Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of biological and chemical insect repellents and their potential adverse effects

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Parasitology Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plant extracts, particularly plant oils, had been used and were still in use as repellents against mosquitoes. Some of them (e.g., lavender, geraniol, and citriodiol) have been notified by the European Commission as active substances to be used in repellents, which are categorized as biocides in product type 19. In the literature, it is known that these substances must be added to repellent products in high concentrations (e.g., 20 % and more) in order to reach repellent efficacy. Therefore, the question arose whether they also have repellent effects if they were added as fragrances at low concentrations of 0.25 or 1 % to registered active substances in order to obtain a better scent of this product. In the present study, the repellent effects of 0.25 and 1 % additions of 15 plant extracts (citronellol, cinerol, citral, menthol, linalyl acetate, Eucalyptus citriodora, Eucalyptus globulus, Cymbopogon nardus, lilac, sandalwood, Vitex agnus castus, rosewood, lavender, geraniol, and paramenthan diol) when exposed on skin to hungry Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. These experiments showed that there was no repellent effect in any of these compounds even when the test was done already 10 min after distributing any of the compounds onto the hands of volunteers. These experiments have proven that these 15 compounds do not produce repellent effects as long as they are used in low concentrations of 0.25 or 1 % as fragrances to ameliorate the odor of a notified repellent that is brought onto the skin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amer A, Mehlhorn H (2006a) Repellency effect of forty-one essential oils against Aedes, Anopheles and Culex mosquitoes. Parasitol Res 99:478–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amer A, Mehlhorn H (2006b) Persistency of larvadicidal effects of plant oils under different storage conditions. Parasitol Res 99:473–477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amer A, Mehlhorn H (2006c) The sensilla of Aedes and Anopheles mosquitoes and their importance in repellency. Parasitol Res 99:491–499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amer A, Mehlhorn H (2006d) Larvicidal effects of various essential oils against Aedes, Anopheles and Culex larvae (Diptera, Culicidae). Parasitol Res 99:466–472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aspöck H (ed) (2010) Arthropods as vectors of agents of diseases. Denisia 30, Landesmuseum Austria, Vienna

  • Bingen H (1170) Physica. New edition (1974). Müller Wiss Buchgesellnschaft, Salzburg (in German)

  • Büchel KH (1970) Insekten-Repellents. In: Wegler H (ed) Chemie der Pflanzenschutz- und Schädlingsbekämpfungsmittel. Springer, New York, pp 487–496

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cox FEG, Wakelin D, Despommier DD (eds) (2005) Parasitology, vol 5, Topley Wilson's microbiology and microbial infections. Hodder Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Faulde M (2001) Repellentien. In: Korting HC, Sterry W (eds) Therapeutische Verfahren in der Dermatologie. Dermatika und Kosmetika. Blackwell, Berlin, pp 727–741

    Google Scholar 

  • Frosch PJ, Johansen JD, Menne T et al (2002) Further important sensitizers in patients sensitive to fragrances. Contact Dermatitis 47:279–287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hagvall L, Karlberg AT, Christensson JB (2013) Finding the optimal patch test material and test concentration to detect contact allergy to geraniol. Contact Dermatitis 68:224–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lalko J, Api AM (2005) Investigation of the dermal sensitization potential of various essential oils in the local lymph node assay. Food Chem Toxicol 44:739–746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mehlhorn H (ed) (2008) Encyclopedia of parasitology, 3rd edn. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Nentwig G (2003) Use of repellents as prophylactic agents. Parasitol Res 90:S40–S48

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shutty B, Swender D, Chernin L et al (2013) Insect repellents and contact urticaria: different response to DEET and picaridin. Cutis 91:280–282

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trattner A, David M, Lazarov A (2009) Occupational contact dermatitis due to essential oils. Contact Dermatitis 58:282–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uter W, Schmidt E, Geier J et al (2010) Contact allergy to essential oils: current patch test results (2000–2008) from information network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK). Contact Allergy 63:277–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Uter W, Johansen JD, Börje A et al (2013) Categorization of fragrance contact allergens for prioritization of preventive measures: clinical and experimental data and consideration of structure–activity and relationships. Contact Dermatitis 69(4):196–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heinz Mehlhorn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Semmler, M., Abdel-Ghaffar, F., Schmidt, J. et al. Evaluation of biological and chemical insect repellents and their potential adverse effects. Parasitol Res 113, 185–188 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-013-3641-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-013-3641-7

Keywords

Navigation