Abstract
Background
The use of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for treatment of liver malignancies is limited by the high rate of local recurrences. The aim of this experimental study was to evaluate parameters describing the reproducible target volume of a RFA procedure in order to facilitate better applicator placement.
Materials and methods
RFA was performed in perfused and nonperfused pig livers. The following parameters were measured: axial and transverse diameter, front margin, coagulation center, diameter of sphere ablated (D S), distance to center (DC), and volume. Graphic overlays were utilized to visualize variability. Parameters were evaluated for Rita XL (2 algorithms), LeVeen, and Rita Xli applicators.
Results
The best prediction of a reproducibly ablated target volume can be made by the diameter of the sphere ablated and the distance of the applicator tip to center of the sphere (DC). The spheres were significantly different in diameter (D S) depending on the applicator Rita XL 29 ± 6 mm, Rita XLwet 35 ± 5 mm, LeVeen 35 ± 8 mm, Rita Xli 44 ± 5 mm (perfused livers, p < 0.001). Graphic overlay demonstrated differences in variability that can influence the reliability of the system.
Conclusions
D S and DC as specific values for each applicator and algorithm facilitate a placement of the applicator relative to the target volume that maximizes the chance of complete ablation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mulier S, Ni Y, Jamart J, Ruers T, Marchal G, Michel L (2005) Local recurrence after hepatic radiofrequency coagulation: multivariate meta-analysis and review of contributing factors. Ann Surg 242:158–171
Aloia TA, Vauthey JN, Loyer EM et al (2006) Solitary colorectal liver metastasis: resection determines outcome. Arch Surg 141:460–466
Stippel DL, Brochhagen HG, Arenja M, Hunkemoller J, Holscher AH, Beckurts KT (2004) Variability of size and shape of necrosis induced by radiofrequency ablation in human livers: a volumetric evaluation. Ann Surg Oncol 11:420–425
Mulier S, Ni Y, Frich L et al (2007) Experimental and clinical radiofrequency ablation: proposal for standardized description of coagulation size and geometry. Ann Surg Oncol 14:1381–1396
Goldberg SN, Grassi CJ, Cardella JF et al (2005) Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria. Radiology 235:728–739
Bangard C, Gossmann A, Kasper HU et al (2006) Experimental radiofrequency ablation near the portal and the hepatic veins in pigs: differences in efficacy of a monopolar ablation system. J Surg Res 135:113–119
Solazzo SA, Liu Z, Lobo SM et al (2005) Radiofrequency ablation: importance of background tissue electrical conductivity—an agar phantom and computer modeling study. Radiology 236:495–502
Ng KK, Lam CM, Poon RT et al (2005) Porcine liver: morphologic characteristics and cell viability at experimental radiofrequency ablation with internally cooled electrodes. Radiology 235:478–486
Brieger J, Pereira PL, Trubenbach J et al (2003) In vivo efficiency of four commercial monopolar radiofrequency ablation systems: a comparative experimental study in pig liver. Invest Radiol 38:609–616
Lencioni RA, Allgaier HP, Cioni D et al (2003) Small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: randomized comparison of radio-frequency thermal ablation versus percutaneous ethanol injection. Radiology 228:235–240
Lin SM, Lin CJ, Lin CC, Hsu CW, Chen YC (2005) Randomised controlled trial comparing percutaneous radiofrequency thermal ablation, percutaneous ethanol injection, and percutaneous acetic acid injection to treat hepatocellular carcinoma of 3 cm or less. Gut 54:1151–1156
Mazzaferro V, Battiston C, Perrone S et al (2004) Radiofrequency ablation of small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation: a prospective study. Ann Surg 240:900–909
Seror O, Lepetit-Coiffe M, Quesson B, Trillaud H, Moonen CT (2006) Quantitative magnetic resonance temperature mapping for real-time monitoring of radiofrequency ablation of the liver: an ex vivo study. Eur Radiol 16:2265–2274
Berber E, Herceg NL, Casto KJ, Siperstein AE (2004) Laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of hepatic tumors: prospective clinical evaluation of ablation size comparing two treatment algorithms. Surg Endosc 18:390–396
Montgomery RS, Rahal A, Dodd GD, Leyendecker JR, Hubbard LG (2004) Radiofrequency ablation of hepatic tumors: variability of lesion size using a single ablation device. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:657–661
Mulier S, Ni Y, Miao Y et al (2003) Size and geometry of hepatic radiofrequency lesions. Eur J Surg Oncol 29:867–878
Pereira PL, Trubenbach J, Schenk M et al (2004) Radiofrequency ablation: in vivo comparison of four commercially available devices in pig livers. Radiology 232:482–490
Oshio A, Tamaki K, Shimizu I et al (2007) Double radiofrequency ablation is more extensive with a spherical zone shape compared to single ablation in a pig liver model. J Med Invest 54:28–34
Kobayashi M, Ikeda K, Someya T et al (2002) Stepwise hook extension technique for radiofrequency ablation therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncology 63:139–144
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stippel, D.L., Bangard, C., Prenzel, K. et al. Which parameters are needed for targeting a multitined radiofrequency device—an approach to a simple algorithm. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394, 671–679 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-008-0306-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-008-0306-6