Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Antiprotozoal activities determined in vitro and in vivo of certain plant extracts against Histomonas meleagridis, Tetratrichomonas gallinarum and Blastocystis sp.

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Parasitology Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A total of 43 plant substances provided as raw material and different kinds of extracts (aqueous, ethanol, and heptane) from 18 different organic wastes obtained from the food/feed industry were investigated for their in vitro activities against clonal cultures of Histomonas meleagridis, Tetratrichomonas gallinarum, and Blastocystis sp. Ethanolic extracts of thyme, saw palmetto, grape seed, and pumpkin fruit proved to be most efficacious. Thus, these extracts were further tested in vivo in turkeys experimentally infected with H. meleagridis by administrating the substances to the birds through the drinking water. Even though a delayed mortality was noticed in some birds medicated with the extracts of thyme, grape seed, and pumpkin fruit, all birds died or had to be euthanized the latest within 5 weeks post infection—with the exception of one bird which was probably never infected with histomonads—due to a severe typhlohepatitis indicative for histomonosis. In addition, none of the substances were able to prevent the spreading of H. meleagridis from infected to in-contact birds. Thus, these studies clearly demonstrate that in vitro studies are of limited value to assess the efficacy of plant substances against histomonosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen EA (1941) Macroscopic differentiation of lesions of histomonosis and trichomoniasis in turkeys. Am J Vet Res 2:214–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Callait MP, Granier C, Chauve C, Zenner L (2002) In vitro activity of therapeutic drugs against Histomonas meleagridis (Smith, 1895). Poult Sci 81:1122–1127

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Callait-Cardinal MP, Leroux S, Venereau E, Chauve CM, Le Pottier G, Zenner L (2007) Incidence of histomonosis in turkeys in France since the bans of dimetridazole and nifursol. Vet Rec 161:581–585

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CEC (2002) Council Regulation (EC) No 1756/2002 of 23 September 2002 amending Directive 70/524/EEC concerning additives in feedingstuffs as regards withdrawal of the authorisation of an additive and amending Commission Regulation (EC) No 2430/1999. OJEC L181:1–2

  • Duffy CF, Mathis GF, Power RF (2005a) Effects of Natustat supplementation on performance, feed efficiency and intestinal lesion scores in broiler chickens challenged with Eimeria acervulina, Eimeria maxima and Eimeria tenella. Vet Parasitol 130:185–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy CF, Sims MD, Power RF (2004) Preliminary evaluation of dietary Natustat™ versus Histostat® (Nitarsone) for control of Histomonas meleagridis in broiler chickens on infected litter. International Journal of Poultry Science 3:753–757

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy CF, Sims MD, Power RF (2005b) Evaluation of dietary Natustat for control of Histomonas meleagridis in male turkeys on infected litter. Avian Dis 49:423–425

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Friedhoff KT, Kuhnigk C, Müller I (1991) Experimental infections in chickens with Chilomastix gallinarum, Tetratrichomonas gallinarum, and Tritrichomonas eberthi. Parasitol Res 77:329–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grabensteiner E, Arshad N, Hess M (2007) Differences in the in vitro susceptibility of mono-eukaryotic cultures of Histomonas meleagridis, Tetratrichomonas gallinarum and Blastocystis sp. to natural organic compounds. Parasitol Res 101:193–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hafez HM, Hauck R (2006) Efficacy of a herbal product against Histomonas meleagridis after experimental infection of turkey poults. Archives of Animal Nutrition 60:436–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hauck R, Hafez HM (2007) Effect of coated plant extracts on Histomonas meleagridis and growth of bacteria in vitro. Avian Dis 51:880–883

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hess M, Grabensteiner E, Liebhart D (2006a) Rapid transmission of the protozoan parasite Histomonas meleagridis in turkeys and specific pathogen free chickens following cloacal infection with a mono-eukaryotic culture. Avian Pathol 35:280–285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hess M, Kolbe T, Grabensteiner E, Prosl H (2006b) Clonal cultures of Histomonas meleagridis, Tetratrichomonas gallinarum and a Blastocystis sp. established through micromanipulation. Parasitology 133:547–554

