Skip to main content
Log in

Supervisor behaviour and its associations with employees’ health in Europe

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To estimate the magnitude of the associations between different facets of supervisor behaviour and several health-related outcomes, and to assess whether these associations are mediated by known occupational health factors.

Methods

Cross-sectional data from the European Working Conditions Survey were analysed by generalised linear mixed models (n = 32,770). Six regression models were estimated. Dependent variables include musculoskeletal (upper body, lower limbs, backache) and psychosomatic symptoms (stress and self-assessed general health). Independent variables correspond to several facets of supervisor behaviours such as supervisor support, feedback on work, ability to solve conflicts, encouragement to participate in decisions, and known occupational risk and protective factors.

Results

Even though supervisor behaviour is mediated by several known occupational risk factors, it still accounts for a substantial proportion of explained variance. The order of magnitude of associations was comparable to the strength of associations of known occupational risk factors. Odds ratios vary from 0.79 95 % CI [0.73–0.86] to 1.12 95 % CI [0.97–1.29] for dichotomous dependent variables. Regression coefficients vary from –0.22 95 % CI [–0.28 to –0.17] to 0.07 95 % CI [0.04–0.10] for metric dependent variables. Results suggest that good conflict solving skills, supervisor’s work-planning ability, and a participative leadership style have the strongest predictive power regarding all health-related outcomes considered.

Conclusion

Supervisor behaviour seems to play a non-negligible role from an occupational health perspective concerning the prevalence of musculoskeletal and psychosomatic symptoms. Results suggest that supervisor behaviour should be routinely assessed and monitored, especially among occupational groups reporting a lower quality of supervisor behaviours.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold KA, Turner N, Barling J, Kelloway E, McKee M (2007) Transformational leadership and psychological well-being: the mediating role of meaningful work. J Occup Health Psychol 12(3):193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass BM, Bass R (2008) The Bass handbook of leadership, 4th edn. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck AT (1963) Thinking and depression. I. Idiosyncratic content and cognitive distortions. Arch Gen Psychiatry 9:324–333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Diggle P, Heagerty P, Liang K, Zeger S (2002) Analysis of longitudinal data. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurofound (ed) (2012) Fifth European Working Conditions Survey. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (2006) NACE Rev. 2. Introductory Guidelines. Eurostat, Luxembourg

  • Fahrmeir L, Tutz G, Hennevogl W (2001) Multivariate statistical modelling based on generalized linear models. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Farioli A, Mattioli S, Quaglieri A, Curti S, Violante FS, Coggon D (2014) Musculoskeletal pain in Europe: the role of personal, occupational, and social risk factors. Scand J Work Environ Health 40:36–46. doi:10.5271/sjweh.3381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman EA, Mumford MD, Zaccaro SJ, Levin KY, Korotkin K, Hein MB (1991) Taxonomic efforts in the description of leader behaviour: a synthesis and functional interpretation. Leadership Quart 2(4):245–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke F, Felfe J, Pundt A (2014) The impact of health-oriented leadership on follower health development and test of a new instrument measuring health-promoting leadership. Zeitschrift für Personalforschung 28:139–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup-Europe (2010) Fifth European Working Conditions Survey. Technical report

  • Gelman A, Carlin J, Stern H, Dunson D, Vehtari A, Rubin D (2013) Bayesian data analyses. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Green AE, Albanese A, Shapiro N, Aarons G (2014) The roles of individual and organizational factors in burnout among community-based mental health service providers. Psychol Serv 11(1):41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregersen S, Kuhnert S, Zimber A, Nienhaus A (2011) Führungsverhalten und Gesundheit - Zum Stand der Forschung [Leadership behaviour and health—current research state] Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) 73:3–12 doi:10.1055/s-0029-1246180

  • Gurt J, Schwennen C, Elke G (2011) Health-specific leadership: Is there an association between leader consideration for the health of employees and their strain and well-being? Work Stress 25:108–127. doi:10.1080/02678373.2011.595947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadfield J (2010) MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: The MCMCglmm R Package. J Stat Softw 33:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ILO (2008) International standard classification of occupations. International Labour Organisation, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Joormann J, Quinn ME (2014) Cognitive processes and emotion regulation in depression. Depress Anxiety 31(4):308–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge TA, Piccolo RF (2004) Transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity. J Appl Psychol 89:755–768. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge TA, Piccolo RF, Ilies R (2004) The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. J Appl Psychol 89:36–51. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junker NM, van Dick R (2014) Implicit theories in organizational settings: a systematic review and research agenda of implicit leadership and followership theories. Leadership Quart 25:1154–1173. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuoppala J, Lamminpaa A, Liira J, Vainio H (2008) Leadership, job well-being, and health effects–a systematic review and a meta-analysis. J Occup Environ Med 50:904–915. doi:10.1097/JOM.0b013e31817e918d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H (1973) The nature of managerial work. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyberg A, Bernin P, Theorell T (2005) The impact of leadership on the health of subordinates, vol 1. National Institute for Working Life, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyberg A, Alfredsson L, Theorell T, Westerlund H, Vahtera J, Kivimaki M (2009) Managerial leadership and ischaemic heart disease among employees: the Swedish WOLF study. Occup Environ Med 66:51–55. doi:10.1136/oem.2008.039362

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Revelle W, Zinbarg R (2009) Coefficients Alpha, Beta, Omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika 74:145–154. doi:10.1007/s11336-008-9102-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schyns B, Schilling J (2013) How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. Leadership Quart 24:138–158. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skakon J, Nielsen K, Borg V, Guzman J (2010) Are leaders’ well-being, behaviours and style associated with the affective well-being of their employees? A systematic review of three decades of research. Work Stress 24:107–139. doi:10.1080/02678373.2010.495262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tepper B (2000) Consequences of abusive supervision. Acad Manag J 43:178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theorell T, Nyberg A, Leineweber C, Hanson LLM, Oxenstierna G, Westerlund H (2012) Non-listening and self centered leadership—relationships to socioeconomic conditions and employee mental health. PLoS ONE 7(9):e44119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2012) International standard classification of education ISCED 2011. UNESCO Institute for Statistics, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Buuren S (2012) Flexible imputation of missing data. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wu T, Hu C (2009) Abusive supervision and employee emotional exhaustion: dispositional antecedents and boundaries. Group Org Manage 34(2):143–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukl G (2013) Leadership in organizations. Pearson, Essex

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

For the purposes of this paper, data access was granted by the UK Data Service established by the Economic and Social Research Council in the UK (http://ukdataservice.ac.uk).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diego Montano.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 498 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 46 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Montano, D. Supervisor behaviour and its associations with employees’ health in Europe. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 89, 289–298 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-015-1072-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-015-1072-8

Keywords

Navigation