Skip to main content
Log in

Attentional and anatomical considerations for the representation of simple stimuli in visual short-term memory: evidence from human electrophysiology

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Observers encoded the spatial arrangement of two or three horizontal line segments relative to a square frame presented for 150 ms either in left or right visual field and either above or below the horizontal midline. The target pattern was selected on the basis of colour (red vs. green) from an equivalent distractor pattern in the opposite left–right visual hemifield. After a retention interval of 450 or 650 ms a test pattern was presented at fixation. The task was to decide whether the test was the same as the encoded pattern or different. Selection of the to-be-memorised pattern produced an N2pc response that was not influenced by the number of line segments nor by the length of the retention interval, but that was smaller in amplitude for patterns presented in the upper visual field compared with patterns presented in the lower visual field. A sustained posterior contralateral negativity (SPCN) followed the N2pc. The SPCN was larger for patterns with three line segments than for two, was larger for patterns encoded from lower visual field than from upper visual field, and returned to baseline sooner for the shorter retention interval than for the longer interval. These results, and others, provide an interesting and complex pattern of similarities and differences between the N2pc and SPCN, consistent with the view that N2pc reflects mechanisms of attentional selection whereas the SPCN reflects maintenance in visual short-term memory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brisson, B., & Jolicœur, P. (2007a). Electrophysiological evidence of central interference in the control of visuospatial attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 126–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brisson, B., & Jolicœur, P. (2007b). A psychological refractory period in access to visual short-term memory and the deployment of visual-spatial attention: Multitasking processing deficits revealed by event-related potentials. Psychophysiology, 44, 323–333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dell’Acqua, R., Sessa, P., Jolicœur, P., & Robitaille, N. (2006). Spatial attention freezes during the attention blink. Psychophysiology, 43, 394–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eimer, M. (1996). The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 99, 225–234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1983). A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifacts. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55, 468–484.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • He, S., Cavanagh, P., & Intriligator, J. (1996). Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness. Nature, 383, 334–337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hillyard, S. A., & Galambos, R. (1970). Eye movement artifact in the CNV. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 28, 173–182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, C., McDonald, J., & Theeuwes, J. (2006). Electrophysiological evidence of the capture of visual attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 604–613.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jolicœur, P., Brisson, B., & Robitaille, N. (2008). Dissociation of the N2pc and sustained posterior contralateral negativity in a choice response task. Brain Research, 1215, 160–172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jolicœur, P., Sessa, P., Dell’acqua, R., & Robitaille, N. (2006a). Attentional control and capture in the attentional blink paradigm: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Psychological Research, 19, 560–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolicœur, P., Sessa, P., Dell’Acqua, R., & Robitaille, N. (2006b). On the control of visual spatial attention: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Psychological Research, 70, 414–424.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H., & Jessell, T. M. (2000). Principles of neural science (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiesel, A., Miller, J., Jolicœur, P., & Brisson, B. (2008). Measurement of ERP latency differences: A comparison of single-participant and jackknife-based scoring methods. Psychophysiology, 45, 250–274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, M., Jolicœur, P., Dell’Acqua, R., & Eimer, M. (2008). Attentional capture by visual singletons is mediated by top-down task set: New evidence from the N2pc component. Psychophysiology, 45, 1013–1024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klaver, P., Talsma, D., Wijers, A. A., Heinze, H.-J., & Mulder, G. (1999). An event-related brain potential correlate of visual short-term memory. NeuroReport, 10, 2001–2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leblanc, É., Prime, D., & Jolicœur, P. (2008). Tracking the location of visuospatial attention in a contingent capture paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 657–671.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lins, O. G., Picton, T. W., Berg, P., & Scherg, M. (1993). Ocular artifacts in EEG and event-related potentials 1: Scalp topography. Brain Topography, 6, 51–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luck, S. J. (2005). An introduction to the event-related potential technique. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luck, S. J., Girelli, M., McDermott, M. T., & Ford, M. A. (1997). Bridging the gap between monkey neurophysiology and human perception: An ambiguity resolution theory of visual selective attention. Cognitive Psychology, 33, 64–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994a). Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. Psychophysiology, 31, 291–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994b). Spatial filtering during visual search: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1000–1014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maunsell, J. H. R., & Newsome, W. T. (1987). Visual processing in monkey extrastriate cortex. Annual Reviews of Neuroscience, 10, 363–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCollough, A. W., Machizawa, M. G., & Vogel, E. K. (2007). Electrophysiological measures of maintaining representations in visual working memory. Cortex, 43, 77–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J., Paterson, T., & Ulrich, R. (1998). Jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences. Psychophysiology, 35, 99–115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robitaille, N., & Jolicœur, P. (2006). Fundamental properties of the N2pc as an index of spatial attention: Effects of masking. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 101–111.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robitaille, N., Jolicœur, P., Dell’Acqua, R., & Sessa, P. (2007). Short-term consolidation of visual patterns interferes with visuo-spatial attention: Converging evidence from human electrophysiology. Brain Research, 1185, 158–169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sereno, M. I., Dale, A. M., Reppas, J. B., Kwong, K. K., Belliveau, J. W., Brady, T. J., et al. (1995). Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Science, 268, 889–893.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, R., & Miller, J. (2001). Using the jackknife-based scoring method for measuring LRP onset effects in factorial designs. Psychophysiology, 38, 816–827.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, E. K., & Machizawa, M. G. (2004). Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature, 428, 748–751.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2003). Serial deployment of attention during visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 121–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyszecki, G., & Stiles, W. S. (1982). Color Science: Concepts and methods, quantitative data and formulae (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by research grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, The Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Canadian Research Chair program, and by an infrastructure grant from the Fonds de Recherche en Santé du Québec to the last author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre Jolicœur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perron, R., Lefebvre, C., Robitaille, N. et al. Attentional and anatomical considerations for the representation of simple stimuli in visual short-term memory: evidence from human electrophysiology. Psychological Research 73, 222–232 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-008-0214-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-008-0214-y

Keywords

Navigation