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hu J, McDougald LR (2004) The efficacy of some drugs with known antiprotozoal activity against Histomonas meleagridis in chickens. Vet Parasitol 121:233–238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp RL, Reid WM (1964) Pathogenicity studies on Trichomonas gallinarum in domestic poultry. Poult Sci 44:215–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee DL (1970) The fine structure of Blastocystis from the caecum of turkey. Trans Br Mycol Soc 54:313–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee DL (1972) Changes in the ultrastructure of the caecum of chickens caused by Trichomonas gallinarum. Parasitology 65:71–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liebhart D, Grabensteiner E, Hess M (2008) A virulent mono-eukaryotic culture of Histomonas meleagridis is capable of inducing fatal histomonosis in different aged turkeys of both sexes, regardless of the infective dose. Avian Dis 52:168–172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lund EE (1955) The progress of histomonosis (blackhead) in turkeys as related to the size of the infective dose. Poult Sci 30:127–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Mielewczik M, Mehlhorn H, Al-Quraishy S, Grabensteiner E, Hess M (2008) Transmission electron microscopic studies of stages of Histomonas meleagridis from clonal cultures. Parasitol Res 103:745–750

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Munoz E, Castella J, Gutierrez JF (1998) In vivo and in vitro sensitivity of Trichomonas gallinae to some nitroimidazole drugs. Vet Parasitol 78:239–246

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Norton RA (1997) Pathogenicity of a strain of Trichomonas gallinarum in turkeys and its possible interaction with cecal coccidia. Avian Dis 41:670–675

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sawangjaroen N, Sawangjaroen K (2005) The effects of extracts from anti-diarrheic Thai medicinal plants on the in vitro growth of the intestinal protozoa parasite: Blastocystis hominis. J Ethnopharmacol 98:67–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stenzel DJ, Boreham PF (1996) Blastocystis hominis revisited. Clin Microbiol Rev 9:563–584

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tyzzer EE (1920) The flagellate character and reclassification of the parasite producing “blackhead” in turkeys—Histomonas (gen.nov.) meleagridis (Smith). J Parasitol 6:124–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Heijden HM, Landman WJ (2008a) In vivo effect of herbal products against Histomonas meleagridis in turkeys. Avian Pathol 37:45–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van der Heijden HM, Landman WJ (2008b) In vitro effect of herbal products against Histomonas meleagridis. Vet Parasitol 154:1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yang LQ, Singh M, Yap EH, Ng GC, Xu HX, Sim KY (1996) In vitro response of Blastocystis hominis against traditional Chinese medicine. J Ethnopharmacol 55:35–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zenner L, Callait MP, Granier C, Chauve C (2003) In vitro effect of essential oils from Cinnamomum aromaticum, Citrus limon and Allium sativum on two intestinal flagellates of poultry, Tetratrichomonas gallinarum and Histomonas meleagridis. Parasite 10:153–157

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the EU project SAFEWASTES (Sixth Framework Programme, Priority 5, Food Quality and Safety, proposal number 513949). The authors would like to thank all collaborating partners within the abovementioned project for supplying the plant extracts. All experiments performed in the present study were discussed and approved by the institutional ethics committee and performed in agreement with the Austrian animal license number 68.205/0017-BrGT/2005.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department for Farm Animals and Veterinary Public Health, Clinic for Avian, Reptile and Fish Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210, Vienna, Austria

    Elvira Grabensteiner, Dieter Liebhart, Najma Arshad & Michael Hess

Authors
  1. Elvira Grabensteiner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dieter Liebhart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Najma Arshad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michael Hess
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Hess.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grabensteiner, E., Liebhart, D., Arshad, N. et al. Antiprotozoal activities determined in vitro and in vivo of certain plant extracts against Histomonas meleagridis, Tetratrichomonas gallinarum and Blastocystis sp.. Parasitol Res 103, 1257–1264 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-008-1122-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-008-1122-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation