Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The validity of two Omron pedometers during treadmill walking is speed dependent

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of walking speed on the accuracy of measurement of steps, distance, and energy expenditure of two commercially available Omron pedometers [HJ-720IT-E2 (HJ-720) and HJ-113-E (HJ-113)]. Twenty-four untrained males (age, 22.7 ± 2.8 years; BMI, 24.38 ± 2.19 kg m−2; body fat (%), 16 ± 2.2; VO2max, 40.2 ± 6.5 ml kg−1 min−1) and 18 females (age, 22.4 ± 2.9 years; BMI, 21.68 ± 2.43 kg m−2; body fat (%), 23% ± 1.8; VO2max, 35.9 ± 2.8 ml kg−1 min−1) walked at five different velocities (54, 67, 80, 94 and 107 m min−1) on a treadmill in 5-min stages while wearing three types of pedometers: (a) HJ-720, (b) HJ-113, and (c) Yamax Digi-Walker SW-200 (YAM). Step-count for each pedometer was recorded at the end of each stage and compared with the value of a hand counter. Additionally, Omron pedometers were evaluated on their distance and energy expenditure (against VO2 measurement with a gas-exchange analyzer) accuracy during each stage. HJ-720 and HJ-113 demonstrated high accuracy (r = 0.80–0.99) at all speeds. YAM underestimated step-count only at 54 m min−1 (r = 0.46). HJ-720 and HJ-113 overestimated distance at slower speeds and underestimated distance at faster speeds, providing mean distance values that where to within 1.5–4% at 80 m min−1. HJ-720 and HJ-113 underestimated energy expenditure (gross kilocalories) by 28%, when compared to indirect calorimetry. These results suggest that although the Omron HJ-720 and HJ-113 pedometers are accurate in the measurement of step-count, they demonstrate limited accuracy in the assessment of traveled distance and energy expenditure in a speed-dependent manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American College of Sports Medicine (2000) ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, 6th edn. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, pp 5–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayabe M, Aoki J, Ishii K, Takayama K, Tanaka H (2008) Pedometer accuracy during stair climbing and bench stepping exercises. J Sports Sci Med 7:249–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Basset DR, Ainsworth BE, Leggett SR (1996) Accuracy of five electronic pedometers for measuring distance walked. Med Sci Sports Exerc 28:1071–1077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basset DR, Ainsworth BE, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, O’Brien WL, King GA (2000) Validity of four motion sensors in measuring moderate intensity physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:S471–S480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassett DR Jr, Mahar MT, Rowe DA, Morrow JR Jr (2008) Walking and measurement. Med Sci Sports Exerc 40(7S):S529–S536

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beets MW, Patton MM, Edwards S (2005) The accuracy of pedometers steps and time during walking in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37:513–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corder K, Brage S, Wareham NJ, Ekelund U (2007) Accelerometers and pedometers: methodology and clinical application. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 10:597–603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Craig CL, Cameron C, Griffiths JM, Tudor-Locke C (2010a) Descriptive epidemiology of youth pedometer-determined physical activity: Canplay. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 42(9):1639–1643

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Craig CL, Tudor-Locke C, Cragg S, Cameron C (2010b) Process and treatment of pedometer data collection for youth: the Canadian physical activity levels among youth study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 42(3):430–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crouter SE, Schneider PL, Karabulut M, Basset DR Jr (2003) Validity of 10 electronic pedometers for measuring steps, distance, and energy cost. Med Sci Sports Exerc 8:1455–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crouter SE, Schneider PL, Basset DR Jr (2005) Spring-levered versus piezo-electric pedometer accuracy in overweight and obese adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37(11):1673–1679

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries SI, Van Hirtum WJEM, Bekker I, Hopman-Rock M, Hirasing RA, Van Mechellen W (2009) Validity and reproducibility of motion sensors in youth: a systematic update. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 41(4):818–827

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JAG, Michael S, Corona BT, Simone J, Dennison DA (2007) Validation of an electronic pedometer in a field-based setting. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39(5):S186

    Google Scholar 

  • Fatouros IG, Tournis S, Leontsini D, Jamurtas AZ, Sxina M, Thomakos P, Manousaki M, Douroudos I, Taxildaris K, Mitrakou A (2005) Leptin and adiponectin responses in overweight inactive elderly following resistance training and detraining are intensity-related. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol. 90:5970–5977

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hasson RE, Jeannie H, Pober DM, Staudenmayer J, Freedson PT (2009) Validity of the Omron HJ-112 pedometer during treadmill walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41(4):805–809

