Skip to main content
Log in

Egg intensity and freeze-thawing of fecal samples affect sensitivity of Echinococcus multilocularis detection by PCR

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Parasitology Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Echinococcus multilocularis is one of the most relevant zoonotic parasites with about 18,000 human cases per year. Its detection in wild host is crucial for disease prevention. The present study aimed to determine factors affecting the sensitivity of E. multilocularis detection by PCR using DNA extracted from fecal samples of coyotes (Canis latrans). Fecal samples were screened for the presence of Taeniidae eggs through centrifugation and sedimentation. DNA was extracted from fecal samples with and without prior freeze-thawing of the sample and then subjected to PCR targeting a mitochondrial gene (nad1) and a multi-loci microsatellite marker (EmsB). The presence of PCR inhibitors was determined through internal amplification control. Subjecting the sample to repeated freeze-thaw cycles significantly increased the sensitivity of the PCR by 20 %. Likewise, egg intensity had a significant effect on PCR, an effect which was more pronounced for samples not subjected to freeze-thawing. Two or more eggs per gram of feces significantly increased the odds for a positive PCR outcome. The presence of PCR inhibitors had no effect on PCR in samples subjected to freeze-thaw cycles, whereas in samples not subjected to freeze-thaw cycles, the presence of PCR inhibitors was associated with a 0.78 lower odds ratio of positive PCR outcome. Targeting a nuclear versus a mitochondrial gene did not have a significant effect on the sensitivity of PCR. We recommend freeze-thawing samples prior to DNA extraction to become a standard procedure for E. multilocularis detection in canid feces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Soud WA, Radstrom P (2001) Purification and characterization of PCR-inhibitory components in blood cells. J Clin Microbiol 39(2):485–493. doi:10.1128/JCM.39.2.485-493.2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bart JM et al (2006) EmsB, a tandem repeated multi-loci microsatellite, new tool to investigate the genetic diversity of Echinococcus multilocularis. Infect, Gen Evol: J Mol Epidemiol Evol Gen Infect Dis 6(5):390–400. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2006.01.006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beiromvand M et al (2011) Detection of Echinococcus multilocularis in carnivores in Razavi Khorasan province, Iran using mitochondrial DNA. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5(11):e1379. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Craig PS, Rogan MT, Allan JC (1996) Detection, screening and community epidemiology of taeniid cestode zoonoses: cystic echinococcosis, alveolar echinococcosis and neurocysticercosis. Adv Parasitol 38:169–250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson RK, Oines O, Madslien K, Mathis A (2009) Echinococcus multilocularis—adaptation of a worm egg isolation procedure coupled with a multiplex PCR assay to carry out large-scale screening of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in Norway. Parasitol Res 104(3):509–514. doi:10.1007/s00436-008-1222-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deer DM, Lampel KA, Gonzalez-Escalona N (2010) A versatile internal control for use as DNA in real-time PCR and as RNA in real-time reverse transcription PCR assays. Lett Appl Microbiol 50(4):366–372. doi:10.1111/j.1472-765X.2010.02804.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dinkel A, von Nickisch-Rosenegk M, Bilger B, Merli M, Lucius R, Romig T (1998) Detection of Echinococcus multilocularis in the definitive host: coprodiagnosis by PCR as an alternative to necropsy. J Clin Microbiol 36(7):1871–1876

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert J, Gemmell MA, Meslin F-X, Pawłowski ZS (2001) WHO/OIE manual on echinococcosis in humans and animals: a public health problem of global concern. World Organisation for Animal Health, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Good P (2000) Permutation tests: a practical guide to resampling methods for testing hypotheses, 2nd edn. Springer Verlag, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX (2013) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Karamon J (2014) Detection of Echinococcus multilocularis in faeces by nested PCR with the use of diluted DNA samples. Pol J Vet Sci 17(1):79–83

  • Jones A, Pybus MJ (2008) Taeniasis and echinococcosis. In: Samuel WM, Pybus MJ, Kocan AA (eds) Parasitic diseases of wild mammals (Second Edition). Iowa State University Press, p 150-192

  • Liccioli S, Kutz SJ, Ruckstuhl KE, Massolo A (2014) Spatial heterogeneity and temporal variations in Echinococcus multilocularis infections in wild hosts in a North American urban setting. Int J Parasitol 44(7):457–465

  • Mehta CR, Patel NR (1996) SPSS Exact Tests 7.0 for Windows®. SPSS Inc, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro L et al (1997) Complex polysaccharides as PCR inhibitors in feces: Helicobacter pylori model. J Clin Microbiol 35(4):995–998

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka N, Tsukada H, Abe N, Oku Y, Kamiya M (1998) Monitoring of Echinococcus multilocularis infection in red foxes in Shiretoko, Japan, by coproantigen detection. Parasitology 117(Pt 2):193–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oikarinen S et al (2009) PCR inhibition in stool samples in relation to age of infants. J Clin Virol: Off Publ Pan Am Soc Clin Virol 44(3):211–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raoul F, Deplazes P, Rieffel D, Lambert J-C, Giraudoux P (2010) Predator dietary response to prey density variation and consequences for cestode transmission. Oecologia (Berlin) 164(1):129–139. doi:10.1007/s00442-010-1647-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruecker NJ, Bounsombath N, Wallis P, Ong CSL, Isaac-Renton JL, Neumann NF (2005) Molecular forensic profiling of Cryptosporidium species and genotypes in raw water. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(12):8991–8994. doi:10.1124/aem.71.12.8991-8994.2005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Trachsel D, Deplazes P, Mathis A (2007) Identification of taeniid eggs in the faeces from carnivores based on multiplex PCR using targets in mitochondrial DNA. Parasitology 134(Part 6):911–920. doi:10.1017/s0031182007002235

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waits LP, Paetkau D (2005) Noninvasive genetic sampling tools for wildlife biologists: a review of applications and recommendations for accurate data collection. J Wildl Manag 69(4):1419–1433

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs. N Neuman and G. Banting for their support with the plasmid construct. We thank all the undergraduate students that participated in our study for their passion and commitment.

Canadian Council of Health Research CIHR (funding reference, 201011GIR-239508-IRG-CBBA-51314 dt 24/06/2011), Institute for Public Health of the Alberta Health, and Alberta Innovates Health Solutions (AIHS) contributed to operational funding. Student salary was covered by studentships of the University of Calgary, Department of Ecosystem & Public Health (Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary), andAlberta Innovates Health Solutions, The City of Calgary Parks covered part of the operational costs and provided in-kind contribution and logistic support.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical standards

The material presented in this paper has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere, and there is no overlap with other articles or abstracts published or in press in journals, books, or in preparation. The research has been approved by the Veterinary Science Animal Care Committee of the University of Calgary, AB, Canada (protocol number AC13-0199).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Klein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klein, C., Liccioli, S. & Massolo, A. Egg intensity and freeze-thawing of fecal samples affect sensitivity of Echinococcus multilocularis detection by PCR. Parasitol Res 113, 3867–3873 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-014-4055-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-014-4055-x

Keywords

Navigation