Abstract
Background
Emergency laparotomy (EL) is a common urgent surgical procedure with high risk for postoperative complications. Complications impair the prognosis and prolong the hospital stay. This study explored the incidence and distribution of complications and their impact on short-term mortality after EL.
Methods
This was a retrospective single-center register-based cohort study of 674 adults undergoing midline EL between May 2015 and December 2017. The primary outcome was operation-related or medical complication after EL. The secondary outcome was mortality in 90-day follow-up. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent risk factors for complications.
Results
A total of 389 (58%) patients developed complications after EL, including 215 (32%) patients with operation-related complications and 361 (54%) patients with medical complications. Most of the complications were Clavien-Dindo classification type 4b (28%) and type 2 (22%). Operation-related complications occurred later compared to medical complications. Respiratory complications were the most common medical complications, and infections were the most common operation-related complications. The 30- and 90-day mortalities were higher in both the medical (17.2%, 26.2%) and operation-related complication groups (13.5%, 24.2%) compared to patients without complications (10.5% and 4.8%, 14.8% and 8.0%). Low albumin, high surgical urgency, excessive alcohol consumption and medical complications were associated with operation-related complications. Older age, high ASA class and operation-related complications were associated with medical complications.
Conclusions
This study demonstrated that EL is associated with a high risk of complications and poor short-term outcome. Complications impair the prognosis regardless of which kind of EL is in question.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Emergency laparotomy (EL) is a high-risk operation; more than a half of the patients are afflicted with complications [1]. Thirty to 50% of EL patients present with systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis and septic shock, and mortality remains high [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Most patients undergoing EL are elderly with comorbidities; for example, malignancies are present in approximately 10% of the patients [2, 10, 11].
Postoperative complications and other adverse events following EL prolong hospital stay and impair the outcome [10, 12]. Compared with elective operations, EL patients are up to five times more likely to die within 30 days after their operation [12]. Severe septic shock, multi-organ failure, cardiopulmonary incidents, surgical complications and malignant diseases are the most typical causes of death after EL [2]. Accordingly, among elderly the functional outcomes and return to independency after EL are poor [13].
Although emergency general surgical admissions comprise the largest group of all surgical admissions, several studies have shown a variation in the delivery of evidence-based care and outcomes [1, 14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. EL patients have been a relatively overlooked group [22], but studies in the past few years show improvement in outcomes using enhanced recovery protocols among this high-risk patient group [23,24,25,26,27,28]. The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society published guidelines for EL patients in 2021 and suggest this protocol should be routinely applied to the care of EL patients [29].
Although ELs carry a significant rate of complications and high mortality, studies are lacking focusing on the medical complications and time of onset of the observed complications. In the present study, we aim to explore the rate of both medical and operation-related complications and their impact on the short-term mortality after EL. Our hypothesis is that patient-related factors including age and comorbidities play a major role in the incidence of complications; furthermore, we hypothesized that recorded complications have a major impact on mortality.
Methods
This retrospective register-based cohort study was conducted in Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland. The study protocol was approved by the hospital administration (reference number 66/2018). According to the local protocol, no statement from the Ethics Committee was required because of the retrospective study design.
Patients
All the patients who had undergone a midline EL between May 2015 and December 2017 were reviewed from the hospital’s discharge records, and the eligible patients were included in the study. The exclusion criteria were age < 18 years, urgent or emergency cholecystectomy or appendectomy, or emergency or urgent laparotomy due to a gynecological cause, leaving a total of 674 EL patients.
Data extraction
The data were obtained from electronic medical records, anesthesia charts and operation charts. The following data were collected: age, sex, diagnosis, type and duration of the operation, complication type, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) and hospital LOS. The urgency of the operation was classified as follows: immediate operation performed within 3 h after the decision to operate, very urgent operation performed within 3–8 h after the decision to operate and urgent operation performed within 8–24 h after the decision to operate. The severity of the underlying comorbidities was assessed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) [30]. The American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (ASA) was used to estimate the patient's preoperative risk [31]. Preoperative levels of albumin, leukocytes, platelets, hemoglobin and C-reactive protein (CRP) were obtained from the patients’ medical records.
Complications
Postoperative complications recorded by the treating physicians were obtained from the medical records. The analysis included all postoperative complications during the hospital stay. The postoperative complications were classified as operation-related or medical and as minor or major complications. According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, classes I–II were regarded as minor complications and classes III–V as major complications [30]. Operation-related complications included surgical site infection, fascial rupture, bleeding, seroma, anastomotic leakage, strangulation or herniation, and the need for reoperation during the same LOS. Medical complications included pneumonia, respiratory dysfunction, pulmonary embolism, sepsis, acute kidney dysfunction, acute liver dysfunction, stroke, asystole and resuscitation, heart failure and atrial fibrillation. The complications were categorized following the protocol presented in our previous study [32]. The time of onset of complications was determined within the accuracy of 1 day. Complications were categorized as early complications, i.e., the onset within 1–4 days after the operation, or as late complications, i.e., the onset > 4 days after the operation. The times of deaths were retrieved from the hospital's medical records to assess the in-hospital, 30- and 90-day mortality rates.
Statistical analysis
Due to the retrospective study design, we did not perform a power calculation to assess the sample size. Statistical analyses were performed with IBM SPSS statistics 27 software (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27.0, Armonk, NY, USA). Categorical data are presented as numbers (n) and percentages (%). Continuous variables are expressed as medians and 25th to 75th percentiles [25th–75th]. Comparisons were performed with Pearson's chi-square for categorical data and the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test for continuous data. Two-tailed p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate odds ratios (OR) for surgical and medical complications. Age and categorical variables with univariate significance <0.05 were included in the model one by one using the enter method. Variables with multivariate significance <0.05 were kept in the model as well as those with significant impact on the log-likelyhood function.
Results
Complications were recorded after EL in 389 (58%) patients. Operation-related complications were recorded after an EL in 215 (31.9%) patients and medical complications in 361 (53.6%) patients. One hundred eighty-six (27.6%) patients had both a medical and an operation-related complication. Wound infections and intra-abdominal abscesses were the most common operation-related complications. One hundred twenty-nine (19.1%) patients required reoperation. Most of the operation-related complications, except bleedings, were classified as late complications. Respiratory dysfunction, pneumonia and septicemia were the most common medical complications. Medical complications were often early with exception of neurological complications such as transient ischemic attack (TIA). Most of the complications were Clavien-Dindo classification type 4b (28%) and type 2 (22%) (Tables 1 and 2).
The patients with operation-related complications had higher ASA class, a higher rate of excessive alcohol consumption and a longer duration of the operation compared with the patients with no operation-related complications. The patients whose operation was contaminated or those with stoma had a higher rate of operation-related complications.
ICU admissions were more common in the patients with operation-related complications compared with those without. Hospital LOS and ICU LOS were longer in patients with operation-related complications. Compared with the patients with no operation-related complications, both hospital and 90-day mortalities were higher in the patients with operation related complications (Table 3).
The patients with medical complications were older and had higher ASA class and CCI scores, a longer duration of operation and a higher rate of very urgent operations compared with the patients without medical complications. The patients with EL due to ulcer or hernia had a lower rate of medical complications compared with the patients with other causes of EL. The patients whose emergency laparotomy was contaminated or those with stoma had a higher rate of medical complications. Primary suturing and anastomosis were more common among patients without medical complications (Table 4).
ICU admissions were more common in patients with medical complications, and ICU LOS and hospital LOS were significantly longer compared with the patients without medical complications. The hospital, 30- and 90-day mortalities were significantly higher in the patients with medical complications compared with the patients without medical complications (Table 4).
The hospital, 30- and 90-day mortalities were higher among patients with medical complications (13.9%, 17.2%, 26.2%) compared with the operation-related complication group (12.6%, 13.5%, 24.2%). ICU admissions were more common, and ICU LOSs were longer in the operation-related complication group (57.2%, 8 [4–17] days) compared with the medical complication group (51.8%, 5 [3–12] days). (Tables 3 and 4).
Multivariate analysis
According to the multivariate analysis, lower albumin level, higher surgical urgency, excessive alcohol consumption, higher preoperative body mass index (BMI) and medical complications were associated with operation-related complications (Table 5). Older age, higher ASA class and operation-related complications were associated with medical complications (Table 6.)
Discussion
This study demonstrates that patients undergoing EL have a significant risk for both medical and operation-related complications. More than a half of the EL patients had at least one complication. The majority of the complications (50%) were medical complications and 30% were operation related. The medical complications were associated with patient-related factors, and operation-related complications were more often disease related. Medical complications occurred at an earlier phase of the postoperative care compared with operation-related complications.
In the present study, medical complications were recorded more often during the first 4 days after surgery, and operation-related complications developed at a later phase of recovery. Two thirds of the recorded complications were Clavien-Dindo class III or higher. Frailty, high ASA class, low albumin level and age have been reported as risk factors for complications [33]. Also in this study, age, high ASA class and higher preoperative CRP were associated with medical complications.
Medical complications were recorded earlier compared to operation-related complications, which may indicate that patients' deterioration due to medical complications may increase the risk for operation-related complications. It has been shown that pulmonary diseases increase the risk for anastomotic leakage after colon surgery [34], and wound infections are associated with fascial rupture and abdominal wall dehiscence [35]. As in these elective settings, also in this study medical complication may increase the risk for operation-related complication; however, causation could not be demonstrated.
According to our knowledge, the present study is the first one focusing on the onset of complications. Systemic dysfunction caused by inflammation is already present before surgery in the EL patients, whereas for the elective procedures the systematic inflammatory response is more often a postoperative phenomenon [36]. Similar factors associated with complications were found in a previous study focusing on elective patients undergoing free flap surgery for cancer of the head and neck [32]. In this elective setting, both complication types occurred more often late than early [32]. Although the patient cohort in that previous study was significantly different compared with ours, the factors associated with complications were similar.
The patients requiring an urgent surgery have several predisposing factors for systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), and the upregulation of the systemic inflammatory response is the primary cause of death in patients undergoing emergency surgery [36]. Already prior to laparotomy 30–50% of patients present SIRS, sepsis or septic shock [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. This is also considered in ERAS protocols that are designed to minimize the physiological impact and stress response to surgical insult but in EL patients this insult and stress are already occurring prior to surgery [29]. These patients are also prone to infections because tissue injury following surgery or trauma increase the risk for infections [37]. In a Danish study, the median time from surgery to any surgical site infection or pulmonary complication was 9 days [38]. Difference in the time of onset of complications could be explained by the different of SIRS after EL.
The rate of complications in the present study is in line with previous studies [1, 39]. Wound infection was the most common operation-related complication as has been reported before [1]. However, we reported a higher rate of pneumonia compared with previous studies [3, 12].
Thirty- and 90-day mortality rates were high after EL in both medical and operation-related complication groups, and rates were similar compared to the previously reported rate [1, 4, 12, 40]. In this study the medical complications seemed to worsen the prognosis of the patient more than the operation-related complications.
Patients with old age and multiple comorbidities have a high risk for complications significantly impairing their prognosis. A British study found that age alone increases the 30-day mortality after EL [14]. In this study, patient-related factors were found to be significant for both medical and operation-related complications.
Since the intervention options to enhance the outcome are limited, EL is a high-risk operation regardless of the nature of the procedure. In elective abdominal surgery, ERAS protocols are commonly used to reduce complications and improve outcome [41]. Recent meta-analysis showed that ERAS reduced postoperative complications and hospital stay also in emergency surgery [42]. Although complete optimization of preoperative ERAS components is not achievable, the rest of the intra- and postoperative components of ERAS protocols are applicable and appropriate also in the emergency setting [42]. Information about the incidence of complications after emergency laparotomy could help to develop the ERAS protocols further and also improve active rehabilitation immediately after surgery. During this study the ERAS protocol was not applied to the EL patients in our hospital.
Some previous studies have demonstrated that emergency laparoscopic surgery is associated with a lower rate of complications compared with the emergency laparotomy [2, 10]. Even though laparoscopy has become increasingly common nowadays, it cannot fully replace the EL, and the rate of procedure conversion to open laparotomy remains high [43]. The most complex cases, unstable patients and those with several previous laparotomies are not suitable for laparoscopy. In some cases, the length of operation may create a problem since longer duration of surgery is associated with postoperative complications [44]. This highlights the importance of meticulous patient selection when choosing the right method for emergency surgery.
The risk of complications is high after EL, and therefore consideration is required in the treatment of these patients. At least in some high-risk patient groups palliative care could be an option as surgery is unlikely to extend the patient's life expectancy in a positive manner. There are a few studies focusing on the palliative care as an option for surgery, but their results do not provide an unambiguous answer to the question of which patients should be referred to non-operative treatment [45, 46]. Hopefully further studies will provide more information on how to choose between operative or conservative treatment in frail patients in need of emergency laparotomy.
The surgical insult of a major operation like laparotomy increases the inflammatory response, which can predispose especially the frail and comorbid patients to medical complications [45, 46]. One could hypothesize that these medical complications could be one factor predisposing patients later to surgical complications. However, the present setting does not allow us to show any causality between the medical and surgical complications.
Limitations
This study has a few limitations. The present study is a retrospective single-center cohort study, which may impair the generalization of the results. However, the rate and types of complications were in line with the previous studies. We included all EL patients in our hospital during the study period; thus, the risk of selection bias is low. As a limitation we did not have access to data on the acute physiology of the patients. Due to the retrospective study design, some patient data were missing, and we are not able to demonstrate causality between medical and operation-related complications.
Conclusion
Operation-related complications occurred later after surgery compared with medical complications. The type of EL did not have a significant impact on the rate of complications. Low albumin level, high preoperative CRP, older age, and high ASA class increase the risk for medical complications after EL.
References
Havens JM, Peetz AB, Do WS et al (2015) The excess morbidity and mortality of emergency general surgery. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 78:306–311. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000517
Tolstrup M-B, Watt SK, Gögenur I (2017) Morbidity and mortality rates after emergency abdominal surgery: an analysis of 4346 patients scheduled for emergency laparotomy or laparoscopy. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 402:615–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1493-1
Sharoky CE, Bailey EA, Sellers MM et al (2017) Outcomes of hospitalized patients undergoing emergency general surgery remote from admission. Surgery 162:612–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2017.05.008
Jeppesen MM, Thygesen LC, Ekeloef S, Gögenur I (2019) A nationwide cohort study of short- and long-term outcomes following emergency laparotomy. Danish Med J 66(1):A5523
Awad S, Herrod PJJ, Palmer R et al (2012) One- and two-year outcomes and predictors of mortality following emergency laparotomy: a consecutive series from a United Kingdom teaching hospital. World J Surg 36:2060–2067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1614-0
Peden C, Scott MJ (2015) Anesthesia for emergency abdominal surgery. Anesthesiol Clin 33:209–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anclin.2014.11.012
Ogola GO, Gale SC, Haider A, Shafi S (2015) The financial burden of emergency general surgery: national estimates 2010 to 2060. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 79:444–448. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000787
Scott JW, Olufajo OA, Brat GA et al (2016) Use of National Burden to define operative emergency general surgery. JAMA Surg 151:e160480. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.0480
Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Raval MV et al (2011) Comparison of hospital performance in emergency versus elective general surgery operations at 198 hospitals. J Am Coll Surg 212:20-28.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.09.026
Mentula PJ, Leppäniemi AK (2014) Applicability of the Clavien–Dindo classification to emergency surgical procedures: a retrospective cohort study on 444 consecutive patients. Patient Saf Surg 8:31. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-8-31
Jeppesen MH, Tolstrup M-B, Watt SK, Gögenur I (2016) Risk factors affecting morbidity and mortality following emergency laparotomy for small bowel obstruction: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg (London, England) 28:63–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.02.059
Sørensen LT, Malaki A, Wille-Jørgensen P et al (2007) Risk factors for mortality and postoperative complications after gastrointestinal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 11:903–910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0165-4
Louis DJ, Hsu A, Brand MI, Saclarides TJ (2009) Morbidity and mortality in octogenarians and older undergoing major intestinal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 52:59–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819754d4
Saunders DI, Murray D, Pichel AC et al (2012) Variations in mortality after emergency laparotomy: the first report of the UK Emergency Laparotomy Network. Br J Anaesth 109:368–375. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aes165
Columbus AB, Morris MA, Lilley EJ et al (2018) Critical differences between elective and emergency surgery: identifying domains for quality improvement in emergency general surgery. Surgery 163:832–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2017.11.017
Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY et al (2010) Comparison of hospital performance in nonemergency versus emergency colorectal operations at 142 hospitals. J Am Coll Surg 210:155–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.10.016
Ingraham AM, Ayturk MD, Kiefe CI, Santry HP (2019) Adherence to 20 emergency general surgery best practices: results of a national survey. Ann Surg 270:270–280. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002746
Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Raval MV et al (2011) Variation in quality of care after emergency general surgery procedures in the elderly. J Am Coll Surg 212:1039–1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.03.001
Daniel VT, Ingraham AM, Khubchandani JA et al (2019) Variations in the delivery of emergency general surgery care in the era of acute care surgery. Jt Commun J Qual Patient Saf 45:14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.04.012
Oliver CM, Bassett MG, Poulton TE et al (2018) Organisational factors and mortality after an emergency laparotomy: multilevel analysis of 39 903 National Emergency Laparotomy Audit patients. Br J Anaesth 121:1346–1356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2018.07.040
Symons NRA, Moorthy K, Vincent CA, London Surgical Research Group (2016) Reliability in the process of care during emergency general surgical admission: a prospective cohort study. Int J Surg 32:143–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.07.002
Lee KC, Sturgeon D, Lipsitz S et al (2020) Mortality and health care utilization among medicare patients undergoing emergency general surgery vs those with acute medical conditions. JAMA Surg 155:216–223. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.5087
Huddart S, Peden CJ, Swart M et al (2015) Use of a pathway quality improvement care bundle to reduce mortality after emergency laparotomy. Br J Surg 102:57–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9658
Lohsiriwat V (2014) Enhanced recovery after surgery vs conventional care in emergency colorectal surgery. World J Gastroenterol 20:13950–13955. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13950
Wisely JC, Barclay KL (2016) Effects of an enhanced recovery after surgery programme on emergency surgical patients. ANZ J Surg 86:883–888. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.13465
Roulin D, Blanc C, Muradbegovic M et al (2014) Enhanced recovery pathway for urgent colectomy. World J Surg 38:2153–2159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2518-y
Aggarwal G, Peden CJ, Mohammed MA et al (2019) Evaluation of the collaborative use of an evidence-based care bundle in emergency laparotomy. JAMA Surg 154:e190145. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0145
Paduraru M, Ponchietti L, Casas IM et al (2017) Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)—the evidence in geriatric emergency surgery: a systematic review. Chirurgia (Bucur) 112:546–557. https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.112.5.546
Peden CJ, Aggarwal G, Aitken RJ et al (2021) Guidelines for perioperative care for emergency laparotomy enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations: Part 1—preoperative: diagnosis, rapid assessment and optimization. World J Surg 45:1272–1290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-05994-9
de la Plaza LR, Ramia Ángel JM, Bellón JM et al (2018) Clinical validation of the comprehensive complication index as a measure of postoperative morbidity at a surgical department: a prospective study. Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002839
Mudumbai SC, Pershing S, Bowe T et al (2019) Development and validation of a predictive model for American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status. BMC Health Serv Res. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4640-x
Lahtinen S, Koivunen P, Ala-Kokko T et al (2018) Complications and outcome after free flap surgery for cancer of the head and neck. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 56:684–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.07.009
Parmar KL, Pearce L, Farrell I et al (2017) Influence of frailty in older patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: a UK-based observational study. BMJ Open 7:e017928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017928
Goshen-Gottstein E, Shapiro R, Shwartz C et al (2019) Incidence and risk factors for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: a historical cohort study. Isr Med Assoc J 21
Aksamija G, Mulabdic A, Rasic I, Aksamija L (2016) Evaluation of risk factors of surgical wound dehiscence in adults after laparotomy. Med Arch. https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2016.70.369-372
Becher RD, Hoth JJ, Miller PR et al (2012) Systemic inflammation worsens outcomes in emergency surgical patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 72:1140–1149. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3182516a97
Marik PE, Flemmer M (2012) The immune response to surgery and trauma: implications for treatment. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318265cf87
Gundel O, Gundersen SK, Dahl RM et al (2018) Timing of surgical site infection and pulmonary complications after laparotomy. Int J Surg (London, England) 52:56–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.02.022
Cihoric M, Tengberg LT, Bay-Nielsen M, Foss NB (2016) Prediction of outcome after emergency high-risk intra-abdominal surgery using the surgical apgar score. Anesth Analg 123:1516–1521. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000001501
Watt DG, Wilson MSJ, Shapter OC, Patil P (2015) 30-Day and 1-year mortality in emergency general surgery laparotomies: an area of concern and need for improvement? Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-014-0450-3
Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M et al (2019) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colorectal surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations: 2018. World J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4844-y
Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Bill V, Satyadas T (2020) Meta-analysis of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols in emergency abdominal surgery. World J Surg 44:1336–1348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05357-5
Nielsen LBJ, Tengberg LT, Bay-Nielsen M (2017) Laparoscopy in major abdominal emergency surgery seems to be a safe procedure. Dan Med J 64(5):A5370
Cheng H, Clymer JW, Po-Han Chen B et al (2018) Prolonged operative duration is associated with complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.03.022
McIlveen EC, Wright E, Shaw et al (2020) A prospective cohort study characterising patients declined emergency laparotomy: survival in the ‘NoLap’ population. Anaesthesia 75:54–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14839
Project Team. LRN (2019) The fifth Patient Report of the NELA 2019-Full Patient Report.pdf
Funding
Open Access funding provided by University of Oulu including Oulu University Hospital. No funding was received for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
Aura T Ylimartimo, Juho Nurkkala, Marjo Koskela, Sanna Lahtinen, Timo Kaakinen, Merja Vakkala, Siiri Hietanen and Janne Liisanantti declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ylimartimo, A.T., Nurkkala, J., Koskela, M. et al. Postoperative Complications and Outcome After Emergency Laparotomy: A Retrospective Study. World J Surg 47, 119–129 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-022-06783-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-022-06783-8