Abstract
The present work aimed at exploring functional correlates of motor and linguistic representations of everyday actions, with a specific interest in potential sensorimotor activation effects induced by the use of related action sentences. While it is indeed known that observing simple motor acts (e.g., precision grasping) and listening to the sound of specific actions (e.g., walking) activate sensorimotor structures, less is known when we move to more complex behaviors and more abstract linguistic representations (e.g., verbal descriptions). Again, the potential of linguistic representations to facilitate the activation of specific sensorimotor structures during action execution or observation is yet unexplored. We then aimed at investigating hemodynamic activation patterns (via functional near-infrared spectroscopy, fNIRS) within the sensorimotor network during different tasks based on everyday activities. Twenty volunteers were asked to execute (EXE), observe (OBS), or listen (LIS) to brief verbal descriptions of transitive actions, to observe them while listening to their description (OBS–LIS), or to execute them while listening to their description (EXE–LIS). Analyses highlighted that, in the left hemisphere, hemodynamic responses were the lowest during observation of complex actions and observation coupled with listening, greater during simple listening to verbal description of actions, and maximal when participants actually executed complex actions or executed them while listening to their verbal descriptions. The present results suggest that processing verbal descriptions of actions might keep the sensorimotor network more active than simply observing them. Such first pieces of evidence hint at potential implications for novel procedures for rehabilitation of movement and action deficits.
References
Balconi M, Molteni E (2016) Past and future of near-infrared spectroscopy in studies of emotion and social neuroscience. J Cogn Psychol 28:129–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2015.1102919
Balconi M, Cortesi L, Crivelli D (2017a) Motor planning and performance in transitive and intransitive gesture execution and imagination: does EEG (RP) activity predict hemodynamic (fNIRS) response? Neurosci Lett 648:59–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2017.03.049
Balconi M, Crivelli D, Cortesi L (2017b) Transitive versus intransitive complex gesture representation: a comparison between execution, observation and imagination by fNIRS. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 42:179–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-017-9365-1
Binkofski F, Buccino G (2004) Motor functions of the Broca’s region. Brain Lang 89:362–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00358-4
Binkofski F, Amunts K, Stephan KM et al (2000) Broca’s region subserves imagery of motion: a combined cytoarchitectonic and fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp 11:273–285
Buccino G (2014) Action observation treatment: a novel tool in neurorehabilitation. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 369:20130185. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0185
Buccino G, Riggio L, Melli G et al (2005) Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: a combined TMS and behavioral study. Cogn Brain Res 24:355–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.02.020
Buccino G, Colagè I, Gobbi N, Bonaccorso G (2016) Grounding meaning in experience: a broad perspective on embodied language. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 69:69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.07.033
Chao LL, Martin A (2000) Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage 12:478–484
Chao LL, Weisberg J, Martin A (2002) Experience-dependent modulation of category-related cortical activity. Cereb Cortex 12:545–551
Chatrian G-E, Lettich E, Nelson PL (1988) Modified nomenclature for the “10%” electrode system. J Clin Neurophysiol 5:183–186
Chong TT-J, Williams MA, Cunnington R, Mattingley JB (2008) Selective attention modulates inferior frontal gyrus activity during action observation. Neuroimage 40:298–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.11.030
Corballis MC (2010) Mirror neurons and the evolution of language. Brain Lang 112:25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2009.02.002
Crivelli D, Balconi M (2017a) Event-related electromagnetic responses. Ref Modul Neurosci Biobehav Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.03053-4
Crivelli D, Balconi M (2017b) Near-infrared spectroscopy applied to complex systems and human hyperscanning networking. Appl Sci 7:922. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7090922
de Vignemont F, Haggard P (2008) Action observation and execution: what is shared? Soc Neurosci 3:421–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470910802045109
Dijkstra K, Post L (2015) Mechanisms of embodiment. Front Psychol 6:1525. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01525
Fischer MH, Zwaan RA (2008) Embodied language: a review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. Q J Exp Psychol 61:825–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701623605
Frey SH (2008) Tool use, communicative gesture and cerebral asymmetries in the modern human brain. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 363:1951–1957. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0008
Galati G, Committeri G, Spitoni G et al (2008) A selective representation of the meaning of actions in the auditory mirror system. Neuroimage 40:1274–1286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.044
Gentilucci M, Corballis MC (2006) From manual gesture to speech: a gradual transition. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 30:949–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.02.004
Glenberg AM, Kaschak MP (2002) Grounding language in action. Psychon Bull Rev 9:558–565
Grèzes J, Decety J (2001) Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: a meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 12:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0193(200101)12:1<1::AID-HBM10>3.0.CO;2-V
Horwitz B, Amunts K, Bhattacharyya R et al (2003) Activation of Broca’s area during the production of spoken and signed language: a combined cytoarchitectonic mapping and PET analysis. Neuropsychologia 41:1868–1876. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(03)00125-8
Koessler L, Maillard L, Benhadid A et al (2009) Automated cortical projection of EEG sensors: anatomical correlation via the international 10–10 system. Neuroimage 46:64–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.02.006
Kohler E, Keysers C, Umiltà MA et al (2002) Hearing sounds, understanding actions: action representation in mirror neurons. Science 297:846–848
Króliczak G (2013) Representations of transitive and intransitive gestures: perception and imitation. J Neurosci Neuroeng 2:195–210. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnsne.2013.1050
Króliczak G, Frey SH (2009) A common network in the left cerebral hemisphere represents planning of tool use pantomimes and familiar intransitive gestures at the hand-independent level. Cereb Cortex 19:2396–2410. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn261
Króliczak G, Piper BJ, Frey SH (2011) Atypical lateralization of language predicts cerebral asymmetries in parietal gesture representations. Neuropsychologia 49:1698–1702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.044
Luria AR (1970) Traumatic aphasia: its syndromes, psychology, and treatment. Mouton, The Hague
McNeill D (1992) Hand and mind: what gestures reveal about thought. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Meador KL, Loring DW, Lee K et al (1999) Cerebral lateralization: relationship of language and ideomotor praxis. Neurology 53:2028–2031
Mollo G, Pulvermüller F, Hauk O (2016) Movement priming of EEG/MEG brain responses for action-words characterizes the link between language and action. Cortex 74:262–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.10.021
Oliveira J, Brito R (2014) Insights into the neural mechanisms underlying hand praxis: implications for the neurocognitive rehabilitation of apraxia. Front Psychol 5:379–388. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01380
Pulvermüller F (2001) Brain reflections of words and their meaning. Trends Cogn Sci 5:517–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01803-9
Pulvermüller F (2005) Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:576–582. https://doi.org/10.1038/2201358a0
Rizzolatti G, Arbib MA (1998) Language within our grasp. Trends Neurosci 21:188–194
Rothi LJG, Ochipa C, Heilman KM (1991) A cognitive neuropsychological model of limb praxis. Cogn Neuropsychol 8:443–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643299108253382
Stamenova V, Roy EA, Black SE (2010) Associations and dissociations of transitive and intransitive gestures in left and right hemisphere stroke patients. Brain Cogn 72:483–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2010.01.004
Van Overwalle F (2009) Social cognition and the brain: a meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 30:829–858. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20547
Van Overwalle F, Baetens K (2009) Understanding others’ actions and goals by mirror and mentalizing systems: a meta-analysis. Neuroimage 48:564–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.009
Villarreal M, Fridman EA, Amengual A et al (2008) The neural substrate of gesture recognition. Neuropsychologia 46:2371–2382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.03.004
Vingerhoets G, Acke F, Alderweireldt A-S et al (2012) Cerebral lateralization of praxis in right- and left-handedness: same pattern, different strength. Hum Brain Mapp 33:763–777. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21247
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
429_2018_1646_MOESM1_ESM.tif
Group waveforms and topographical maps of task-related hemodynamic responses relative to action observation (OBS), observation and listening (OBS–LIS), listening (LIS), execution and listening (EXE–LIS), and execution (EXE) conditions. (a) O2Hb (red lines) and HHb (blue lines) waveforms (grand averages) during different experimental conditions; right channels; shaded areas represent ±1 SE from the mean. (b) Topographical activation maps for O2Hb-related measures; green-to-blue colors mark a decrease in oxygenated hemoglobin concentration; green-to-red colors mark an increase in oxygenated hemoglobin concentration (TIF 3385 KB)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Crivelli, D., Sabogal Rueda, M.D. & Balconi, M. Linguistic and motor representations of everyday complex actions: an fNIRS investigation. Brain Struct Funct 223, 2989–2997 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-018-1646-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-018-1646-9