Skip to main content
Log in

Patch edges and insect populations

  • Plant-Animal Interactions - Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Responses of insect populations may be related to patch size and patch edge responses, but it is not clear how to identify these rapidly. We used a random-walk model to identify three qualitative responses to edges: no edge effect (the null model), reflecting edges and absorbing edges. Interestingly, no edge effect meant that abundance was lower at edges than in the center of patches, and reflecting edges have similar abundance at edges and centers. We then characterized several insect species’ response within maize plots to patch edges and patch size, using a simple, quick, qualitative experiment. Coleomegilla maculata and Trichogramma spp. were the only organisms that responded to patch size and edges as patch theory and the null edge model would predict. Ostrinia nubilalis larvae and possibly Rhopalosiphum maidis and eggs of Chrysopa spp. responded to patch size and edges as predicted by an attracting edge model. Estimation of predation rates suggested that the spatial distribution of these species might be determined by predators. Edge effects or the lack thereof relative to patch size may be rapidly determined for arthropod species, which could lead to understanding the mechanism(s) underlying these effects. This information may be useful in reaction diffusion models through a scaling-up approach to predict population structure of species among patches in a landscape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andow DA (1990) Characterization of predation on egg masses of Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner). Ann Entomol Soc Am 83:482–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Andow DA, Risch SJ (1985) Parasitism in diversified agroecosystems: phenology of Trichogramma minutum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Entomaphaga 32:255–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bach CE (1984) Plant spatial pattern and herbivore population dynamics: plant factors affecting the movement patterns of a tropical curcurbit specialist (Acalymma innubum). Ecology 65:175–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackshaw RP, Arcy-Burt SD (1997) Spatial distribution of bibionid larvae in agricultural grassland. Entomol Exp Appl 84:17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braschler B, Baur B (2003) Effects of experimental small-scale grassland fragmentation on spatial distribution, density, and persistence of ant nests. Ecol Entomol 28:651–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantrell RS, Cossner C (1993) Should a park be an island? SIAM J Appl Math 53:219–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer LE, Landis DA (1997) Influence of noncrop habitats on the distribution of Eriborus terebrans (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) in cornfields. Environ Entomol 26:924–932

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagan WF, Cantrell RS, Cosner C (1999) How habitat edges change species interactions. Am Nat 153:165–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman RT, Godron M (1981) Patches and structural components for a landscape ecology. Bioscience 31:733–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser H (1983) Small scale spatial heterogeneity influences predation success in an unexpected way: model experiments on the functional response of predatory mites (Arcina). Oecologia 56:249–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva PM (1983) Influence of vegetation texture on herbivore populations: resource concentration and herbivore movement. In: Denno RF, McClure MS (eds) Variable plants and herbivores in natural and managed systems. Academic Press, New York, pp 259–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva PM (1985) Finding and losing host plants by Phyllotreta: patch size and surrounding habitat. Ecology 66:1809–1816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva PM (1987) Habitat fragmentation and the stability of predator–prey interactions. Nature 326:388–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva PM, Perry R (1989) Leaf overlap and the ability of ladybird beetles to search among plants. Ecol Entomol 14:127–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magura T (2002) Carabids and forest edge: spatial pattern and edge effect. For Ecol Manag 157:23–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marino PC, Landis DA (1996) Effect of landscape structure on parasitoid diversity in agroecosystems. Ecol Appl 6:276–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melbourne BA, Chesson P (2005) Scaling up population dynamics: integrating theory and data. Oecologia 145:179–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moon DC, Stiling P (2003) The influence of legacy effects and recovery from perturbations in a tritrophic salt marsh complex. Ecol Entomol 28:457–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okubo A (1984) Critical patch size for plankton and patchiness. In: Levin SA, Hallam TG (eds) Mathematical ecology. Springer, Berlin, pp 456–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Régniére J, Rabb RL, Stinner RE (1983) Popillia japonica (Coleoptera: Scarabidae): distribution and movement of adults in heterogeneous environments. Can Entomol 115:287–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ries L, Sisk TD (2004) A predictive model of edge effects. Ecology 85:2917–2926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risser PG (1987) Landscape ecology: state of the art. In: Turner MG (ed) Landscape heterogeneity and disturbance. Springer, New York, pp 3–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Roschewitz I, Gabriel D, Tscharntke T, Theis C (2005) The effects of landscape complexity on arable weed species diversity in organic and conventional farming. J Appl Ecol 42:873–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenheim JA (1998) Higher-order predators and the regulation of insect herbivore populations. Annu Rev Entomol 43:421–427

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc (1998) SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 6, 4th edn, vol 1, 2. Cary, NC

  • Schellhorn NA, Andow DA (1999) Mortality of coccinellid (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) larvae and pupae when prey become scarce. Environ Entomol 28:1092–1100

    Google Scholar 

  • Schellhorn NA, Andow DA (2005) Response of coccinellids to their prey at different spatial scales. Popul Ecol 47:71–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt MH, Roschewitz I, Theis C, Tscharntke T (2005) Differential effects of landscape and management on diversity of ground-dwelling farmland spiders. J Appl Ecol 42:281–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweiger O, Maelfait JP, van Wingerden W, Hendricks F, Billeter R, Speelmans M, Augenstein I, Aukema B, Aviron S, Bailey D, Bukacek R, Burel F, Diekötter T, Dirksen J, Frenzel M, Herzog F, Liira J, Roubalova M, Bugter R (2005) Quantifying the impact of environmental factors on arthropod communities in agricultural landscapes across organizational levels and spatial scales. J Appl Ecol 42:1129–1139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shigesada N, Kawasaki K (1997) Travelling waves in heterogeneous environments. In: Biological invasions: theory and practice. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 61–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobodkin LB (1961) Growth and regulation of animal populations. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson B, Lagerlof J, Svensson BG (2000) Habitat preferences of nest-seeking bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in an agricultural landscape. Agric Ecosyst Environ 77:247–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winder L, Perry JN, Holland JM (1999) The spatial and temporal distribution of the grain aphid Sitobion avenae in winter wheat. Entomol Exp Appl 93:277–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank N. Shigesada for very helpful discussions on the various reaction–diffusion models, and N. Schellhorn and two anonymous reviewers for comments on the manuscript. The experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Olson.

Additional information

Communicated by Katherine Gross.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM (DOC 71 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Olson, D., Andow, D. Patch edges and insect populations. Oecologia 155, 549–558 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0933-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0933-6

Keywords

Navigation