Skip to main content
Log in

Management of strabismus with hemianopic visual field defects

  • Neurophthalmology
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Hemianopia and strabismus leads to severe disturbance of visual orientation and diplopia under binocular conditions if the deviated eye has a normal retinal localization.

Subjects and methods

Four cases with homonymous (two) and bitemporal (two) hemianopia and strabismus will be described with respect to binocular visual field and diplopia/confusion. All of them were recommended for strabismus surgery. Preoperatively, prism adaptation test was carried out to analyze functional results and fusional competence. In three of the four cases, strabismus surgery was successfully performed to avoid diplopia/confusion. All three patients revealed normal retinal correspondence. Furthermore, in two cases surgery led to an extension of binocular visual field; in one case with a bitemporal hemianopia and hemifield-slide phenomenon, blurred central vision and reading problems reduced significantly postoperatively. In one patient with anomalous retinal correspondence due to early childhood trauma exotropia led to an extension of the binocular visual field. In this case, strabismus surgery would have been unfavourable.

Results

Case 1 showed a homonymous hemianopia to the left and acquired exotropia of the right eye, leading to binocular diplopia. Case 2 with homonymous hemianopia to the right and exotropia of right eye revealed anomalous retinal correspondence after history of perinatal brain injury, resulting in absence of diplopia and enlargement of visual field to the right. Cases 3 and 4 with bitemporal hemianopia suffered from sensory disturbances caused by additional acquired strabismus. The exodeviation of the right eye in case 3 led to a restriction of binocular visual field with overlap of the nasal parts causing diplopia, whereas the esodeviation of case 4 resulted in a “gap” between the nasal parts (blind area).

Conclusion

Depending on the extent of visual field defects and on retinal correspondence, functional consequences for binocular vision and binocular visual field should be considered prior to surgery. In normal retinal correspondence, strabismus surgery will be indicated in most cases because of diplopia. However, surgery might result in a reduction of binocular visual field. Preoperatively, it is important to map monocular and binocular visual fields, to examine retinal correspondence, and to undertake prism adaptation test to imitate the postoperative functional result and risk of double vision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Huber A (1991) Die homonyme Hemianopsie. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilk 199:396–405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schiefer U, Isbert M, Mikolaschek E, Mildenberger I, Krapp E, Schiller J, Thanos S, Hart W (2004) Distribution of scotoma pattern related to chiasmal lesions with special reference to anterior junction syndrome. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 242:468–477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schiefer U, Schiller J, Hart W (2007) Perimetry. In: Schiefer U, Wilhelm H, Hart W (eds) Clinical Neuro-Ophthalmology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 48–52

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Herzau V, Bleher I, Joos-Kratsch E (1988) Infantile exotropia with homonymous hemianopia: a rare contraindication for strabismus surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 226:148–149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Levy Y, Turetz J, Krakowski D, Hartmann B, Nemet P (1995) Development of compensating exotropia with anomalous retinal correspondence after early infancy in congential homonymous hemianopia. J Pediat Ophthalmol Strabismus 32:236–238

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Paysee EA, Coats DK (1997) Anomalous head posture with early-onset homonymous hemianopia. J AAPOS 1:209–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Donahue SP, Haun AK (2007) Exotropia and face turn in children with homonymous hemianopia. J Neuro-Ophthalmol 27:304–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pratt-Johnson JA (1973) Central disruption of fusional amplitude. Brit J Ophthalmol 57:347–350

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kirkham TH (1972) The ocular symptomatology of pituitary tumours. Proc R Soc Med 1972(65):517–518

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nachtigaeller H, Hoyt WF (1970) Störungen des Seheindrucks bei bitemporaler Hemianopsie und Verschiebung der Sehachsen. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilk 156:821–836

    Google Scholar 

  11. Komatsu H (2006) The neural mechanisms of perceptual filling-in. Nat Rev Neurosci 7:220–231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Herzau V (1992) The binocular visual field in strabismus of early onset. Jap Orth J 20:30–42

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gote H, Gregersen E, Rindziunski E (1993) Exotropia and panoramic vision compensating for an occult congenital homonymous heminopia. A case report. Binoc Vision Eye Muscle Surg Q 8:129–132

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gamio S, Melek N (2003) When the patient says no. Management of exotropia with hemianopic visual field defects. Binocul Vis Strabismus Q 18:167–170

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Saleh GM, Sivaprasad S, Hammond CJ (2006) Homonymous hemianopia and exotropia: an important management issue. Eye 20:1402–1404

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Good WV, Good WV, Jan JE, DeSa L, Barkovich AJ, Groenveld M, Hoyt CS (1994) Cortical visual impairment in children. Surv Ophthalmol 38:351–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoyt CS, Good V (1993) Ocular motor adaptions to congenital hemianopia. Binoc Vision Eye Muscle Surg Q 8:125–126

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

None.

Financial disclosure

The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dorothea Besch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Waveren, M., Jägle, H. & Besch, D. Management of strabismus with hemianopic visual field defects. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251, 575–584 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-012-2045-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-012-2045-1

Keywords

Navigation