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hatano Y (1993) Use of the pedometer for promoting daily waking exercise. Int Council Health Phys Educ Recreat 29:4–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatano Y (1997) Prevelance and use of pedometer. Res J Walk 1:45–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendelman D, Miller K, Baggett C, Debold E, Freedson P (2000) Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:1320–1326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook EA, Barreira TV, Kang M (2009) Validity and reliability of Omron pedometers for prescribed and self-paced walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 41(3):669–673

    Google Scholar 

  • Karabulut M, Crouter SE (2005) Comparison of two waist mounted and two ankle mounted electronic pedometers. Eur J Appl Physiol 95:335–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Katzmarzyk PT, Church TS, Blair SN (2004) Cardiorespiratory fitness attenuates the effects of the metabolic syndrome on all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in men. Arch Intern Med. 164:1092–1097

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Le Masurier GC, Tudor-Locke C (2003) Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer accuracy under controlled conditions. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35(5):867–871

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Le Masurier G, Lee SM, Tudor-Locke C (2004) Motion sensor accuracy under controlled and free-living conditions. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 36(5):905–910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malm C, Nyberg P, Engstrom M, Sjodin B, Lenkei R, Ekblom B, Lundberg I (2000) Immunological changes in human skeletal muscle and blood after eccentric exercise and multiple biopsies. J Physiol 529:243–262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Melanson E, Knoll J, Bell M (2004) Commercially available pedometers: considerations for accurate step counting. Prev Med 39:361–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakae S, Oshima Y, Ishii K (2008) Accuracy of spring levered and piezo-electric pedometers in primary school Japanese children. J Physiol Anthropol 27(5):233–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson TE, Leenders NY, Sherman WM (1998) Comparison of activity monitors worn during treadmill walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc 30(5):11 (abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafferty AP, Reeves MJ, McGee HB, Pivarnik JM (2002) Physical activity patterns among walkers and compliance with public health recommendations. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 34(8):1255–1261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter HB, Kowalchuk JM, Whipp BJ (2006) A test to establish maximum O2 uptake despite no plateau in the O2 uptake response to ramp incremental exercise. J Appl Physiol 100:764–770

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands AV, Stone MR, Eston RG (2007) Influence of speed and step frequency during walking and running on motion sensor output. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 39(4):716–727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider PL, Crouter SE, Lukajic O, Basset DR (2003) Accuracy and reliability of 10 pedometers for measuring steps over a 400-m walk. Med Sci Sports Exerc 10:1779–1784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider PL, Crouter SE, Basset DR (2004) Pedometer measures of free-living physical activity: comparison of 13 models. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2:331–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd FE, Toloza E, McClung DC, Schmalzried PT (1999) Step activity monitor: increased accuracy in quantifying ambulatory activity. J Orthop Res 17:703–708

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sidak Z (1967) Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 62:626–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swartz AM, Strath SJ, Miller NE, Grimm EK, Ewalt LA, Loy MS, Gennuso KP (2009) Validity of physical activity monitors in assessing energy expenditure in normal, overweight, and obese adults. Open Sports Sci J. 2:58–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tudor-Locke CE, Myers AM (2001) Methodological considerations for researchers and practitioners using pedometers to measure physical (ambulatory) activity. Res Q Exerc Sport 72:1–12

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tudor-Locke CE, Williams J, Reis J, Pluto D (2002) Utility of pedometers for assessing physical activity. Convergent validity. Sports Med 32:795–808

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tudor-Locke C, Sisson SB, Lee SM, Swan PD (2005) Pedometer-determined step count guidelines for classifying walking intensity in a young ostensibly healthy population. Can J Appl Physiol 30(6):666–676

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Health and Human Services (1996) Physical activity and health: a report of the surgeon general. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Promotion, Atlanta, GA

  • Welk GJ, Differding JA, Thompson RW, Blair SN, Dziura J, Hart P (2000) The utility of the Digi-Walker step counter to assess daily physical activity patterns. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32(9 Suppl):S481–S448

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

No financial support was received from any of the pedometer companies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, Democritus University of Thrace, University Campus, 69100, Komotini, Greece

    Dimitra M. Giannakidou, Antonis Kambas, Nikolaos Ageloussis, Ioannis Fatouros, Christos Christoforidis, Fotini Venetsanou, Ioannis Douroudos & Kyriakos Taxildaris

Authors
  1. Dimitra M. Giannakidou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Antonis Kambas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nikolaos Ageloussis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ioannis Fatouros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Christos Christoforidis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fotini Venetsanou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ioannis Douroudos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Kyriakos Taxildaris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonis Kambas.

Additional information

Communicated by Susan A. Ward.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giannakidou, D.M., Kambas, A., Ageloussis, N. et al. The validity of two Omron pedometers during treadmill walking is speed dependent. Eur J Appl Physiol 112, 49–57 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-1951-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-1951-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation