrate communities? Oecologia 171:971–980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heino J, Alahuhta J (2015) Elements of regional beetle faunas: faunal variation and compositional breakpoints along climate, land cover and geographical gradients. J Anim Ecol 84:427–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heino J, Muotka T, Paavola R (2003) Determinants of macroinvertebrate diversity in headwater streams: regional and local influences. J Anim Ecol 72:425–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heino J, Grönroos M, Soininen J, Virtanen R, Muotka T (2012) Context dependency and metacommunity structuring in boreal headwater streams. Oikos 121:537–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heino J, Melo AS, Bini LM, Altermatt F, Al-Shami SA, Angeler D, Bonada N, Brand C, Callisto M, Cottenie K, Dangles O, Dudgeon D, Encalada A, Göthe E, Grönroos M, Hamada N, Jacobsen D, Landeiro VL, Ligeiro R, Martins RT, Miserendino ML, Md Rawi CS, Rodrigues M, Roque FO, Sandin L, Schmera D, Sgarbi LF, Simaika J, Siqueira T, Thompson RM, Townsend CR (2015a) A comparative analysis reveals weak relationships between ecological factors and beta diversity of stream insect metacommunities at two spatial levels. Ecol Evol 5:1235–1248

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Heino J, Melo AS, Siqueira T, Soininen J, Valanko S, Bini LM (2015b) Metacommunity organisation, spatial extent and dispersal in aquatic systems: patterns, processes and prospects. Freshw Biol 60:845–869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heino J, Nokela T, Soininen J, Tolkkinen M, Virtanen L, Virtanen R (2015c) Elements of metacommunity structure and community-environment relationships in stream organisms. Freshw Biol 60:973–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heino J, Soininen J, Alahuhta J, Lappalainen J, Virtanen R (2015d) A comparative analysis of metacommunity types in the freshwater realm. Ecol Evol 5:1525–1537

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Heino J, Nokela T, Soininen J, Tolkkinen M, Virtanen L, Virtanen R (2015e) Elements of metacommunity structure and community-environment relationships in stream organisms. Freshw Biol 60:973–988

  • Hoeinghaus DJ, Winemiller KO, Birnbaum JS (2007) Local and regional determinants of stream fish assemblage structure: inferences based on taxonomic vs. functional groups. J Biogeogr 34:324–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hortal J, Diniz-Filho JAF, Bini LM, Rodríguez MÁ, Baselga A, Nogués-Bravo D, Rangel TF, Hawkins BA, Lobo JM (2011) Ice age climate, evolutionary constraints and diversity patterns of European dung beetles. Ecol Lett 14:741–748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins DG, Ricklefs RE (2011) Biogeography and ecology: two views of one world. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 366:2331–2335

    Google Scholar 

  • Jocque M, Field R, Brendonck L, de Meester L (2010) Climatic control of dispersal—ecological specialization trade-offs: a metacommunity process at the heart of the latitudinal diversity gradient? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19:244–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristiansen J (1996) Dispersal by freshwater algae—a review. Hydrobiologia 336:151–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landeiro VL, Bini LM, Melo AS, Pes AMO, Magnusson WE (2012) The roles of dispersal limitation and environmental conditions in controlling caddisfly (Trichoptera) assemblages. Freshw Biol 57:1554–1564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landeiro VL, Magnusson WE, Melo AS, Espirito-Santo HMV, Bini LM (2011) Spatial eigenfunction analyses in stream networks: do watercourse and overland distances produce different results? Freshw Biol 56:1184–1192

  • Lappalainen J, Malinen T (2002) Effects of area and location on pikeperch yields in Finnish lakes. In: Cowx IG (ed) Management and ecology of lake and river fisheries. Blackwell, UK, pp 35–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, De Cáceres M (2013) Beta diversity as the variance of community data: dissimilarity coefficients and partitioning. Ecol Lett 16:951–963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Gallagher ED (2001) Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129:271–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Legendre L (2012) Numerical ecology, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Borcard D, Peres-Neto PR (2005) Analyzing beta diversity: partitioning the spatial variation of community composition data. Ecol Monogr 75:435–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibold MA, Mikkelson GM (2002) Coherence, species turnover, and boundary clumping: elements of meta-community structure. Oikos 97:237–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibold MA, Holyoak M, Mouquet N, Amarasekare P, Chase JM, Hoopes MF, Holt RD, Shurin JB, Law R, Tilman D, Loreau M, Gonzalez A (2004) The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol Lett 7:601–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Soininen J, Han B-P, Declerck SAJ (2013) Effects of connectivity, dispersal directionality and functional traits on the metacommunity structure of river benthic diatoms. J Biogeogr 40:2238–2248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meynard CN, Lavergne S, Boulangeat I, Garraud L, Van Es J, Mouquet N, Thuiller W (2013) Disentangling the drivers of metacommunity structure across spatial scales. J Biogeogr 40:1560–1571

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mouquet N, Loreau M (2003) Community patterns in source-sink metacommunities. Am Nat 162:544–557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mykrä H, Heino J, Muotka T (2007) Scale-related patterns in the spatial and environmental components of stream macroinvertebrate assemblage variation. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:149–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabout JC, Siqueira T, Bini LM, Nogueira IS (2009) No evidence for environmental and spatial processes in structuring phytoplankton communities. Acta Oecol 35:720–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng ISY, Carr C, Cottenie K (2009) Hierarchical zooplankton metacommunities: distinguishing between high and limiting dispersal mechanisms. Hydrobiologia 619:133–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H (2013) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.0-10. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan. Accessed 20 Sept 2015

  • Peres-Neto PR, Legendre P, Dray S, Borcard D (2006) Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions. Ecology 87:2614–2625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pinel-Alloul B, Niyonsenga T, Legendre P (1995) Spatial and environmental components of freshwater zooplankton structure. Écoscience 2:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinel-Alloul B, André A, Legendre P, Cardille JA, Patalas K, Salki A (2013) Large-scale geographic patterns of diversity and community structure of pelagic crustacean zooplankton in Canadian lakes. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 22:784–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presley SJ, Willig MR (2010) Bat metacommunity structure on Caribbean islands and the role of endemics. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19:185–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presley SJ, Higgins CL, Willig MR (2010) A comprehensive framework for the evaluation of metacommunity structure. Oikos 119:908–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presley SJ, Cisneros LM, Patterson BD, Willig MR (2012) Vertebrate metacommunity structure along an extensive elevational gradient in the tropics: a comparison of bats, rodents and birds. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21:968–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao CR (1964) The use and interpretation of principal component analysis in applied research. Sankhyā Indian J Stat Ser A 26:329–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs RE, Jenkins DG (2011) Biogeography and ecology: towards the integration of two disciplines. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 366:2438–2448

    Google Scholar 

  • Shurin JB, Cottenie K, Hillebrand H (2009) Spatial autocorrelation and dispersal limitation in freshwater organisms. Oecologia 159:151–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith TW, Lundholm JT (2010) Variation partitioning as a tool to distinguish between niche and neutral processes. Ecography 33:648–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soininen J (2014) A quantitative analysis of species sorting across organisms and ecosystems. Ecology 95:3284–3292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soininen J, McDonald R, Hillebrand H (2007) The distance decay of similarity in ecological communities. Ecography 30:3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soininen J, Heino J, Kokocinski M, Muotka T (2009) Local-regional diversity relationship varies with spatial scale in lotic diatoms. J Biogeogr 36:720–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soininen J, Korhonen JJ, Karhu J, Vetterli A (2011) Disentangling the spatial patterns in community composition of prokaryotic and eukaryotic lake plankton. Limnol Oceanogr 56:508–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souffreau C, Van der Gucht K, van Gremberghe I, Kosten S, Lacerot G, Lobão LM, de Moraes Huszar VL, Roland F, Jeppesen E, Vyverman W, De Meester L (2015) Environmental rather than spatial factors structure bacterioplankton communities in shallow lakes along a> 6000 km latitudinal gradient in South America. Environ Microbiol 17:2336–2351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tonkin JD, Stoll S, Jähnig SC, Haase P (2015) Contrasting metacommunity structure and beta diversity in a river-floodplain system. Oikos 125:686–697

  • Tonkin JD, Sundermann A, Jähnig SC, Haase P (2015b) Environmental controls on river assemblages at the regional scale: an application of the elements of metacommunity structure framework. PLoS One 10:e0135450

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tuomisto H, Ruokolainen L, Ruokolainen K (2012) Modelling niche and neutral dynamics: on the ecological interpretation of variation partitioning results. Ecography 35:961–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valanko S, Heino J, Westerbom M, Viitasalo M, Norkko A (2015) Complex metacommunity structure for benthic invertebrates in a low diversity coastal system. Ecol Evol 5:5203–5215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Gucht K, Cottenie K, Muylaert K, Vloemans N, Cousin S, Declerck S, Jeppesen E, Conde-Porcuna J-M, Degans H, Vyverman W, De Meester L (2007) The power of species sorting: local factors drive bacterial community composition over a wide range of spatial scales. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:20404–20409

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vetaas OR, Chaudhary R (1998) Scale and species-environment relationships in a central Himalayan oak forest, Nepal. Plant Ecol 134:67–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viana DS, Figuerola J, Schwenk K, Manca M, Hobæk A, Mjelde M, Preston CD, Gornall RJ, Croft JM, King RA, Green AJ, Santamaría L (2015) Assembly mechanisms determining high species turnover in aquatic communities over regional and continental scales. Ecography 39:281–288

  • Vilmi A, Karjalainen SM, Hellsten S, Heino J (2016) Bioassessment in a metacommunity context: are diatom communities structured solely by species sorting? Ecol Ind 62:86–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vyverman W, Verleyen E, Sabbe K, Vanhoutte K, Sterken M, Hodgson DA, Mann DG, Juggins S, Van de Vijver B, Jones V, Flower R, Roberts D, Chepurnov VA, Kilroy C, Vanormelingen P, De Wever A (2007) Historical processes constrain patterns in global diatom diversity. Ecology 88:1924–1931

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JJ (2012) Why biogeography matters: historical biogeography versus phylogeography and community phylogenetics for inferring evolutionary and ecological processes. Front Biogeogr 4:128–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Winegardner AK, Jones BK, Ng ISY, Siqueira T, Cottenie K (2012) The terminology of metacommunity ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 27:253–254

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial support was provided by the Academy of Finland (to JH and JS). We thank Tad Dallas, Jamie Kneitel and an anonymous reviewer for comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. We also thank all the persons involved in the field surveys and laboratory analyses of the data used in this paper.

Author contribution statement

JH, JS, JA, JL and RV devised the study ideas and provided data. JH analysed the data and led the writing; other authors provided editorial advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jani Heino.

Additional information

Communicated by Joel Trexler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heino, J., Soininen, J., Alahuhta, J. et al. Metacommunity ecology meets biogeography: effects of geographical region, spatial dynamics and environmental filtering on community structure in aquatic organisms. Oecologia 183, 121–137 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-016-3750-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-016-3750-y

Keywords

Navigation