Skip to main content
Log in

Risk of bowel resection in incarcerated inguinal hernia: watch out for ASA score and hernia type

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Incarcerated inguinal hernias can promote bowel ischemia. Emergent bowel resection is associated with increased postoperative morbidity. Risk factors for bowel resection might identify patients who benefit from elective inguinal hernia repair.

Methods

Sixty-five consecutive patients undergoing emergency inguinal hernia repair between 2012 and 2018 at our institution were entered in a prospective database. Data analysis was approved by the local ethics committee. Patient characteristics, surgery data, and postoperative outcomes were compared between patients with and without bowel resection. Risk factors for bowel resection were assessed with univariate and multivariate analysis.

Results

Patients requiring bowel resection were more often female (87%, P = 0.004) and presented in 67% with a femoral hernia. Postoperative complications occurred more often after hernia reduction and bowel resection compared to no resection (67% vs. 36%, P = 0.035). ASA score 3–4 and femoral herniation were independent predictors of bowel resection (P = 0,046 and P = 0,047, respectively).

Conclusion

Highly comorbid patients can profit from early elective hernia repair to prevent bowel resection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Herniamed Registry.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Forse RA (2015) Clinical practice Groin hernias in adults. N Engl J Med 372(8):756–63. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp1404068

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kingsnorth A, LeBlanc K (2003) Hernias: inguinal and incisional. Lancet 362(9395):1561–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14746-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. HerniaSurge Group (2018) International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia 22(1):1–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Van den Heuvel B, Dwars BJ, Klassen DR, Bonjer HJ (2011) Is surgical repair of an asymptomatic groin hernia appropriate? Rev Hernia 15(3):251–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0796-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Patterson TJ, Beck J, Currie PJ, Spence RAJ, Spence G (2019) Meta-analysis of patient-reported outcomes after laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 106(7):824–836. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chamary VL (1993) Femoral hernia: intestinal obstruction is an unrecognized source of morbidity and mortality. Br J Surg 80(2):230–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800800237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, Bouillot JL, Campanelli G, Conze J, de Lange D, Fortelny R, Heikkinen T, Kingsnorth A, Kukleta J, Morales-Conde S, Nordin P, Schumpelick V, Smedberg S, Smietanski M, Weber G, Miserez M (2009) European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia 13(4):343–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0529-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gallegos NC, Dawson J, Jarvis M, Hobsley M (1991) Risk of strangulation in groin hernias. Br J Surg 78(10):1171–1173. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800781007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dahlstrand U, Wollert S, Nordin P, Sandblom G, Gunnarsson U (2009) Emergency femoral hernia repair: a study based on a national register. Ann Surg 249(4):672–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819ed943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nilsson H, Holmberg H, Nordin P (2018) Groin hernia repair in women - a nationwide register study. Am J Surg 216(2):274–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.07.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ge BJ, Huang Q, Liu LM, Bian HP, Fan YZ (2010) Risk factors for bowel resection and outcome in patients with incarcerated groin hernias. Hernia 14(3):259–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0602-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Slankamenac K, Graf R, Barkun J, Puhan MA, Clavien PA (2013) The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity. Ann Surg 258(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318296c732 (PMID: 23728278)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kurt N, Oncel M, Ozkan Z, Bingul S (2003) Risk and outcome of bowel resection in patients with incarcerated groin hernias: retrospective study. World J Surg 27(6):741–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-003-6826-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen P, Huang L, Yang W, He D, Liu X, Wang Y, Yu Y, Yang L, Zhou Z (2019) Risk factors for bowel resection among patients with incarcerated groin hernias: a meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med 38(2):376–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2019.09.023.17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Oishi SN, Page CP, Schwesinger WH. (1991) Complicated presentations of groin hernias. Am J Surg 162(6):568-70 discussion 571. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(91)90110-y

  17. Köckerling F, Koch A, Lorenz R (2019) Groin hernias in women-a review of the literature. Front Surg 6:4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2019.00004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hernández-Irizarry R, Zendejas B, Ramirez T, Moreno M, Ali SM, Lohse CM, Farley DR (2012) Trends in emergent inguinal hernia surgery in Olmsted County, MN: a population-based study. Hernia 16(4):397–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-012-0926-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Akinci M, Ergül Z, Kulah B, Yilmaz KB, Kulacoğlu H (2010) Risk factors related with unfavorable outcomes in groin hernia repairs. Hernia 14(5):489–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-010-0683-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ohana G, Manevwitch I, Weil R, Melki Y, Seror D, Powsner E, Dreznik Z (2004) Inguinal hernia: challenging the traditional indication for surgery in asymptomatic patients. Hernia 8(2):117–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-003-0184-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Köckerling F, Adolf D, Lorenz R, Stechemesser B, Kuthe A, Conze J, Lammers B, Fortelny R, Mayer F, Zarras K, Reinpold W, Hoffmann H, Weyhe D (2022) Perioperative outcome in groin hernia repair: what are the most important influencing factors? Hernia 26(1):201–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02417-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Baimas-George M, Watson M, Elhage S, Parala-Metz A, Vrochides D, Davis BR (2020) Prehabilitation in frail surgical patients: a systematic review. World J Surg 44(11):3668–3678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05658-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gillis C, Buhler K, Bresee L, Carli F, Gramlich L, Culos-Reed N, Sajobi TT, Fenton TR (2018) Effects of nutritional prehabilitation, with and without exercise, on outcomes of patients who undergo colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 155(2):391-410.e4. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.05.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Köckerling F, Schug-Pass C (2014) Tailored approach in inguinal hernia repair - decision tree based on the guidelines. Front Surg 20(1):20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2014.00020

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Anja Katharina Dwertmann, Andrea Wirsching and Sebastian Soppe. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Anja Katharina Dwertmann and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Nocito.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The local ethics committee approved the current study (Project-ID 2021–01291, Ethikkommission Nordwest- und Zentralschweiz).

Consent to participate

Patients provided written informed consent for documentation of their anonymized patient data in the Herniamed Registry GmbH i.G.

Consent for publication

All authors reviewed the final version of the manuscript and approved its submission.

Human and animal rights

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Andrea Wirsching and Antonio Nocito shared the last authorship.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dwertmann, A.K., Soppe, S., Hefermehl, L. et al. Risk of bowel resection in incarcerated inguinal hernia: watch out for ASA score and hernia type. Langenbecks Arch Surg 407, 3711–3717 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02650-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02650-1

Keywords

Navigation