Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Preoperative risk factors for mortality after relaparotomy: analysis of 254 patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of this work was to analyze preoperative mortality risk factors after relaparotomy for abdominal surgery in a unit of General Surgery at a University Hospital.

Methods

A total of 314 relaparotomies in 254 patients were performed between February 2004 and February 2008. We analyzed data about past medical history, first operation, as well as clinical and biochemical parameters previous to reoperation.

Results

Indications for relaparotomy were peritonitis, bleeding, abscess, exploratory laparotomy, and evisceration. Overall mortality was 22%. Mortality of the patients with a single relaparotomy was 20% vs. 44% if they were reoperated upon twice. Mortality was associated with age, past history of cardiovascular disease, active neoplasm, previous treatment with platelet anti-aggregant drugs, first surgery American Society of Anesthesia score, and the presence of an anastomosis. Preoperative data associated with mortality were the number of systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria, suture dehiscense, ileus, positive blood cultures, mechanical ventilation, artificial nutrition, antibiotics or vasoactive drugs, tachycardia, and abnormal body temperature. High white blood cell count or bilirrubin levels and low albumin or prothrombin time were also associated with mortality. Multivariate logistic regression analysis isolated age (P = 0.02), abnormal body temperature (P = 0.02), and the need of mechanical ventilation (P = 0.004) as independent preoperative variables predictive for mortality after relaparotomy.

Conclusions

Advanced age, the presence of either fever or hypothermia, and the need of mechanical ventilation are preoperative risk factors associated with mortality after relaparotomy and should be considered when planning reintervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ching SS, Muralikrishnan VP, Whiteley GS (2003) Relaparotomy: a five-year review of indications and outcome. Int J Clin Pract 57:333–337

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Unalp HR, Kamer E, Kar H et al (2006) Urgent abdominal re-explorations. World J Emerg Surg 1:10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sautner T, Gotzinger P, Redl Wenzl E et al (1997) Does reoperation for abdominal sepsis enhance the inflammatory host response? Arch Surg 132:250–255

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bunt TJ (1985) Urgent relaparotomy: the high-risk, no-choice operation. Surgery 98:555–560

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wain M, Sykes P (1987) Emergency abdominal re-exploration in a district general hospital. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 69:169–174

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Calandra T, Cohen J (2005) The International Sepsis Forum Consensus Conference on definitions of infections in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 33:1538–1548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tera H, Aberg C (1975) Relaparotomy. A ten-year series. Acta Chir Scand 141:637–644

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zer M, Dux S, Dintsman M (1980) The timing of relaparotomy and its influence on prognosis. A 10 year survey. Am J Surg 139:338–343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Keller E, Neher M, Schuster HP (1983) Relaparotomy, retrospective analysis and intensive care aspects. Langenbecks Archiv fur Chir 360:167–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Harbrecht PJ, Garrison RN, Fry DE (1984) Early urgent relaparotomy. Arch Surg 119:369–374

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ross SE, Morehouse PD (1986) Urgent and emergent relaparotomy in trauma. A preventable cause of increased mortality. Am Surg 52:308–311

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hinsdale JG, Jaffe BM (1984) Re-operations for intra-abdominal sepsis. Indications and results in a moern critical care setting. Ann Surg 199:31–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Osipov AP, Bazunov VA (1988) The problem of relaparotomy in emergency surgery. Vestn Khir Im I I Grek 140:71–74

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pusajó JF, Bumaschny E, Doglio GR et al (1993) Postoperative intraabdominal sepsis requiring reoperation: value of a predictive index. Arch Surg 128:218–222

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sytnik AL, Kononenko NG, Neustroev VN et al (1988) Relaparotomy. Klin Khir 4:18–20

    Google Scholar 

  16. Koperna T, Schulz F (2000) Relaparotomy in peritonitis: prognosis and treatment of patients with persisting intraabdominal infection. World J Surg 24:32–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hutchins RR, Gunning MP, Lucas DN et al (2004) Relaparotomy for suspected intraperitoneal sepsis after abdominal surgery. World J Surg 28:137–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Visokai V, Lipska L, Bergmann P et al (2006) Re-laparotomy for complications of urgent abdominal disorders. Rozhi Chir 85:180–185

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mulier S, Penninckx F, Verwaest C et al (2003) Factors affecting mortality in generalized postoperative peritonitis: multivariate analysis in 96 patients. World J Surg 27:379–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Campillo-Soto A, Flores-Pastor B, Soria-Aledo V et al (2006) The POSSUM scoring system: an instrument for measuring quality in surgical patients. Cir Esp 80:395–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. van Ruler O, Lamme B, Gouma DJ et al (2007) Variables associated with positive findings at relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis. Crit Care Med 35:468–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gibbs J, Cull W, Henderson W et al (1999) Preoperative serum albumin level as a predictor of operative mortality and morbidity: results from the National VA Surgical Risk Study. Arch Surg 134:36–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mosdell DM, Morris DM, Voltura A et al (1991) Antibiotic treatment for surgical peritonitis. Ann Surg 214:543–549

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bunt TJ (1986) Non-directed relaparotomy for intra-abdominal sepsis. A futile procedure. Am Surg 52:294–298

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. van Ruler O, Mahler CW, Boer KR et al (2007) Comparison of on-demand vs planned relaparotomy strategy in patients with severe peritonitis: a randomized trial. JAMA 298:865–872

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hau T, Ohmann C, Wolmershauser A et al (1995) Planned relaparotomy vs relaparotomy on demand in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections. The Peritonitis Study Group of the Surgical Infection Society-Europe. Arch Surg 130:1193–1196 discussion 6-7

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gotzinger P, Gebhard B, Wamser P et al (1996) Revision of diffuse pritonitis: planned versus on demand. Langenbecks Archiv Chir 381:343–347

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Holzheimer RG, Gathof B (2003) Re-operation for complicated secondary peritonitis—how to identify patients at risk for persistent sepsis. Eur J Med Res 8:125–134

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Velmahos GC, Degiannis E, Souter I (1998) Relaparotomies for abdominal sepsis—why, when, how? A collective review. South Afr J Surg 36:52–56

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rakic M, Popovic D, Druzijanic N et al (2005) Comparison of on-demand vs planned relaparotomy for treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections. Croat Med J 46:957–963

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Secció de Cirurgia d’Urgències, Servei de Cirurgia General i Digestiva, Hospital Universitari del Mar. IMAS, Passeig Marítim 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain

    Isidro Martínez-Casas, Juan J. Sancho, Esther Nve, Maria-José Pons & Estela Membrilla

  2. Servei de Cirurgia General i Digestiva, Hospital Universitari del Mar. IMAS, Passeig Marítim 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain

    Luis Grande

Authors
  1. Isidro Martínez-Casas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Juan J. Sancho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Esther Nve
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maria-José Pons
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Estela Membrilla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Luis Grande
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isidro Martínez-Casas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martínez-Casas, I., Sancho, J.J., Nve, E. et al. Preoperative risk factors for mortality after relaparotomy: analysis of 254 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395, 527–534 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-009-0538-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-009-0538-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation