Abstract
Purpose
To describe and demonstrate issues with return to work (RTW) outcome metrics in common use among clinical researchers and injury compensation organisations. We also aim to describe a framework on which to capture relevant RTW information including current employment status and data on participation and maintenance.
Methods
Structured telephone interviews discussing participant health and vocational status were conducted following compensable transport-related injury. Participants who were working at the time of injury and took time off work because of their injuries (N = 414) were asked questions relating to their work participation and maintenance, including length of continuous employment, hours worked and duties performed before and after injury. A series of RTW metrics was developed and applied to survey data. Rates of RTW according to each metric were calculated.
Results
Eighty-four per cent of participants had achieved some employment since their injury, and 74% were working at the time of the survey. In contrast, only 58% of participants were working the same hours as prior to their injury and had been doing so for at least 3 months. These data show that different impressions of rehabilitative success can be obtained depending on the criterion used to define RTW suggesting that reliance on a single RTW index (e.g. ‘are you currently working?’) will not represent important characteristics of employment.
Conclusion
A multi-layered approach to measuring RTW that includes data on reasons for not working, length of continuous employment, hours and duties performed after injury provides greater insight into the vocational status of injured individuals compared to single metrics or outcomes that fail to capture key detail on motives and participation. This information can assist clinicians to more accurately monitor the progress of rehabilitation following injury and compensation schemes to more effectively monitor their performance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amick BCI, Lerner D, Rogers WH, Rooney T, Katz JN (2000) A review of health-related work outcome measures and their uses, and recommended measures. Spine 25(24):3152–3160
Blonk R, Brenninkmeijer V, Lagerveld S, Houtman I (2006) Return to work: a comparison of two cognitive behavioural interventions in cases of work-related psychological complaints among the self-employed. Work & Stress 20:129–144
Brox JI, Sorensen R, Friis A, Nygaard O, Indahl A, Keller A, Ingebrigtsen T, Eriksen HR, Holm I, Koller AK, Riise R, Reikeras O (2003) Randomized clinical trial of lumbar instrumented fusion and cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration. Spine 28(17):1913–1921. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000083234.62751.7A
Bültmann U, Franche R-L, Hogg-Johnson S, Côté P, Lee H, Severin C, Vidmar M, Carnide N (2007) Health status, work limitations, and return-to-work trajectories in injured workers with musculoskeletal disorders. Qual Life Res 16(7):1167–1178
Burton WN, Conti DJ (1999) The real measure of productivity. Bus Health 17:34–36
Butler RJ, Johnson WG, Baldwin ML (1995) Managing work disability: why first return to works is not a measure of success. Ind Labor Relat Rev 48(3):452–469
Casso G, Cachin C, van Melle G, Gerster J-C (2004) Return-to-work status 1 year after muscle reconditioning in chronic low back pain patients. Joint Bone Spine 71(2):136–139
Fadyl J, McPherson K (2008) Return to Work after injury: a review of evidence regarding expectations and injury perceptions, and their influence on outcome. J Occup Rehabil 18(4):362–374
Gabbe BJ, Cameron PA, Williamson OD, Edwards ER, Graves SE, Richardson MD (2007) The relationship between compensable status and long-term patient outcomes following orthopaedic trauma. Med J Aust 187(1):14–17
Holtslag HR, Post MW, van der Werken C, Lindeman E (2007) Return to work after major trauma. Clin Rehabil 21(4):373–383. doi:10.1177/0269215507072084
Krause N, Dasinger LK, Neuhauser F (1998) Modified work and return to work: a review of the literature. J Occup Rehabil 8(2):113–139
MacDermid JC, Grewal R, MacIntyre NJ (2009) Using an evidence-based approach to measure outcomes in clinical practice. Hand Clin 25(1):97–111. doi:10.1016/j.hcl.2008.11.001
Marras WS, Ferguson SA, Burr D, Schabo P, Maronitis A (2007) Low back pain recurrence in occupational environments. Spine 32(21):2387–2397. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181557be9
Pantazis C, Gordon D, Levitas R (eds) (2006) Poverty and social exclusion in Britain: the millennium survey. The Policy Press, Bristol
Price C, Arden N, Coglan L, Rogers P (2005) Cost-effectiveness and safety of epidural steroids in the management of sciatica. Health Technol Assess 9(33):1–58
Ruseckaite R, Gabbe B, Vogel AP, Collie A (2011) Health care utilisation following hospitalisation for transport-related injury. Injury (in press). doi:10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.011
SafeWork Australia (2010) Comparison of work health and safety and workers’ compensation schemes in Australia and New Zealand (2010). Comparative performance monitoring report, 12th edn. Canberra, Australia
Smith A (1864) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. T. Nelson & Sons, London, p 1
Stull DE, Leidy NK, Parasuraman B, Chassany O (2009) Optimal recall periods for patient-reported outcomes: challenges and potential solutions. Curr Med Res Opin 25:929–942
Trief PM, Grant W, Fredrickson B (2000) A prospective study of psychological predictors of lumbar surgery outcome. Spine 25(20):2616–2621
van Velzen JM, de Groot S, Post MW, Slootman JH, van Bennekom CA, van der Woude LH (2009a) Return to work after spinal cord injury: is it related to wheelchair capacity at discharge from clinical rehabilitation? Am J Phys Med Rehabil 88(1):47–56. doi:10.1097/PHM.0b013e31818e6140
van Velzen JM, van Bennekom CAM, Edelaar MJA, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MHW (2009b) How many people return to work after acquired brain injury?: a systematic review. Brain Inj 23(6):473–488. doi:10.1080/02699050902970737
Waddell G, Burton AK (2006) Is work good for your health and well-being?. Department for Work and Pensions, The Stationary Office, London
Wasiak R, Young A, Roessler R, McPherson K, van Poppel M, Anema JR (2007) Measuring return to work. J Occup Rehabil 17(4):766–781
Wilkinson R, Marmot MG (2003) Social determinants of health: the solid facts, 2nd edn. World Health Organisation, Copenhagen, Denmark
Young AE, Murphy GC (2009) Employment status after spinal cord injury (1992–2005): a review with implications for interpretation, evaluation, further research, and clinical practice. Int J Rehabil Res 32(1):1–11. doi:10.1097/MRR.1090b1013e32831c32838b32819
Young A, Roessler R, Wasiak R, McPherson K, van Poppel M, Anema J (2005a) A developmental conceptualization of return to work. J Occup Rehabil 15(4):557–568
Young A, Wasiak R, Roessler R, McPherson K, Anema J, van Poppel M (2005b) Return-to-work outcomes following work disability: stakeholder motivations, interests and concerns. J Occup Rehabil 15(4):543–556
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the Transport Accident Commission, Victoria, Australia. The authors wish to acknowledge the contributions of Nina Ellis, Alan Woodroffe, Robert Johnstone from the TAC and Darren Pennay from the Social Research Centre.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vogel, A.P., Barker, S.J., Young, A.E. et al. What is return to work? An investigation into the quantification of return to work. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 84, 675–682 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-011-0644-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-011-0644-5