Abstract
We investigated which frame of reference is evoked during implicit motor sequence learning. Participants completed a typical serial reaction time task. In the first experiment, we isolated egocentric and allocentric frames of reference and found that learning was solely in an egocentric reference frame. In a second experiment, we isolated hand-centered space from other egocentric frames of reference. We found that for a one-handed sequencing task, the sequence was coded in an egocentric reference frame but not a hand-centered reference frame. Our results are restricted to implicit learning of novel sequences in the early stages of learning. These findings are consistent with claims that the neural mechanisms involved in motor skill learning operate in egocentric coordinates.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersen, R. A., Snyder, L. H., Bradley, D. C., & Xing, J. (1997). Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements. Annual Review of Neurosciences, 20, 303–330.
Bapi, R. S., Doya, K., & Harner, A. M. (2000). Evidence for effector independent and dependent representations and their differential time course of acquisition during motor sequence learning. Experimental Brain Research, 132, 149–162.
Bischoff-Grethe, A., Goedert, K. M., Willingham, D. T., & Grafton, S. T. (2004). Neural substrates of response-based sequence learning using fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 127–138.
Buxbaum, L. J., & Coslett, H. B. (1997). Subtypes of optic ataxia: reframing the disconnection account. Neurocase, 3, 159–166.
Cohen, A., Ivry, R. I., & Keele, S. W. (1990). Attention and structure in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 17–30.
Colby, C. L. (1998). Action-oriented spatial reference frames in cortex. Neuron, 20, 15–24.
Colby, C. L., & Goldberg, M. E. (1999). Space and attention in parietal cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 22, 319–349.
Culham, J. C., & Kanwisher, N. G. (2001). Neuroimaging of cognitive functions in human parietal cortex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 157–163.
Fendrich, D. W., Healy, A. F., & Bourne, L. E. (1991). Long-term repetition effects for motoric and perceptual procedures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 137–151.
Gordon, J., Ghilardi, M. F., & Ghez, C. (1994). Accuracy of planar reaching movements. I. Independence of direction and extent variability. Experimental Brain Research, 99, 97–111.
Grafton, S. T., Hazeltine, E., & Ivry, R. I. (1998). Abstract and effector-specific representations of motor sequences identified with PET. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 9420–9428.
Hazeltine, E. (2002). The representational nature of sequence learning: Evidence for goal-based codes. In W. H. Prinz, & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action (pp. 673–689). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heyes, C. M., & Foster, C. L. (2002). Motor learning by observation: Evidence from a serial reaction time task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 593–607.
Hikosaka, O., Nakahara, H., Rand, M. K., Sakai, K., Lu, X., Nakamura, K., et al. (1999). Parallel neural networks for learning sequential procedures. Trends in Neuroscience, 22, 465–471.
Hoffman, J., Martin, C., & Schilling, A. (2003). Unique transitions between stimuli and responses in SRT tasks: Evidence for the primacy of response predictions. Psychological Research, 67, 160–173.
Howard, J. H., Mutter, S. A., & Howard, D. V. (1992). Serial pattern learning by event observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1029–1039.
Japikse, K. C., Negash, S., Howard, J. H., & Howard, D. V. (2003). Intermanual transfer of procedural learning after extended practice of probabilistic sequences. Experimental Brain Research, 148, 38–49.
Keele, S. W., Jennings, P., Jones, S., Caulton, D., & Cohen, A. (1995). On the modularity of sequence representation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27, 17–30.
Kelly, S. W., & Burton, A. M. (2001). Learning complex sequences: No role for observation? Psychological Research, 65, 15–23.
Kelly, S. W., Burton, A. M., Riedel, B., & Lynch, E. (2003). Sequence learning by action and observation: Evidence for separate mechanisms. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 355–372.
Knee, R., Thomason, S., Ashe, J., & Willingham, D. T. (2007). The representation of explicit motor sequence knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 35, 326–333.
Liu, T., Lungu, O. V., Waechter, T., Willingham, D. T., & Ashe, J. (2007). Frames of reference during implicit and explicit learning. Experimental Brain Research, 180, 273–280.
Moscovitch, M., & Behrmann, M. (1994). Coding of spatial information in the somatosensory system: Evidence from patients with neglect following parietal lobe damage. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 151–155.
Nattkemper, D., & Prinz, W. (1997). Stimulus and response anticipation in a serial reaction time task. Psychological Research, 60, 98–112.
Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1–32.
Park, J., & Shea, C. (2003). Effect of practice on effector independence. Journal of Motor Behavior, 35, 33–40.
Remillard, G. (2003). Pure perceptual-based sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 581–597.
Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (1997). Parietal cortex: from sight to action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 7, 562–567.
Russeler, J., & Rosler, F. (2000). Implicit and explicit learning of event sequences: Evidence for distinct coding of perceptual and motor representations. Acta Psychologia, 104, 45–67.
Snyder, L. H., Grieve, K. L., Brotchie, P., & Andersen, R. A. (1998). Separate body- and world- referenced representations of visual space in parietal cortex. Nature, 394, 887–891.
Verwey, W. B., & Wright, D. (2004). Effector-independent and effector-dependent learning in the discrete sequence production task. Psychological Research, 68, 64–70.
Verwey, W. B., & Clegg, B. (2005). The serial RT task: Indications for components with different learning rates. Psychological Research, 69, 242–251.
Vindras, P., & Viviani, P. (1998). Frames of reference and control parameters in visuomanual pointing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 569–591.
Willingham, D. B. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 105, 558–584.
Willingham, D. B. (1999). Implicit motor sequence learning is not purely perceptual. Memory & Cognition, 27, 561–572.
Willingham, D. B., Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1989). On the development of procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1047–1060.
Willingham, D. B., Wells, L. A., Farrell, J. M., & Stemwedel, M. E. (2000). Implicit motor sequence learning is represented in response locations. Memory & Cognition, 28, 366–375.
Witt, J. K., Ashe, J., & Willingham, D. T. (2007). No evidence for hand-centered frame of reference in early implicit motor learning. Unpublished raw data.
Ziessler, M. (1994). The impact of motor responses on serial-pattern learning. Psychological Research, 57, 30–41.
Ziessler, M., & Nattkemper, D. (2001). Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: Further evidence from a serial reaction task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 595–613.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by National Institute of Health grants R01 MH065598-01A1, R01 NS040106-05, and R01 AG 24106-01A1 to Daniel T. Willingham.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Witt, J.K., Ashe, J. & Willingham, D.T. An egocentric frame of reference in implicit motor sequence learning. Psychological Research 72, 542–552 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-007-0129-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-007-0129-z