Skip to main content
Log in

Reconstruction of the musculature of Magelona cf. mirabilis (Magelonidae) and Prionospio cirrifera (Spionidae) (Polychaeta, Annelida) by phalloidin labeling and cLSM

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Zoomorphology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent investigations have suggested that a lack of circular muscle fibers may be a common situation rather than a rare exception in polychaetes. As part of a comparative survey of polychaete muscle systems, the F-actin musculature subset of Magelona cf. mirabilis and Prionospio cirrifera were labeled with phalloidin and three-dimensionally analyzed and reconstructed by means of cLSM. Obvious similarities are sublongitudinal lateral, circumbuccal, palp retractor, dominating dorsal longitudinal, perpendicular lateral and ventral transverse muscles. Differences between M. cf. mirabilis and P. cirrifera are: (1) two types of prostomial muscles (transversal and longitudinal) in M. cf. mirabilis versus one type (diagonal) in P. cirrifera; (2) one type of palp muscles (longitudinal) in M. cf. mirabilis versus three types (longitudinal, diagonal, circular) in P. cirrifera; (3) five ventral longitudinal muscles (ventromedian, paramedian, ventral) in M. cf. mirabilis versus four (two paramedian, two ventral) in P. cirrifera. Ventral and lateral transverse fibers are present in the thorax, but absent in the abdomen of M. cf. mirabilis. The triangular lumen of the pharynx in M. cf. mirabilis is surrounded by radial muscle fibers; three sets of pharynx diductors attach to its dorsal side. The unique features of P. cirrifera are one pair of brain muscles and segmentally arranged dorsal transverse muscles, the latter located outside the longitudinal muscles. The transverse lateral muscles are restricted to the sides and lie beneath the longitudinal muscles, a pattern described here for the first time. A true, outer layer of circular fibers is absent in both species of Spionida that were investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Clark WB (1964) Dynamics in metazoan evolution. The origin of the coelom and segments. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark WB (1981) Locomotion and the phylogeny of the Metazoa. Boll Zool 48:11–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Dauer DM (1985) Functional morphology and feeding behavior of Paraprionospio pinnata (Polychaeta: Spionidae). Mar Biol 85:143–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dauer DM (1991) Functional morphology and feeding behavior of Polydora commensalis (Polychaeta: Spionidae). Ophelia Suppl 5:607–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Dauer DM, Ewing RM (1991) Functional morphology and feeding behavior of Malacoceros indicus (Polychaeta: Spionidae). Bull Mar Sci 48:395–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Dauer DM, Mahon HK, Sarda R (2003) Functional morphology and feeding behavior of Streblospio benedicti and S. shrubsolii (Polychaeta: Spionidae). Hydrobiologia 296:207–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fauchald K, Rouse G (1997) Polychaete systematics: present and past. Zool Scr 26:71–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner SL (1988) Respiratory and feeding appendages. In: Westheide W, Hermans CO (eds) The ultrastructure of polychaeta. Microfauna Marina, vol 4. Fisher, Stuttgart, pp 37–43

  • Gardiner S (1992) General organization, integument, musclulature, coelom and vascular system. In: Harrison FW (ed) Microscopic anatomy of invertebrates, vol 7. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 19–52

  • Gardiner SL, Rieger RM (1980) Rudimentary cilia in muscle cells of annelids and echinoderms. Cell Tissue Res 213:247–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans CO (1969) The systematic position of the Archiannelida. Syst Zool 18:85–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov IE, Tzelin AB (1997) Fine structure of the trunk in the polychaete family Phyllodocidae (Annelida, Polychaeta) a functional morphological analysis (in Russia). Dok Akad NAUK 354:272–277b

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanzavecchia G, de Eguileor M, Valvassori R (1988) Muscles. In: Westheide W, Hermans CO (eds) The ultrastructure of polychaeta. Microfauna Marina, vol 4. Fischer, Stuttgart, pp 71–88

  • McHugh D (1997) Molecular evidence that echiurand and pogonophorans are derived annelids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:8006–8009

    Google Scholar 

  • Mettam C (1967) Segmental musculature and parapodial movement of Nereis diversicolor and Nephthys hombergi (Annelida: Polychaeta). J Zool (Lond) 153:245–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Mettam C (1971) Functional design and evolution of the polychaete Aphrodite aculeata. J Zool (Lond) 163:489–519

    Google Scholar 

  • Möllers S, Müller MCM (2001) Development of the muscle system in Myzostoma cirriferum (Annelida, Myzostomida). Zoology 94(1):41

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller MC (1999) Das Nervensystem der Polychaeten: Immunhistochemische Untersuchungen an ausgewählten Taxa. PhD Thesis, Universität Osnabrück

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller MCM, Schmidt-Rhaesa A (2002) Reconstruction of the muscle system in Antygomonas sp. (Kinorhyncha, Cyclorhagida) by phalloidin labelling and cLSM. J Morphol 256:103–110. DOI 10.1002/jmor.10058

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller MCM, Sterrer W (2004) Musculature and nervous system of Gnathostomula peregrina (Gnathostomulida) shown by phalloidin labeling, immunohistochemistry, and cLSM, and their phylogenetic significance. Zoomorphology 123:169–177. DOI 10.1007/s00435-004-0099-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller MCM, Jochmann R, Schmidt-Rhaesa A (2004) The musculature of horsehair worms (Gordius aquaticus, Paragordius varius, Nematomorpha): F-actin staining and reconstruction by cLSM and TEM. Zoomorphology 123:45–54. DOI 10.1007/s00435-003-0088-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orrhage L (1964) Anatomische und morphologische Studien über die Polychaetenfamilien Spionidae, Disomidae und Poecilochaetidae. Zool Bidr Uppsala 36:386–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilato G (1981) The significance of musculature in the origin of the Annelida. Boll Zool 48:209–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Purschke G (1993) Structure of the prostomial appendages and the central nervous system in the Protodrilida (Polychaeta). Zoomorphology 113:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purschke G (2002) On the ground pattern of Annelida. Org Divers Evol 2:181–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Purschke G, Tzetlin AB (1996) Dorsal ciliary folds in the polychaete foregut: structure, prevalence and phylogenetic significance. Acta Zool (Stockh) 77:33–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieger RM, Salvenmoser W, Legniti A, Tyler S (1994) Phalloidin-rhodamine preparations of Macrostomum (Plathelminthes): morphology and postembryonic development of the musculature. Zoomorphology 114:133–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouse G, Fauchald K (1997) Cladistics and polychaetes. Zool Scr 26:139–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse GW, Glasby CJ (2000) Phylogeny. In: Beesly PL, Ross GJB, Glasby CJ (eds) Polychaetes and allies: the southern synthesis. Fauna of Australia, vol 4A. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, pp 46–51

  • Rouse GW, Pleijel F (2001) Polychaetes. Oxford, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderström A (1920) Studien über die Polychätenfamilie Spinonidae. Diss. Almquist and Wiksell, Uppsala, pp 1–286

  • Storch V (1968) Zur vergleichenden Anatomie der segmentalen Muskelsysteme und zur Verwandtschaft der Polychaeten-Familien. Z Morphol Tiere 63:251–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzetlin A (1987) Structural peculiarities of Pisionidens tchesunovi (Polychaeta) and their possible significance (in Russian). Zool Zh 66:1454–1462

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzetlin AB (1992) Evolution of the feeding apparatus of the Polychaetes (Annaelida). Dr. of. Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Biology, Moscow State Univ., Moscow:1–475

  • Tzetlin AB, Filippova A (2004) Muscular system. In: Purschke G Bartolomaeus T (eds) Morphology, molecules, evolution and phylogeny in the polychaeta and related taxa. Hydrobiologia/Dev Hydrobiol

  • Tzetlin AB, Purschke G (2004) Pharynx and Intestine. In: Purschke G, Bartolomaeus T (eds) Morphology, molecules, evolution and phylogeny in the polychaeta and related taxa. Hydrobiologia/Dev Hydrobiol

  • Tzetlin AB, Dahlgren T, Purschke G (2002a) Ultrastructure of the body wall, body cavity, nephridia and spermatozoa in four species of the Chrysopetalidae (Annelida). Zool Anz 241:37–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzetlin AB, Zhadan A, Ivanov I, Müller MCM, Purschke G (2002b) On the absence of circular muscle elements in the body wall of Dysponetus pygmaeus (Chrysopetalidae, ‘Polychaeta’, Annelida). Acta Zool 83:81–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Westheide W (1997) The direction of evolution within the Polychaeta. J Nat Hist 31:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Westheide W, Waston Russel C (1992) Ultrastructure of chrysopetalid paleal chaetae (Annelida; Polychaeta). Acta Zool (Stockh) 37:197–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RS (2000) Family Magelonidae. In: Beesly PL, Ross GJB, Glasby CJ (eds) Polychaetes and allies: the southern synthesis. Fauna of Australia, vol 4A. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, pp 194–195

  • Worsaae, K (2003) Palp morphology in two species of Prionospio (Polychaeta: Spionidae). Hydrobiologia 496:259–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Prof. Dr. Wilfried Westheide for support and hospitality towards the Russian colleagues during their investigations at the University of Osnabrück. The study of A. Filippova was supported by the Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Filippova.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Filippova, A., Purschke, G., Tzetlin, A.B. et al. Reconstruction of the musculature of Magelona cf. mirabilis (Magelonidae) and Prionospio cirrifera (Spionidae) (Polychaeta, Annelida) by phalloidin labeling and cLSM. Zoomorphology 124, 1–8 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-004-0106-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-004-0106-7

Keywords

Navigation