Skip to main content
Log in

New aspects and approaches in pre-operative planning of hip reconstruction: a computer simulation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

All computer-aided surgery technologies assume that the surgeon knows the best position for the implant components. However, there is indirect evidence that simple anatomical information may not be sufficient for the surgeon to decide size and position of the implant in a repeatable manner.

Method

In the present study we estimated the variability in choosing the size and position of the components of a cementless total hip replacement (THR), using template-on-radiograph as well as computed tomography (CT)-based computer-aided planning. In addition, using a computer model, we assessed the sensitivity to such variability of implant fitting, location of the joint centre, skeletal range of motion, and resting length of major hip muscles. Using templates, surgeons selected the size with variability up to 2.5 mm for the stem and up to 4 mm for the socket. A similar variability was also observed when the CT-based planning program was used.

Results

No major differences were found between surgeons. The standard deviation over repeated planning sessions of the selected position for each component, using the CT-based planning software, was found to be 3.9 mm and 8.9°.

Conclusion

On the basis of the computer simulation, this variability did not affect the selected biomechanical parameters in a drastic way, although some differences were observed, especially in the lever arm of the hip muscles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stea S, Bordini B, Sudanese A, Toni A (2002) Register of hip prosthesis at Rizzoli Institute: eleven years’ experience. Acta Orthop Scand 73:43–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bargar WL, Bauer A, Borner M (1998) Primary and revision total hip replacement using the Robodoc system. Clin Orthop 354:82–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. DiGioia AM, Jaramaz B, Blackwell M, Simon DA, Morgan F, Moody JE, Nikou C, Colgan BD, Aston CA, Labarca RS, Kischell E, Kanade T (1998) The Otto Aufranc Award. Image guided navigation system to measure intraoperatively acetabular implant alignment. Clin Orthop 355:8–22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Leenders T, Vandevelde D, Mahieu G, Nuyts R (2002) Reduction in variability of acetabular cup abduction using computer assisted surgery: a prospective and randomized study. Comput Aided Surg 7:99–106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thomsen MN, Breusch SJ, Aldinger PR, Gortz W, Lahmer A, Honl M, Birke A, Nagerl H (2002) Robotically-milled bone cavities: a comparison with hand-broaching in different types of cementless hip stems. Acta Orthop Scand 73:379–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nogler M, Krismer M, Haid C, Ogon M, Bach C, Wimmer C (2001) Excessive heat generation during cutting of cement in the Robodoc hip-revision procedure. Acta Orthop Scand 72:595–599

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Viceconti M, Testi D, Simeoni M, Zannoni C (2003) An automated method to position prosthetic components within multiple anatomical spaces. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 70:121–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kepple TM, Sommer HJ 3rd, Lohmann Siegel K, Stanhope SJ (1998) A three-dimensional musculoskeletal database for the lower extremities. J Biomech 31:77–80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Delp SL, Komattu AV, Wixson RL (1994) Superior displacement of the hip in total joint replacement: effects of prosthetic neck length, neck-stem angle, and anteversion angle on the moment-generating capacity of the muscles. J Orthop Res 12:860–870

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vasavada AN, Delp SL, Maloney WJ, Schurman DJ, Zajac FE (1994) Compensating for changes in muscle length in total hip arthroplasty. Effects on the moment generating capacity of the muscles. Clin Orthop 302:121–133

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McGrory BJ, Morrey BF, Cahalan TD, An KN, Cabanela ME (1995) Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:865–869

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jerosch J, Steinbeck J, Stechmann J, Guth V (1997) Influence of a high hip centre on abductor muscle function. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 116:385–389

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Edwards BN, Tullos HS, Noble PC (1987) Contributory factors and etiology of sciatic nerve palsy in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 136–141

  14. Dhillon MS, Nagi ON (1992) Sciatic nerve palsy associated with total hip arthroplasty. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 18:521–526

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Friden J, Lieber RL (2002) Mechanical considerations in the design of surgical reconstructive procedures. J Biomech 35:1039–1045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lieber RL, Friden J (1997) Intraoperative measurement and biomechanical modeling of the flexor carpi ulnaris-to-extensor carpi radialis longus tendon transfer. J Biomech Eng 119:386–391

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lieber RL (1999) Skeletal muscle is a biological example of a linear electro-active actuator. Proceedings of the SPIE 6th Annual International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, San Diego, pp 3669–4003

  18. Maganaris CN (2001) Force-length characteristics of in vivo human skeletal muscle. Acta Physiol Scand 172:279–285

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Luigi Lena and Mauro Ansaloni for support during the experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Viceconti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Viceconti, M., Chiarini, A., Testi, D. et al. New aspects and approaches in pre-operative planning of hip reconstruction: a computer simulation. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389, 400–404 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-003-0446-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-003-0446-7

Keywords

Navigation