Skip to main content
Log in

Input monitoring and response selection as components of executive control in pro-saccades and anti-saccades

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several studies have shown that anti-saccades, more than pro-saccades, are executed under executive control. It is argued that executive control subsumes a variety of controlled processes. The present study tested whether some of these underlying processes are involved in the execution of anti-saccades. An experiment is reported in which two such processes were parametrically varied, namely input monitoring and response selection. This resulted in four selective interference conditions obtained by factorially combining the degree of input monitoring and the presence of response selection in the interference task. The four tasks were combined with a primary task which required the participants to perform either pro-saccades or anti-saccades. By comparison of performance in these dual-task conditions and performance in single-task conditions, it was shown that anti-saccades, but not pro-saccades, were delayed when the secondary task required input monitoring or response selection. The results are discussed with respect to theoretical attempts to deconstruct the concept of executive control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This could be taken as an indication that the effects of input monitoring and response selection are not additive. Peculiar about this interaction is that the combination of fixed presentation with the simple RT task tends to be slower than the combination of the random presentation with simple RT. The former combination is more vulnerable to the occurrence of anticipatory responses. It seems quite likely that after an anticipation, the next response is slowed resulting in a slower response on average.

References

  • Allain, S., Carbonnell, L., Burle, B., Hasbroucq, T., & Vidal, F. (2004). On-line executive control: An electromyographic study. Psychophysiology, 41, 113–116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. (1996). Exploring the central executive. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.) The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp.47–89). NewYork: Academic.

  • Briand, K. A., Strallow, D., Hening, W., Poizner, H., & Sereno, A. B. (1999). Control of voluntary and reflexive saccades in Parkinson’s disease. Experimental Brain Research, 129, 38–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, P. W. (1997). Theory and methodology in executive function research. In P. Rabbitt (Ed.) Methodology of frontal and executive function (pp. 81–116). Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbonnell, L., Hasbroucq, T., Grapperon, J., & Vidal, F. (2004). Response selection and motor areas: A behavioural and electrophysiological study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 2164–2174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deschuyteneer, M., & Vandierendonck, A. (2005a). Are ‘input monitoring’ and ‘response selection’ involved in solving simple mental additions. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 343–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deschuyteneer, M., & Vandierendonck, A. (2005b). The role of “response selection” and “input monitoring” in solving simple arithmetical products. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1472–1483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deschuyteneer, M., Vandierendonck, A., & Coeman, P. (2005). Exploring the role of different executive processes in solving simple mental subtractions and divisions (submitted for publication).

  • Deschuyteneer, M., Vandierendonck, A., & Muyllaert, I. (2006). Does solution of mental arithmetic problems such as 2 + 6 and 3 × 8 rely on the process of ‘memory updating’? Experimental Psychology (in press).

  • Eenshuistra, R. M., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & van der Molen, M. W. (2004). Age-related changes in anti-saccade task performance: Inhibitory control or working-memory engagement? Brain and Cognition, 56, 177–188.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Everling, S., & Fischer, B. (1998). The anti-saccade: a review of basic research and clinical studies. Neuropsychologia, 36, 885–899.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feifel, D., Farber, R. H., Clementz, B. A., Perry, W., & Anllo-Vento, L. (2004). Inhibitory deficits in ocular motor behavior in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 56, 333–339.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, J. M., & Walker, R. (1999). A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 661–721.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frith, C. D., & Done, D. J. (1986). Routes to action in reaction-time tasks. Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung, 48, 169–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukushima, J., Fukushima, K., Miyasaka, K., & Yamashita, I. (1994). Voluntary control of saccadic eye movement in patients with frontal cortical lesions and Parkinsonian patients with thatin schizophrenics. Biological Psychiatry, 36, 21–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guitton, D., Buchtel, H. A., & Douglas, R. M. (1985). Frontal lobe lesions in man cause difficulties in suppressing reflexive glances and in generating goal-directed saccades. Experimental Brain Research, 58, 455–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallett, P. E. (1978). Primary and secondary saccades to goals defined by instructions. Vision Research, 18, 1279–1296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hallett, P. E., & Adams, B. D. (1980). The predictability of saccadic latency in a novel voluntary oculomotor task. Vision Research, 20, 329–339.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, A. C., & Martin, R. C. (2005). Dissociations among tasks involving inhibition: A single-case study. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henik, A., Rafal, R., & Rhodes, D. (1994). Endogenously generated and visually guided saccades after lesion of the human frontal eye fields. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 400–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, S. B., Huddy, V., Barnes, T. R. E., Robbins, T. W., Crawford, T. J., Kennard, C., & Joyce, E. M. (2004). The relationship between anti-saccades, smooth pursuit, and executive dysfunction in first-episode schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 56, 553–559.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (2001). A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, C. (2001). Developmental functions for saccadic eye movement parameters derived from pro-and anti-saccade tasks. Experimental Brain Research, 139, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, C., Heinks, T., Andresen, B., Berg, P., & Moritz, S. (2000). Impaired modulation of the saccadic contingent negative variation preceding anti-saccades in schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 47, 978–990.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koval, M. J., Ford, K. A., & Everling, S. (2004). Effect of stimulus probability on anti-saccade error rates. Experimental Brain Research, 159, 268–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristíansson, A., Chen, Y., & Nakayama, K. (2001). Less attention is more in the preparation of anti-saccades, but not pro-saccades. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 1037–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D., & Irwin, D. E. (2000). Don’t look! Don’t touch! Inhibitory control of eye and hand movements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 107–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massen, C. (2004). Parallel programming of exogenous and endogenous components in the anti-saccade task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 475–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. P., Macrae, C. N., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2002). Working memory and the suppression of reflexive saccades. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 95–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mort, D. J., Perry, R. J., Mannan, S. K., Hodgson, T. L., Anderson, E., Quest, R., McRobbie, D., McBride, A., Husain, M., & Kennard, C. (2003). Differential cortical activation during voluntary and reflexive saccades in man. NeuroImage, 18, 231–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mostofsky, S. H., Lasker, A. G., Singer, H. S., Denckla, M. B., & Zee, D. S. (2001). Oculomotor abnormalities in boys with Tourette syndrome with and without ADHD. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 12, 1464–1472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwenhuis, S., Broerse, A., Nielen, M. M. A., & de Jong, R. (2004). A goal activation approach to the study of executive function: An application to anti-saccade tasks. Brain and Cognition, 56, 198–214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Driscoll, G. A., Depatie, L., Holahan, A. L. V., Savion-Lemieux, T., Barr, R. G., Jolicoeur, C., & Douglas, V. I. (2005). Executive functions and methylphenidate response in subtypes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 57, 1452–1460.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olincy, A., Ross, R. G., Youngd, D. A., & Freedman, R. (1997). Age diminishes performance on an anti-saccade eye movement task. Neurobiology of Aging, 18, 483–489.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olk, B., Chang, E., Kingstone, A., & Ro, T. (2006). Modulation of anti-saccades by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human frontal eye field. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 76–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, D. G., & Sahraie, A. (2003). Oculomotor control and the maintenance of spatially and temporally distributed events in visuo-spatial working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 1089–1111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2005). Switching of response modalities. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 1325–1338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierrot-Deseilligny, C., Rivaud, S., Gaymard, B., & Agid, Y. (1991). Cortical control of reflexive visually guided saccades. Brain, 114, 1473–1485.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pierrot-Deseilligny, C., Muri, R. M., Nyffeler, T., & Milea, D. (2005). The role of the human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in ocular motor behavior. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1039, 239–251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ploner, C. J., Gaymard, B. M., Rivaud-Péchoux, S., & Pierrot-Deseilligny, C. (2005). The prefrontal substrate of reflexive saccade inhibition in humans. Biological Psychiatry, 57, 1159–1165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. J. Jr., Hager, L. D., & Heron, C. (1994). Prefrontal cognitive processes: Working memory and inhibition in the anti-saccade task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 374–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, T. (1999). Processing differences between simple and choice reactions affect bottleneck localization in overlapping tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 408–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2003). The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 92–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, A., & Biederman, I. (1976). Mental set and mental shift revisited. Journal of Psychology, 89, 669–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuyven, E., Van der Goten, K., Vandierendonck, A., Claeys, K., & Crevits, L. .(2000). Saccadic eye movements under conditions of cognitive load. Acta Psychologica, 104, 69–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Szmalec, A., Vandierendonck, A., & Kemps, E. (2005). Response selection involves executive control: Evidence from the selective interference paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 33, 531–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, N., Schrock, J. C., & Engle, R. W. (2004). Working memory capacity and the anti-saccade task: Individual differences in voluntary saccade control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 1302–1321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vandierendonck, A. (2000). Bias and processing capacity in generation of random time intervals. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 1, 205–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R., Husain, M., Hodgson, T. L., Harrison, J., & Kennard, C. (1998). Saccadic eye movement and working memory deficits following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychologia, 36, 1141–1159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Denis Drieghe is a senior research assistant of the Fund for Scientific Research-Flanders. The research reported in this article was supported by grant no. 10251101 of the Special Research Fund of Ghent University to the first author and by a PhD grant (no. 011D1201) of the same agency to the second author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André Vandierendonck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vandierendonck, A., Deschuyteneer, M., Depoorter, A. et al. Input monitoring and response selection as components of executive control in pro-saccades and anti-saccades. Psychological Research 72, 1–11 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-006-0078-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-006-0078-y

Keywords

Navigation