Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Lung cancer screening with MRI: results of the first screening round

  • Original Article – Clinical Oncology
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 10 May 2018

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the suitability of MRI for lung cancer screening in a high-risk population.

Materials and methods

A 5-year lung cancer screening program comparing MRI and low-dose CT (LDCT) in a high-risk population was initiated. 224 subjects were examined with MRI and LDCT. Acquired MRI sequences were T2w MultiVane XD, balanced steady-state-free precession, 3D T1w GRE, and DWI with a maximum in-room-time of 20 min. Categorization and management of nodules were based on Lung-RADS. MRI findings were correlated with LDCT as a reference. Here, we report on the first screening round.

Results

MRI accurately detected 61 of 88 nodules 4–5 mm, 20 of 21 nodules 6–7 mm, 12 of 12 nodules 8–14 mm, 4 of 4 nodules ≥ 15 mm (solid nodules), and 8 of 11 subsolid nodules. Sensitivity/specificity of MRI for nodule detection was 69.3/96.4% for 4–5 mm, 95.2/99.6% for 6–7 mm, 100/99.6% for 8–14 mm, 100/100% for ≥ 15 mm (solid nodules), and 72.7/99.2% for subsolid nodules. The early recall rate was 13.8% for MRI and 12.5% for LDCT. Following Lung-RADS recommendations and based on interdisciplinary consensus, histology was obtained in eight subjects. The biopsy rate was 3.6% for MRI and 3.4% for LDCT. In all of these eight cases, the nodules were carcinomas, and all of them were accurately detected by MRI.

Conclusion

The results of the first screening round suggest that MRI is suitable for lung cancer screening with an excellent sensitivity and specificity for nodules ≥ 6 mm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DWI:

Diffusion-weighted imaging

LDCT:

Low-dose computed tomography

Lung-RADS:

Lung screening reporting and data system

MVXD:

MultiVane XD (Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands)

SENSE:

Sensitivity encoding (Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands)

STIR:

Short tau inversion recovery

THRIVE:

T1 high-resolution isotropic volume excitation (Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands)

UTE:

Ultrashort echo time

References

  • Alberg AJ, Brock MV, Ford JG, Samet JM, Spivack SD (2013) Epidemiology of lung cancer. Chest 143(5 suppl):e1S–e29S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Alper F, Kurt AT, Aydin Y, Ozgokce M, Akgun M (2013) The role of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of pulmonary nodules and masses. Med Princ Pract 22(1):80–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • American College of Radiology (2017) Lung CT screening reporting and data system (Lung-RADS). Available at: http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Resources/LungRADS. Accessed 31 March 2017

  • Becker N, Motsch E, Gross ML et al (2012) Randomized study on early detection of lung cancer with MSCT in Germany: study design and results of the first screening round. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 138:1475–1486

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Biederer J, Beer M, Hirsch W, Wild J, Fabel M, Puderbach M, Van Beek EJ (2012) MRI of the lung (2/3). Why … when … how? Insights Imaging 3(4):355–371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Biederer J, Ohno Y, Hatabu H, Schiebler ML, van Beek EJ, Vogel-Claussen J, Kauczor HU (2017) Screening for lung cancer: does MRI have a role? Eur J Radiol 86:353–360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bieri O (2013) Ultra-fast steady state free precession and its application to in vivo (1)H morphological and functional lung imaging at 1.5 tesla. Magn Reson Med 70(3):657–663

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner DJ (2004) Radiation risks potentially associated with low-dose CT screening of adult smokers for lung cancer. Radiology 231(2):440–445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carney PA, Sickles EA, Monsees BS et al (2010) Identifying minimally acceptable interpretive performance criteria for screening mammography. Radiology 255(2):354–361

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Zhang J, Bao J et al (2013) Meta-analysis of diffusion-weighted MRI in the differential diagnosis of lung lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 37(6):1351–1358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cieszanowski A, Lisowska A, Dabrowska M, Korczynski P, Zukowska M, Grudzinski IP, Pacho R, Rowinski O, Krenke R (2016) MR imaging of pulmonary nodules: detection rate and accuracy of size estimation in comparison to computed tomography. PLoS One 11(6):e0156272

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Deng Y, Li X, Lei Y, Liang C, Liu Z (2016) Use of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging to distinguish between lung cancer and focal inflammatory lesions: a comparison of intravoxel incoherent motion derived parameters and apparent diffusion coefficient. Acta Radiol 57(11):1310–1317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horeweg N, van Rosmalen J, Heuvelmans MA et al (2014) Lung cancer probability in patients with CT-detected pulmonary nodules: a prespecified analysis of data from the NELSON trial of low-dose CT screening. Lancet Oncol 15(12):1332–1341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howington JA, Blum MG, Chang AC, Balekian AA, Murthy SC (2013) Treatment of stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer. Chest 143(5 suppl):e278S–e313S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jett JR, Schild SE, Kesler KA, Kalemkerian GP (2013) Treatment of small cell lung cancer. Chest 143(5 suppl):e400S–e419S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kono R, Fujimoto K, Terasaki H, Müller NL, Kato S, Sadohara J, Hayabuchi N, Takamori S (2007) Dynamic MRI of solitary pulmonary nodules: comparison of enhancement patterns of malignant and benign small peripheral lung lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188(1):26–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koyama H, Ohno Y, Kono A, Takenaka D, Maniwa Y, Nishimura Y, Ohbayashi C, Sugimura K (2008) Quantitative and qualitative assessment of non-contrast-enhanced pulmonary MR imaging for management of pulmonary nodules in 161 subjects. Eur Radiol 18:2120–2131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koyama H, Ohno Y, Aoyama N, Onishi Y, Matsumoto K, Nogami M, Takenaka D, Nishio W, Ohbayashi C, Sugimura K (2010) Comparison of STIR turbo SE imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging of the lung: capability for detection and subtype classification of pulmonary adenocarcinomas. Eur Radiol 20:790–800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koyama H, Ohno Y, Seki S, Nishio M, Yoshikawa T, Matsumoto S, Sugimura K (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging for lung cancer. J Thorac Imaging 28(3):138–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lung cancer (2012) Estimated incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012. Available at http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_cancer.aspx. Accessed 31 March 2017

  • MacMahon H, Naidich DP, Goo JM et al (2017) Guidelines for management of incidental pulmonary nodules detected on CT images: from the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology 284(1):228–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams A, Tammemagi MC, Mayo JR et al (2013) Probability of cancer in pulmonary nodules detected on first screening CT. N Engl J Med 369(10):910–919

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Meier-Schroers M, Kukuk G, Homsi R, Skowasch D, Schild HH, Thomas D (2016) MRI of the lung using the PROPELLER technique: artifact reduction, better image quality and improved nodule detection. Eur J Radiol 85(4):707–713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Collaborating Centre for Cancer (UK) (2011) The diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer (Update). Cardiff (UK): National Collaborating Centre for Cancer (UK). NICE Clinical Guidelines, No. 121

  • National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, Fagerstrom RM, Gareen IF, Gatsonis C, Marcus PM, Sicks JD (2011) Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 365(5):395–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohno Y, Koyama H, Yoshikawa T, Seki S, Takenaka D, Yui M, Lu A, Miyazaki M, Sugimura K (2016) Pulmonary high-resolution ultrashort TE MR imaging: comparison with thin-section standard- and low-dose computed tomography for the assessment of pulmonary parenchyma diseases. J Magn Reson Imaging 43(2):512–532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rajaram S, Swift AJ, Capener D, Telfer A, Davies C, Hill C, Condliffe R, Elliot C, Hurdman J, Kiely DG, Wild JM (2012) Lung morphology assessment with balanced steady-state free precession MR imaging compared with CT. Radiology 263:569–577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder T, Ruehm SG, Debatin JF, Ladd ME, Barkhausen J, Goehde SC (2005) Detection of pulmonary nodules using a 2D HASTE MR sequence: comparison with MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:979–984

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer G, Tremper J, Koenigkam-Santos M, Delorme S, Becker N, Biederer J, Kauczor HU, Heussel CP, Schlemmer HP, Puderbach M (2014) Lung nodule detection in a high-risk population: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and low-dose computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 83(3):600–605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Klaveren RJ, Oudkerk M, Prokop M et al (2009) Management of lung nodules detected by volume CT scanning. N Engl J Med 361:2221–2229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wielpütz M, Kauczor HU (2012) MRI of the lung: state of the art. Diagn Interv Radiol 18(4):344–353

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wild JM, Marshall H, Bock M, Schad LR, Jakob PM, Puderbach M, Molinari F, Van Beek EJ, Biederer J (2012) MRI of the lung (1/3): methods. Insights Imaging 3(4):345–353

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to address special thanks to our study nurse Olga Ramig. This study would not have been achievable without her ambition.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Meier-Schroers.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meier-Schroers, M., Homsi, R., Skowasch, D. et al. Lung cancer screening with MRI: results of the first screening round. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 144, 117–125 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-017-2521-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-017-2521-4

Keywords

Navigation